EDITORIAL – Laws against distracted walking go one step too far

(Image: Mel Rothenburger photo)

An editorial by Mel Rothenburger.

HIGHER FINES for distracted driving are now in effect, and the B.C. government announced this week that the next step will be higher auto insurance premiums.

In addition to penalty points and fines, those collecting distracted driving tickets will have to pay a special premium that could add as much as $2,000 to their bill.

I’m all for it. There are still way too many yahoos out there texting as they barrel along in their two-ton death machines.

It’s not just about texting, of course. Let’s face it, who among us hasn’t on occasion answered a cellphone call when our piece-of-junk, after-market, hang-on-the-visor Blue Tooth is on the fritz, and we know it’s our better half needing us to pick something up on the way home.

We know it’s wrong. Still, how far do we go with cracking down on distractions? You did know, didn’t you, that sucking on that Starbuck’s latte or Tim’s double-double as you head to work is considered distracted driving?

Seriously, if the gendarmes and government were to get serious about that, wouldn’t it make sense to outlaw the drive-thru coffee shops and restaurants that supply the stuff?

Good luck with that.

But where it gets seriously ridiculous is the idea of making distracted walking an offence, which has happened in some places. They’re called zombie laws.

Walk down any sidewalk and you’ll bump into somebody — literally — yakking on their cellphone.

Take away a smart phone and the average person soon begins sweating and twitching as withdrawal sets in. But we can’t control every possible nuance of human behavior.

The rationale for distracted walking penalties is that a phone-blabbing or texting pedestrian might miss a signal and walk into a car or bicycle. It happens, but I’d venture to say most pedestrians who get hit by cars are properly and legally in crosswalks with the right of way.

Pedestrians, of course, should pay attention. But let’s allow reason to prevail and reel in the long arm of the law.

Mel Rothenburger’s Armchair Mayor editorials appear twice daily Mondays through Thursdays on CFJC- TV. His Armchair Mayor column is published Saturdays on and CFJC Today. Contact him at

About Mel Rothenburger (6477 Articles) is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

2 Comments on EDITORIAL – Laws against distracted walking go one step too far

  1. Distracted walking laws? No need… Darwin’s Law is already in effect!

  2. Banning drive-thru and the restaurants that contribute immensely to our culture of carelessness and waste….that would be fantastic!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: