CIVIC ELECTION ISSUES – The myth of City Hall taxing Sun Rivers, New Afton

(Image: Mel Rothenburger file photo)
Part Three in a series on some of the key issues raised in the current civic election campaign.
By MEL ROTHENBURGER
Publisher, ArmchairMayor.ca
ARE SUN RIVERS residents getting a free ride from the City? Mayoral candidate Mike O’Reilly contends they’re mooching (my word, not his), in effect, off their urban cousins.
It’s a claim he’s been making for several years, and has raised it again during the current civic election campaign in answer to what he’d do about high taxes in Kamloops.

Mel Rothenburger.
A half dozen years ago, O’Reilly said Sun Rivers and neighbouring Sienna Ridge were freeloading from the city to the extent of $250,000. Now, he insists the number is around $800,000 to a million.
That’s because he’s reframed his argument.
Five years ago O’Reilly was arguing that non-TteS residents of Sun Rivers should be paying hospital taxes similar to what Kamloops residents do. That amounted to $250,000 City taxpayers were saddled with as a result of the fact Sun Rivers folks don’t have to contribute to major health infrastructure, according to O’Reilly.
“Everybody else in the TNRD actually pays 40 per cent of the cost of the new hospital and new equipment — with the exception of Sun Rivers and Sienna Ridge — and that to me is not a level playing field whatsoever,” O’Reilly was quoted as saying at the time, in his position as a Thompson Regional Hospital District director.
The Tk’emlúps te Secwe̓pemc council listened, and turned him down flat.
Now, on the election hustings, O’Reilly has expanded his ambition. Sun Rivers and Sienna Ridge, he says, enjoy the same quality of life as Kamloops residents “while paying only a fraction of the costs for municipal parks and recreation facilities.”
This, he insists, translates to a tax shortfall in Kamloops of “nearly” $800,000 to $1 million per year. Or, a tax subsidy of .5 percent to .65 percent.
While calculating the number for hospitals is relatively simple, his claim about parks and recreation facilities could bear some scrutiny. It sounds more like a rough guess.
Lacking consent from the Band, it might theoretically be possible to levy disproportionately hefty user fees against non-City residents at City amenities. But how to do it — station guards at the doors checking for proof of residency?
Bringing Sun Rivers and Sienna Ridge into the picture when plans for the Performing Arts Centre were being developed might have been possible by including them in a referendum but that obviously didn’t happen.
The O’Reilly plan would, basically, force several thousand non-City residents to pay taxes to the City without any voice in City decisions or policies. It’s called taxation without representation, and revolutions have been fought over that sort of thing.
O’Reilly also wants to annex the New Afton mine west of town. That, according to O’Reilly’s arithmetic, would cut City property taxes by one to 1.5 percent.
Expanding the City’s boundaries to take in New Afton was attempted years ago and failed, and it’s doubtful anything much has changed since then, but more on that in a minute.
These scenarios are theoretically a way to expand the City’s tax base in order to bring down property taxes, a different approach than his competitor Nelly Dever’s “Co-build” proposal for building new infrastructure.
But it’s no more than a wish, a goal. As O’Reilly acknowledges in his platform, in so many words, they’re basically nice-to-haves.
The Ttes can’t be forced to start taxing Sun Rivers and Sienna Ridge residents more so it can then turn over a bunch of cash to the City. But, he says, he’d begin negotiations “right away,” while admitting it wouldn’t “happen overnight.”
Why TteS would change its mind on the matter five years later, just because O’Reilly now wants to get at it “right away” is hard to figure. O’Reilly also ignores a very important fact about taxes paid by residents of reserve subdivisions.
When Sun Rivers was created by federal law at the turn of the century with a special 99-year leasing framework, the concept and practice of equal taxation was built in. Equal taxation, that is, to the City of Kamloops. It was deemed proper that a Sun Rivers family should pay the same amount of taxes as city dwellers living in a house of similar value.
The difference is that Sun Rivers residents pay their taxes to the Band while City residents ante up to City Hall.
Sienna Ridge was established under the same federal regulation as Sun Rivers.
So, non-status residents on the reserve are already paying their fair share. To get at that million dollars O’Reilly is talking about, the Band would either have to increase their taxes and, thereby, create an inequity, or carve off part of what the Band receives and hand it over to the City.
Not gonna happen.
And, of course, there’s the tremendous economic contribution Sun Rivers and Sienna Ridge residents make to City coffers when they go into town to buy goods and play, without the City having to pay a dime for the roads, utilities and services in those communities.
As for New Afton, well, best of luck. Then-mayor Peter Milobar and his council tried it in 2014, and failed. To achieve annexation, the City would have had to negotiate agreement among a bewildering array of stakeholders including several provincial ministries, the TteS and Skeetchestn Bands (which already had, and have, revenue-sharing agreements on the mine) and, not least, the TNRD (which receives some tax revenue from New Afton).
After all that, it would have to go to the residents of Kamloops for permission via — may I say it — an AAP or referendum.
The plan was preceded by a gradual lessening of heavy-industrial tax rates by the City so the New Afton annexation would have simply assuaged the budget pain a little. There was really nothing in it for New Afton.
With the two Bands threatening legal action unless the City shared a substantial portion of resulting tax revenues, and opposition from the mine, the idea was dropped.
Reviving the New Afton scenario, along with Sun Rivers, is mere spitballing, blue skying, but it gives O’Reilly something to talk about when the issue of property taxes comes up.
Mel Rothenburger is a former regular contributor to CFJC-TV and CBC radio, publishes the ArmchairMayor.ca opinion website, writes for the Kamloops Chronicle and is a recipient of the Jack Webster Foundation Lifetime Achievement Award, and was a Webster Foundation Commentator of the Year finalist. He has served as mayor of Kamloops, school board chair and TNRD director, and is a retired daily newspaper editor. He can be reached at mrothenburger@armchairmayor.ca.
He isn’t the first one to bring it up.I remember Hon Mayor Ken Christiansen bringing up the Sun Rivers as well..My response was always these people can’t even Vote unless they own some property in town.I don’t care who you are, you shouldn’t have to pay Municple Property Taxes in a Community you have no say in anyways.My parents moved out a few km past Lafarge 30 years ago and recently settled in Sun Rivers 4 or 5 years ago.My Father was and still is at age of 80 (works for my brother) a very successful Accountant in town.He was Senior Partner in one of Kamloops biggest firms for decades before he downsized.He owned a number of buildings in town up until he sold his last one 3 or 4 years ago.My parents property taxes to the band for the home they resides in now went up 50 bucks.Forget about trying to get them paying taxes, never going to happen.However Kamloops should be looking collqborating more with KIB and building on Reserve land.Police Station, Convention Centre.This is where build kamloops should partner up with..Give the Airport to KIB.Let them do the motels, fire the hockey rink over there build the Convention Centre there.Working with these bands is the only way Kamloops Tax Payrrs are goi g to save money..Don’t try annexing them..Give it to them to build..
LikeLike
Taxpayers spent about $26 million in Southwest Sector water and sewer infrastructure in the Iron Mask area in the past two years.
It’s kind of ironic for O’Reilly to complain about nearby residents who spend money in Kamloops without paying taxes while his Comet Development’s Iron Mask Industrial Park will definitely benefit from these costly upgrades and extensions.
How many decades will it take for the City to recoup these costs from the taxes paid by Comet and its few neighbours?
LikeLike
And likely not a mention about that by our young friends Kristen Holliday or Levi Landry. They are too busy tearing apart a person for reasons beyond my understanding.
Do either Kristen or Levi own property and directly pay property tax to the City? That’s something worth researching and report back, Bronwen.
LikeLike
I asked that very question to the man himself during last year’s budget civic engagement at the lounge in the arena…he never gave an answer. Do people who do not have a pecuniary stake, would really want in good conscience vote for this person?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Why stop there, Mr. O’Reilly? Why not attempt to extract taxes from leaseholders in the Mount Paul Industrial Park? Surely they benefit from city services such as the dump amongst others.
How about annexing the household properties for tax revenue that are situated in the TNRD at the edges of the Kamloops borders?
How about attempting to tax other household residents on TteS lands?
I’m sure this ridiculous notion has been raised by Mr. O’Reilly because it’s great political theatre to try and dazzle Kamloops voters, and because he’s not accountable to those in the areas not governed by the City of Kamloops.
LikeLiked by 1 person
thank you for the explanation…what it is amazing is that the O’ Reilly after all these years on council and in close proximity to managers, band members and other “important” people seemingly knows little about the whole scenario…
LikeLike