LETTER – What was the purpose of releasing info about mayor’s office?

The mayor’s door to current office. (Image: File screenshot, Politics Kamloops-Thompson-Cariboo.)
Councillor O’Reilly and Council:
Upon listening to the council meeting today (Oct. 8, 2024), Councillor O’Reilly was asked why information from a closed meeting was discussed in the public (referring to the moving of the mayor’s office). He replied that it was based on a “communication strategy” that was discussed and agreed upon by Council.
Can I ask:
-What was the purpose of releasing to the public, this information about moving the Mayors office?
-What was the basis of this communication strategy and the ultimate goal for this information to be released?
– What “community benefit” was gained by grandstanding about this action being taken?
– As this was reported by the media far before O’Reilly’s media interviews, prior to it even being distributed, is there an immediate action being taken to find the source of the leak to ensure this does not happen again? If not, why not?
The only reason that is evident why this would have been made a major story is to cause personal damage, defamation and embarrassment to the Mayor. On the surface, this is a prime example of bullying and harassment – because there was absolutely no community benefit to publicly making the statements that you did.If the media asked about it, the high road would have been to simply say”. No comment, ask the Mayor” rather than publicly making your statement about moving him to the basement which you all knew would simply just make a mockery of him.
ARTHUR LORING
It is obvious that the campaign against this most unprecedented and unpalatable mayor is an ongoing preoccupation with council no doubt well supported by administrators. It is also without a doubt in my experience and opinion that the arrogance of this council coupled with the arrogance of the present CAO is unprecedented, unhealthy, uncalled for and unacceptable.
LikeLike
I’m getting sick of all the leaks. When will City Hall get the RCMP or Privacy Commissioner’s Office involved to investigate properly instead of paying a lawyer with no real authority or IT investigative skills $63,000 to find nothing except Coun. Sarai’s transfer of a confidential file to his home computer, which the lawyer then ascribed to “an error in judgment” on the part of the seasoned councillor. At this rate, we’ll never know who the leaker is, but maybe that’s the point.
LikeLike
Excellent questions! :)
LikeLike
Great points ! Why ?
LikeLike