LETTER – Reject the AAP for Build Kamloops, send in response letters

Conceptual drawing of proposed PAC.
Dear fellow Kamloops taxpayers,
As a member of the Citizens committee for open and transparent Kamloops city government, I am writing to urge you to send a response letter to city hall challenging the Kamloops city council’s use of the Alternate Approval Process (AAP) to borrow $140 million for a Performing Arts Centre (bylaw 57-1) and $135 million for a multiplex facility (bylaw 57-2), totaling $275 million of taxpayers’ dollars.
Our opposition to this process is based on several reasons. Firstly, the AAP process is meant for emergency situations, typically involving borrowing for utilities like broken water main replacements. It is not appropriate to use this process to bypass the electorate and approve significant spending without a referendum. This funding approach is undemocratic, unfair, and will be challenged by the citizens of Kamloops at the next city council election.
Secondly, we are concerned about the lack of transparency and oversight in this process. The previous city council’s decision to cancel the referendum during COVID-19 was understandable, but, AAP process lacks proper citizen-led oversight to prevent city administration from rejecting response letters and pushing the proposal forward regardless.
We believe that the council should present a reasonable proposal, including capital costs, operating costs, and a long-term business plan to be transparent about the projects, and put it to a proper referendum.
We encourage you to send a response letter rejecting the use of the AAP. The response letters are available at Kamloops.ca.
Lastly, we would like to highlight the misleading tax calculation presented by the council. The proposed borrowing of $275 million, with an interest rate of 1% amortized over 30 years, and a 10-year renegotiation period, would result in $70 million in interest alone. This information is not easy to find, but it was calculated using proper accounting methods. Moreover, if you multiply 47,200 households by $125 per year for 30 years, the total is $177 million, well short of the $275 million needed, not to mention the $70 million in interest.
Please join us in opposing the AAP process and the proposed borrowing by sending your response letter. Let’s ensure that our voices are heard and that our tax dollars are spent wisely.
GARRY DAVIES
Thank you for clearly articulating this issue of such frustration to so many in this city who have already voted against it—twice if I’m not mistaken. Opposition response sent.
LikeLike
Once, not twice.
LikeLike
Appreciate the correction.
LikeLike
here is the link.https://www.kamloops.ca/sites/default/files/docs/KAC%20AAP%20RESIDENT%20Elector%20Response%20Form_2024-07-29.pdf
the process is not that simple like voting . It took me some time to locate the document.
good luck
cooper
LikeLiked by 1 person
Please contact Mac Gordon. There may be a situation where the figures presented by the city, and the subsequent threshold are incorrect. That alone should invalidate this entire process as the integrity of the AAP is now in serious question.
If this is true, this is a Mickey Mouse AAP, overseen by a Mickey Mouse council that didn’t bother to validate the math.
What an embarrassment.
LikeLiked by 1 person