SUZUKI – A 2020 vision for climate action

(Image: Michael Gaida,

LET’S HOPE 2020 marks the start of a year and decade when we finally take climate disruption as seriously as the evidence shows we must.

We understand the problem and know how to deal with it. Many solutions exist and more are being developed daily. Consuming less of everything, including energy, rapidly shifting to renewable energy, and protecting and restoring green spaces and wetlands that store carbon are all things we’ve been doing and can do more.

We’d have healthier children, less risk of extreme weather­–related events like floods and fires, fewer refugees, cleaner cities and more sustainably managed resources. It’s astounding that anyone would oppose that.

Yes, people working in coal, oil and gas have legitimate fears about their futures, which is why they need support and training as the industry automates and transitions.

But we make it more difficult with every year we fail to act decisively. The talk is often of a “gradual” transition, the cliché being, “We can’t get off fossil fuels overnight.” That’s true, but it’s used as an excuse to avoid getting off fossil fuels at all. Through decades of increasingly urgent warnings from the scientific community about the dangers of pumping massive amounts of long-lasting greenhouse gas emissions into the atmosphere, many governments, including ours, have facilitated rapid expansion of the industry, especially for dirtier, less-efficient, harder-to-obtain products like oilsands bitumen.

Despite promises to stop, our government and others continue to massively subsidize the most profitable industry in history with tax breaks, reduced royalties and incentives. Governments develop climate strategies — many of them good — and then turn around and buy a pipeline or frack the hell out of the landscape.

It doesn’t make sense.

Looking south of the border and elsewhere in the world is even more bewildering. The U.S. president rambles incoherently about wind energy while rolling back decades of practical environmental laws and regulations.

Australian politicians reject climate solutions and promote the dying coal industry while evacuating their people from record-breaking heat and a country on fire.

What’s going on? Is it simply profit and greed? Fear of change? A lack of empathy and caring for the future? Ignorance? All the above?

Some people who oppose environmental protection believe it’s their religious duty to help speed the “end times.” Politicians on both sides of the U.S.-Canada border are known to follow these beliefs.

It’s absurd that people who believe God created the heavens and Earth would be so hell-bent on destroying all they’ve been given. It’s like burning down your house so you can speed your move to a new one that you have not yet seen!

Declining education standards, especially around critical thinking, have made many people more susceptible to the barrage of conspiratorial and other false information flowing through social and conventional media.

That information — from climate science denial to outlandish conspiracy theories — is intentionally produced by people determined to maintain their mostly unearned privilege no matter what the cost to the rest of society.

If we had politicians willing to act with the urgency the evidence shows is necessary, curbing climate catastrophe would still be a challenge this late in the game, but we could do it. We could at least start to ensure things don’t get worse than they already are.

We can and must do better. But it’s going to take more than changing our diets, buying e-vehicles and conserving energy — as important as those are. We must adapt our economic systems to current conditions and work on solutions that may not fit within the profit-and-growth paradigm, including massive reforestation projects, better environmental regulation, and education, strengthened women’s rights and family planning to stabilize population growth.

We can’t afford to squander limited resources for the sake of a seemingly endless cycle of working and consuming. And we can’t just keep polluting air, water and land and not expect consequences.

Some people may accept the idea of an apocalypse, even to the extent of praying for it and wanting to speed its coming. But most of us just want to live healthy, happy lives, where friends, family and experience mean more than money and “stuff.” We’re the majority and so must continue to speak out and speak loudly.

David Suzuki is a scientist, broadcaster, author and co-founder of the David Suzuki Foundation. Written with contributions from David Suzuki Foundation Senior Editor and Writer Ian Hanington. Learn more at

About Mel Rothenburger (7959 Articles) is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

2 Comments on SUZUKI – A 2020 vision for climate action

  1. Jennie Stadnichuk // January 8, 2020 at 12:30 PM // Reply

    Great article! Yes, our Capitalist economic system is the biggest factor behind the overuse and wasteful carelessness of society. I see young people around the world trying to voice their concerns about Climate Change! What I also see is that these wonderful, committed young folk lack the power for real change! Yes, the message is out there! Even those politicians in power can hear it! But, what significant change has been proposed by our governments? Even when young protestors are old enough to vote which politician can be trusted? Not the current Liberals, nor the B.C. NDP (ie the unnecessary Site C damn!). Trudeau has used 4 million dollars of taxpayers money as noted by Suzuki above. I agree our system of profit and greed must change and I’d like someone to theorize a system that might work in Canada? Perhaps we can look at Scandinavian countries for a model.

  2. Ian M MacKenzie // January 8, 2020 at 7:36 AM // Reply

    I know I’m in the majority, and, like Suzuki (who was my greatly admired genetics professor), am totally head scratching at the blindfolds that our politicians seem to be wearing. What other signs do we need in order to change our capitalistic policies to those that might mitigate the destruction of our world and civilization?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: