LATEST

EDITORIAL – Mayor needs to scrap new ‘working group’ system of committees

An editorial by Mel Rothenburger.

WHAT WAS MAYOR KEN CHRISTIAN THINKING?

That’s a reasonable question with respect to his reorganization of City council’s committee structure in January.

The mayor decided to get rid of the old system and replace it with five standing committees of only three councillors each, and about a dozen so-called working groups or engagement groups that report to the committees.

A working group is basically an internal staff committee while an engagement group includes members of the public. Some of the old committees were turned into working or engagement groups.

The change streamlined things because committees had become too plentiful over the years, but it’s created another problem.

Have you ever heard from one of those working groups or engagement groups? Have you ever attended one of their meetings? Have you ever seen their minutes?

Do you even know what these groups are called or who’s on them?

I’m pretty sure the answer is no to all of those questions and here’s the reason why. Under the Community Charter, City council committees must operate under the same rules of transparency as the council itself.

That includes publishing dates of meetings and agendas in advance, holding meetings in public, and publishing minutes. But these working groups and engagement groups are considered non-statutory, which basically means unofficial.

Not having committee status means they don’t operate under the same transparency guidelines as official committees. Hence, they operate in anonymity. Their advice may or may not be reflected in committee recommendations to the council but we simply won’t know.

One engagement group member described the new structure as “basically useless.”

The mayor needs to rethink his brainchild, re-engage the public as full members of committees, and return full transparency to the committee system.

Mel Rothenburger is a former mayor of Kamloops and newspaper editor. He writes five commentaries a week for CFJC Today, publishes the ArmchairMayor.ca opinion website, and is a director on the Thompson-Nicola Regional District board. He can be reached at mrothenburger@armchairmayor.ca.

About Mel Rothenburger (7044 Articles)
ArmchairMayor.ca is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At ArmchairMayor.ca he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

3 Comments on EDITORIAL – Mayor needs to scrap new ‘working group’ system of committees

  1. Power Nuts establishing control. Poor You. Where does this lead? I can guess, but can you?

  2. Tony Brumell // November 26, 2019 at 1:55 PM // Reply

    When I last looked ,transparent government was considered a good thing but the Mayor decided several months back that accessing his council was not to ne accomplished easily. The “Public Inquiries part of each council meeting is restricted to “Agenda Items ” only. Meaning thatyou can not access council without waiting several weeks and requiring a “Delegation ” status . So any item that may require quick action on councils part is not going to be heard. This is not open or accessable government and this working group scenario can keep important issues from public perusal.To regain lost credibility council and mayor must return to the long standing committees and forums.

  3. Committees made up of involved citizenry is the most natural and sensible thing to do if greater transparency is to be achieved. And again, given council is elected to represent the best interest of the community (transparency is the cornerstone of that, IMO) why don’t we ear more about these sort of things directly from them? Arguably, it seems as if the opposite to transparency is the ultimate goal.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: