McQUARRIE – The only good voter is an informed voter


WELCOME TO SEPTEMBER and the start of crazy season; that time of promises that will never be kept, misrepresentations, alternative facts and even outright lies that is otherwise known as election time.

Mixed in with the now standard theatrics of political misdeeds, name-calling and yet to be uncovered scandals, will be the obligatory call for mandatory voting. You are likely familiar with the messaging which always includes a dash of shaming, a pinch of nostalgia, a tablespoon full of war stories about the fight for democracy and a heaping reminder of the dire consequences not voting.

What no one ever mentions or even considers is, what if someone – and I can’t think of a delicate way to put this, so – what if someone is too ignorant to vote?  What if there are people out there who wouldn’t know a political party if it fell on them?

What if the only platform they are vaguely aware of is the one they stand on while waiting for Skytrain? What if they’ve never read a newspaper, listened to the news, watched a political debate or know the difference between the House of Commons and the House of the Rising Sun?

When we talk about mandatory voting, seldom, if ever, do I hear the word, ‘informed’ being used and that doesn’t sit well with me. If you aren’t informed, don’t know, don’t care and don’t want to know or care, then I say, don’t vote. I really don’t want those who have no desire or interest in contributing to our future to be part of the shaping of that future.

Do you seriously want to make not voting illegal for these people and if so, what is achieved by forcing them to do so? I see no up side to that scenario

There is another non-voter, though, that I would love to see back in the voting booth. This voter was once a regular, one you could count on to listen, question, discuss and come polling day, cast that ballot. They had a preferred party but by no means was that relationship guaranteed or blinded by a dogma that required unquestioning tribal loyalty on voting day.

But along the way, something went wrong and, gradually, the value of the vote was questioned more than the, who gets the vote. When the promises are as fake as those who make them and alternate facts are the illusionary, feel-good bromide of the day, it is difficult not to think that optimism has indeed become so old school.

Many politicians have learned that it’s okay to knowingly make election promises with no intention what-so-ever of keeping them. They’ve done it before without serious consequence and will keep doing until there is a consequence.  If the outcome of not being truthful is maintaining power and no one calls you out on it, then keep discouraging those who know better from voting.

And that is precisely why you must get back into the game and vote this October. After all, an informed voter is far more dangerous than any other voter.

Bill McQuarrie is a former magazine publisher, photojournalist and entrepreneur. Semi-retired and now living in Port McNeill, you can follow him on Instagram #mcriderbc or reach him at

About Mel Rothenburger (7715 Articles) is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

2 Comments on McQUARRIE – The only good voter is an informed voter

  1. An informed voter is an engaged voter. It is someone dedicated to ongoing information seeking, hungry for point of views and pragmatic. They will always be in the minority…not enough to put an end to the theatrical farce of election season.

  2. An “informed” voter’s vote is effectively cancelled by the vote of one ignorant voter or of a voter who actually believes that someone deserves one’s support because, after all, “he really does have nice hair”. I, therefore, question your conclusion that an informed voter is “more dangerous “ than any other voter. I would agree that the potential frustration of an informed voter exceeds that of all other voters.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: