Advertisements
LATEST

ROTHENBURGER – City’s Heritage Commission ignored out of existence

Communication between City Hall and heritage commission has been off track for years. (Image: Mel Rothenburger)

KAMLOOPS CITY COUNCIL could learn a thing or two from the fire at Notre Dame Cathedral. Within hours of the devastating blaze that destroyed a large part of one of the world’s most famous and revered man-made structure, hundreds of millions of dollars had been pledged to restore it. They care about heritage there.

In contrast, in Kamloops, City Hall has been waging a war of neglect and attrition against heritage for years or, perhaps more accurately, against the Kamloops Heritage Commission. It seems to have regarded the hard-working commission as a pain in the ass, and has disrespected it right out of existence.

The war was started under Peter Milobar’s watch and completed under Ken Christian’s.

Read More >>

Mel Rothenburger is a former mayor of Kamloops, former school board chair, former editor of The Kamloops Daily News, and a current director on the Thompson-Nicola Regional District board. He was awarded the Jack Webster Foundation’s lifetime achievement award in 2011. His editorials are published Monday through Thursdays, and Saturdays on CFJC Today, CFJC Midday and CFJC Evening News. Contact him at mrothenburger@armchairmayor.ca.

Advertisements
About Mel Rothenburger (6745 Articles)
ArmchairMayor.ca is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At ArmchairMayor.ca he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

2 Comments on ROTHENBURGER – City’s Heritage Commission ignored out of existence

  1. Having an appointed chair and fixed number of meetings is always problematic. Who is the chair beholding to? Will the chair go to bat for the committee members or a “higher voice”? There should be a minimum number of fixed meetings not a max. Sounds dictatorial.

  2. Heritage? One has to look at that totally heritage Allan Block wall the City recently commissioned at Stuart Wood to realize the “war” has been won by the forces of “neglect”…but there are more example of bad choices. What’s happening with the unnecessary cladding at the parkade on Lansdowne BTW?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: