Advertisements
LATEST

EDITORIAL – Leave Roderick Haig-Brown’s name on provincial park

Roderick Haig-Brown Provincial Park. (Image: Parks BC)

An ArmchairMayor.ca editorial by Mel Rothenburger.

EVERY YEAR, thousands flock to Roderick Haig-Brown Provincial Park in the Shuswap to enjoy the Adams River sockeye run.

That park will soon be no more — at least not by its current name — assuming that proposed legislative amendments are passed renaming it and two other provincial parks to indigenous names.

Roderick Haig-Brown Park will become known as Tsutswecw Park. It means “many fish” in Secwepemc.

As explained by Environment Minister George Heyman, it’s part of reconciliation efforts. The Haig-Brown family is reported as being just fine with the name change but I question both the change and the rationale.

Changing geographical names has, until now, been part of historical cleansing, aimed at those who were connected to the creation of residential schools, exploited First Nations or were arguable racist.

Roderick Haig-Brown was none of those. He was an outdoorsman, conservationist and prolific author. The park was named after him to recognize his work in preserving the Fraser River salmon habitat.

Two years ago he was named a National Historic Person, meaning that he’s recognized by the federal government as someone who is nationally significant in the history of the country.

I’m at a loss, therefore, to understand how erasing his name from the park and replacing it with an indigenous one in any way promotes reconciliation. Every part of the province surely has an indigenous name — using the argument that a particular place has historic and cultural significance to local indigenous populations could be extended throughout B.C.

But many non-indigenous people have done good things. They deserve to be honoured by having a park or a mountain or a river named after them.

There’s nothing wrong with a place having two names, by the way. Jacko Lake, for example, is also known as Pipsell.

So instead of erasing his name from a park that’s funded by all taxpayers in the province, why not call it Roderick Haig-Brown Tsutswecw Provincial Park?

That would be conciliatory.

 

Mel Rothenburger’s Armchair Mayor editorials appear Mondays through Thursdays on CFJC- TV. His Armchair Mayor column is published Saturdays on ArmchairMayor.ca and CFJC Today. Contact him at mrothenburger@armchairmayor.ca

Advertisements
About Mel Rothenburger (5769 Articles)
ArmchairMayor.ca is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At ArmchairMayor.ca he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

4 Comments on EDITORIAL – Leave Roderick Haig-Brown’s name on provincial park

  1. R A George // May 12, 2018 at 10:20 PM // Reply

    I personally am really getting tired of the word “reconciliation” along with ” closure “. At the present rate,it will never be either. Roderick Haig Brown it is and that,s the way it should stay.

  2. Joyce Alp // May 10, 2018 at 2:18 PM // Reply

    The names of the first people to this land should come first, Tsutswecw. I am sure Roderick Haig-Brown would have been honoured to be co-named with the first peoples, who were the first conservationist, environmentalists, and naturalists. We can learn pronunciation of any language, once we learn the phonetics. Tsutswecw-Haig-Brown Provincial Park.

  3. While I agree 100%, I wonder about the common sense of renaming anything anywhere with an unpronounceable word. But the awkwardness of “Tsutswecw” is only part of the problem.
    Given that it means “many fish,” it is also painfully lacking in creativity.
    Calling a river in these parts “many fish” merely draws attention to the fact that the indigenous people apparently didn’t get around much.

  4. I totally agree. However, if we keep on this bent perhaps they should change to another name for Vancouver!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: