LATEST

EDITORIAL – Whatever happened to saying nice things about dead people?

Fidel Castro in his prime.

Fidel Castro in his prime.

An ArmchairMayor.ca editorial by Mel Rothenburger.

IN CANADA, we have a quaint tradition — when people die, we say nice things about them.

In the U.S., apparently, they like to call dead people names.

Here at home, when Joe or Josephine passes on, we say they’ll be sorely missed, speak of their work ethic on the farm, on the railway, the accounting office, and so on.

If the material gets thin, we’re always able to mention their cooking skills or their love for bridge, the grandkids, weekends at the lake and their small white dog Mr. Snuggles.

When it comes to leaders, we eulogize them for their achievements in social and economic policy; we speak of their legacy.

In the U.S., especially if they didn’t pay appropriate homage, if their politics were different, if they stood up to American aggression, dead people are described as blood-thirsty tyrants who brutalized their own people. They are demonized.

And if you say something nice about them, in the Canadian way, then you are an idiot. Our prime minister found this out over the weekend.

At the passing of Fidel Castro, Trudeau issued a statement expressing deep sorrow, calling Castro larger than life, legendary, controversial, dedicated. For that, he’s being pillaged by American politicians and more than a few Canadians.

Trudeau didn’t mention Castro’s ruthless suppression of dissent, but try surviving politically and militarily when you have the world’s most powerful nation and most powerful armed forces doing their best to destroy you from 90 miles away.

Yes, Castro was a self-proclaimed Marxist-Leninist, and he made a terrible mistake with the Cuban Missile Crisis as he tried to protect Cuba from the U.S. And he did not bow and scrape to the U.S. as the corrupt and savage military dictator Fulgencio Batista and so many others did before him. And Castro humiliated the Americans at the Bay of Pigs.

The U.S. tried to assassinate him, invade him and bring him to his knees by economically isolating him, but Castro prevailed. Canada and Cuba have maintained relations the whole time, and Canadians have been travelling to Cuba for decades while the U.S. steadfastly stuck to its useless, counter-productive embargo.

American leaders and American media ignore the progress Cuba has made since Castro’s revolution, in health care, infrastructure, education, and economic diversification.

Cuba is not a democracy. It’s a tough country. It’s certainly not our kind of system nor our kind of country. Many people have suffered. But Cubans are many times better off today under the dictatorship of the Castros than they were under the dictatorship of the Batistas. Some day, maybe democracy will come to Cuba but it will be no thanks to the U.S.

So if our Canadian prime minister wants to comfort the Cuban people with some kind words instead of cruel insults, the Marco Rubios and Ted Cruz’s and Donald Trumps can put a sock in it. And we mean that politely, of course.

Agree or disagree? Vote in the ArmchairMayor poll on the Home page.

Mel Rothenburger's avatar
About Mel Rothenburger (11754 Articles)
ArmchairMayor.ca is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At ArmchairMayor.ca he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

20 Comments on EDITORIAL – Whatever happened to saying nice things about dead people?

  1. Hi Mel – I have to politely disagree. When the person who died is a major historical figure as opposed to a family member or local politician, it is completely within the bounds of good taste to comment on his or her legacy – be that Margaret Thatcher or Fidel Castro. But it is particularly appropriate when your own Prime Minister issues a statement purporting to be on behalf of “all Canadians” lauding a military dictator who repressed human rights and rejected democracy for 5 decades! I have no problem with Trudeau mentioning Cuba’s record on health and education but to simply say Castro was “controversial” insult our intelligence and integrity. My own column in The Tyee is here for those interested – it is not a polite view of either Castro or Trudeau: http://thetyee.ca/Opinion/2016/11/29/Trudeau-Praises-Castro/

    Like

  2. Justin: Better to remain silent and be thought an idiot than to speak up and remove all doubt!!

    Like

  3. Unknown's avatar Barrie Bolton // November 29, 2016 at 2:31 PM // Reply

    Mel, I mostly agree with you. There is no doubt Castro used despicable measures in the battle to take Cuba back from the personal fiefdom of the Batista ‘s the mob, and off shore corporate business. In forestry terms,”you can stop a forest fire by building backfires”. My feeling, this is what Castro and company did.

    Like

  4. Unknown's avatar alonzo smith // November 29, 2016 at 1:14 PM // Reply

    Alonzo, from Rockvile, MD. I wholeheartedly agree.

    Like

  5. Unknown's avatar Bronwen Scott // November 29, 2016 at 4:15 AM // Reply

    Thank you, Mel. Some people on this page seem to be lumping all communist-style governance under the same rock, but this is as ludicrous as saying all democracies are the same, even though we know that, to paraphrase Orwell, some democracies are more democratic than others. Cuba is not a corrupt system. It ranks near the top for education and health care, and the people are not prisoners–one of TRU’s most eminent scientists comes from there, goes back and forth freely to visit family, and has mentored Cuban science students here in Canada. In comparison, pre-revolution Cuba was being trampled by Battista, United Fruit, the mafia, and other unsavoury exploiters to the point that the majority of the Cuban people were hungry and dispossessed. Which is why they supported the revolution in the first place.

    Like

  6. Yes Camille the truth does matter, and where did Mr. Rothenberger lie. Cuban today is a better country than under Batista, better off because they didn’t Americanize. Seems to me any country that doesn’t Americanize are black balled and labelled incorrectly by the American Political Machine. Kudo’s Mel, Kudo’s

    Like

  7. Mr. Rothenburger, I’m sorry to say but you’re dead wrong in this matter. In your attempt to mainstream Castro’s past deeds and justify the Prime Minister’s obvious public relations gaffe, you overlook the intrinsic diabolic nature of communism and its proponents and the crimes against humanity that this malignant political aberration has inflicted since its inception. One party, one voice, one way of thinking for an entire people! A system kept in power in every host nation by a crushing repression apparatus. If you really think that “Cubans are many times better off today” thanks to the Castros/communism, maybe you should contemplate a year-long sabbatical in North Korea and upon your return write a nice “In memoriam” about Kim Il Sung. If you were to embark on this eye-opening experiment, I would definitely volunteer to pay for your plane tickets…

    Like

    • Adrian -what on earth does North Korea have to do with Cuba?? Have you visited Cuba? There is absolutely no comparison!

      Like

      • Cuba and North Korea are variations of the same system, Helen. The only differences reside in the degrees of the cult of personality dedicated to the leader of the Party and in how wide the window that connects these gulags to the outside world is cracked open. And yes, Cuba has nicer beaches and better weather, and projects a blissful image to the visiting Westerners. But try making a Kaepernick-like statement over there, and see what happens.

        Like

    • Unknown's avatar Bill Ligertwood // November 30, 2016 at 6:40 AM // Reply

      Sorry Adrian but that’s just an ignorant analogy. There is no comparison between Cuba and North Korea just as there isn’t between Canada and Russia. That is Mel’s very well taken point. The Cuban people perpetrated the revolution with Fidel as the leader. It was a very popular revolution with the support of the vast majority except of course for the oligarchs and criminals that had owned the country up until that point. Visit the place and you see how vastly ahead of it’s neighbours it is. The kids are in school not in the streets selling sticks of gum, they have free world class healthcare and education. Find another country in Central America that has anything close to that. You won’t. Why? Because for the most part they are american puppets who hide behind so called free elections while employing death squads to murder anyone who dares speak out including I might add nuns and priests. So please spare us your uneducated view of the world.

      Like

  8. Unknown's avatar Sean McGuinness // November 27, 2016 at 9:42 PM // Reply

    Fidel may not make it through the pearly gates, but Americans who celebrate Castro’s death should be reminded how their leaders and capitalists successfully banana-republicified pre-Castro Cuba. You wanna see a state mired in corruption with medieval living conditions for 90 percent of the population? Look at Cuba in 1958.
    Say what you will, but my hat’s off to Fidel and Che for the things they changed for the better; the younger generation may not like him, but they wouldn’t be around if he hadn’t saved their grandparents.

    Like

  9. Couldn’t agree more. Do people REALLY want to go back to the good old days when the Mafia ran the place?

    Like

  10. The milk of human kindness, Cubans remember Canada, we gave them milk for the children. Todo se resolves !

    Like

  11. You know Hitler is dead. What have you to say about him?

    Like

  12. Unknown's avatar Kathy McArthur // November 27, 2016 at 11:41 AM // Reply

    Well said! The ‘differences between our Canada and our closest neighbours get blurred sometimes, however being ‘nice’ has never hurt anyone … and I hope we (you) can continue to remark on and promote those good differences … maybe if we don’t ‘feed’ the negative it will disappear like that bad dream we don’t talk about!

    Like

  13. God Mel. I wish I was as articulate as yourself.I agree with you on this one, I wonder what our nemesis old J. Harrison would have to say about?

    Like

  14. Unknown's avatar Dale Shoemaker // November 27, 2016 at 10:52 AM // Reply

    Thank heavens for a sane reply, everyone seems to be making a political statement. We always say the best we can when someone dies, sometimes you barely recognize the person. The Americans have a different view, Castro didn’t do what they wanted.

    Like

    • Unknown's avatar CAMILLE B VILLENEUVE // November 27, 2016 at 11:30 AM // Reply

      The poll asks the wrong questions, they are not mutually exclusive. While it might have been APPROPRIATE TO RECOGNIZE CASTRO’S ROLE IN HISTORY, it should also be stated that HE WAS A TYRANT.
      Does the truth matter?

      Like

Leave a reply to Barrie Bolton Cancel reply