PETERS – We’re stuck with the bill for previous councils’ short-sighted water rate decisions
Posted on November 25, 2023 in Local Voices, Page One, Peters // 7 Comments
IT’S EASY TO UNDERSTAND why residents struggling in the midst of an affordability crisis might be more than a little miffed at the City of Kamloops right now.
If politicians can do little to control inflation — as has been made clear over the past years — they should at least attempt to control the costs that they set directly.
The city has to pay for decommissioning the Noble Creek Irrigation System, it has to pay for its own decision to eat a chunk of growth-supporting infrastructure costs and it has to pay for upgrades to the water treatment plant.
Not only that, city staff will be all too eager to tell you about the complexities of pumping water up into the hills and far reaches of this city.
For years, rates were kept either flat or at a minimal increase. We took it for granted that the water utility wasn’t costing us more money as time went on.
It sounds great, but it was actually poor planning. A strategy of slow and steady increases to build up reserves would have been much more prudent.
James Peters is the radio anchor at CFJC, coming to Kamloops in 2006. He anchors the afternoon news on B-100 and 98.3 CIFM, and contributes weekly editorials to the CFJC Evening News. He tweets regularly @Jamloops.
Share this:
- Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
- Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email


I agree with Pierre in the sense that it is a combined failure of both council and administration. The fact that council choose to go the debt route which will end up costing more money once all set and done is mind blowing to me. They should have just sucked it up and paid for everything up front like they originally were going to on the first vote in this most current saga. This city relies far too much on debt financing. If the savings fund for the new city hall would have been a thing, then we could have a nice new proper one by now fitting for a city out size. The fact that smaller towns and cities have better city halls then we do is also mind blowing to me.
LikeLike
We pay $10 million more on city salaries than Nanaimo which is larger than Kamloops and $10 million more per capita than Kelowna. We pay $25 million more per capita than both Chilliwack and Maple Ridge which are only slightly smaller cities. The 4 highest paid non CAO managers in the entire interior are all from Kamloops. Trawin negotiated all these contracts and recommended them all to councils which rubber stamped them, does he really deserve a raise form his $330, 000 yr salary? In 2007 our previous city manager, Randy Diehl, made $50,000 less than his counterpart in Kelowna, now the city managers make the same. Our city directors made $30,000 less than Kelowna’s, last yr they made on average $235,000 which was $29,000 more than their counterparts in Kelowna. Do any of these employees deserve further raises?
LikeLike
We may have different mayors and councillors but we have the same city managers who drew these plans and recommended them to council. When do they take responsibility, I suggest we start with freezing management salaries in the upcoming contract.
LikeLike
It’s not really fair to blame previous councils, since city administration told council in 2021 that the city’s water operating fund projection predicted a surplus balance of over $10 million in 2023, over $7 million in 2024 and $9.5 million in 2025. https://www.kamloops.ca/sites/default/files/docs/Financial%20Plan%202021-2025%20FINAL%20Combined.pdf
How can any council make a correct decision when given incorrect information?
LikeLike
Council doesn’t seem too concerned. I haven’t heard even a whisper about firing those responsible for those projections, or lambasting them for proving poor analysis.
LikeLike
How can the administration at City Hall justify their huge salaries? How can Council justify their decisions that led to wasteful spending like the $100K temporary stage that they voted for?
If you were paying someone $300K to manage your affairs, and they turn around and hit you with a 63% increase over the course of a few small years, add another 10% to your property tax, I think most people would be fired on the spot.
Things like this don’t just creep up. They happen due to mismanagement and incompetence.
How dare this council subject the residents of Kamloops to these outrageous increases, especially when people are out here struggling to pay the bills.
It’s too bad you don’t need to pass an IQ test, a management aptitude test, or any other formal measurement we have to test competency to become a city councillor. You just have to stand up, lie to the people, and you’re now in a position to take from them to fund your incompetent decisions.
LikeLike
The failure is a combination of council AND administration, mostly administration IMO.
And shouldn’t “development assist” be paid by development? Why should we subsidize development?
LikeLike