AJAX – City council reluctant to keep poking the bear on mine proposal

Councillors Lange, Dudy and Walsh.

City council decided not to poke the Ajax bear any further, though there was lively disagreement at Tuesday’s regular meeting (Aug. 29, 2017) on whether more poking is needed.

Two separate but related issues came up about Ajax, one on the recent release of a joint federal-provincial summary of the project, and another involving a notice of motion from Coun. Denis Walsh.

The discussion got underway when Acting Mayor Arjun Singh proposed that Coun. Dieter Dudy rescind a motion he made at the last meeting to invite reps from the B.C. Environmental Assessment Office to come and explain the joint report.

While Singh said he hasn’t changed his mind about the report’s deficiencies, he figured it would be best to proceed in a “respectful, calm manner” and lobby provincial and federal cabinet ministers who will make the decision instead.

It’s a matter of process that can be better handled through letters and phone calls, he said.

Dudy agreed to rescind his motion, saying the BCEAO’s job is pretty much done on Ajax, and now is the time to lobby the politicians.

“The assessment ship has sailed,” he said.

Coun. Denis Walsh opposed rescinding the invitation, saying the BCEAO “has some explaining to do” about the report. However, he was the only one to oppose withdrawing the request.

B.C. Environment Minister George Heyman has already turned down a similar invite to come to Kamloops to talk about Ajax, saying it would be “inappropriate” to engage in discussions at this stage.

When it came to asking the leaders of the three main B.C. parties to support suspending the Ajax process until changes are made to B.C.’s outmoded mining regulations, things heated up.

Walsh brought forward a notice of motion on the matter, supported by Coun. Tina Lange, who said it wouldn’t change anything but it was another way to express dissatisfaction.

Singh countered that it would be unfair to KGHM Ajax to try to change the process mid-stream, and it’s not likely to happen anyway.

“Unless you think it’s actually possible, why poke them in the head?” he asked. “Poke poke poke… It makes no sense.”

Lange took exception to that. “We’ve been very polite; we haven’t poke-poke-poked at all,” she said.

If it was being inflammatory (which is what Coun. Pat Wallace called it) “quite honestly that’s where we should be going to get attention,” said Lange.

“There has been some poking along the whole process,” Singh insisted.

Walsh’s motion was defeated on a tie vote.


About Mel Rothenburger (6121 Articles) is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

7 Comments on AJAX – City council reluctant to keep poking the bear on mine proposal

  1. Bill Hadgkiss // September 2, 2017 at 10:23 PM // Reply

    KGHM and EIEIO have been poking us for over six years. This process is annoying, I’m trying to be polite. SUSPEND the PERMITTING PROCESS.

  2. Poke, poke, poke away, I am disappointed that the BCEAO turned down the invitation to visit the city council. They have missed the opportunity to see first hand that most are operating on a personal agenda and not portraying the wishes of the majority of the population! Maybe they have realized that already? In any case, welcome to the change that is upon us!

  3. Cindy Ross Friedman // August 30, 2017 at 5:04 AM // Reply

    I truly wish I could have been there. I really enjoy watching democracy in action.

    However, I have been noticing that Council seems to deviate from process sometimes. One cannot simply “rescind” a motion. Once made, it becomes property of the floor, and a motion to rescind, properly seconded, needs to be voted upon. This is to ensure the Chair does not duly influence the mover (although it is pretty obvious that Arjun strives for respect and fairness, and doubtlessly was not pressuring factor). I love exceptions to rules, but the key is to acknowledge the rule in the first place.

    And I agree with Tina…make noise. I do not understand why people think that being respectful means being timid. There is nothing personal in calling out the BCEAO – Council is not saying “your mother wears Army pants neener neener” (sorry I never insult anyone on purpose so I have no clue as how to do it). Council is saying, “this proposed mine is unprecedented in scope and locale, and you need to hear those who represent 90,000 plus souls”.

    Neener neener?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: