Advertisements
LATEST

PIPELINE – Why Trudeau and Notley are right to support pipeline expansion

(Image: Kinder Morgan photo)

By KENNETH GREEN
Senior director
Centre for Natural Resource Studies
The Fraser Institute

VANCOUVER – The outcome of last month’s B.C. election raises serious questions about future energy policy in British Columbia.

The election produced no clear winner, although the New Democrats and the Green Party have agreed to unite with an eye on forming the next government. That’s where the questions come in.

Kenneth Green.

During the campaign, the two parties offered policy perspectives that were considerably more stringent on both energy and climate change than the incumbent Liberals.

A key element of the Green/NDP coalition is their opposition to the proposed Kinder Morgan Trans Mountain pipeline expansion, which was approved by the federal government last November after a review process that lasted nearly five years and imposed 157 additional requirements on the project. The new coalition pledges to use “every tool available” to stop the pipeline, including preventing additional tanker traffic off the coast of B.C.

We need the Trans Mountain project in order to protect the environment, keep costs in control, ensure the safety of workers and bolster the nation’s economy

In response, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Alberta Premier Rachel Notley have expressed, in no uncertain terms, that they expect this pipeline to be built.

The prime minister noted several important facts while maintaining his support. He recognized that the pipeline project was rigorously assessed by the National Energy Board and that elections don’t change the past. “Regardless of the change in government in British Columbia or anywhere,” he said, “the facts and evidence do not change.”

Notley made two important observations about the pipeline. She noted that provinces don’t have the right to negate projects that have received federal approval and that providing such provincial rights would damage Canada’s overall national interest.

But there’s still another reason why the Kinder Morgan pipeline (and several other proposed pipelines) should be approved: to protect human health and the environment.

In 2015, the Fraser Institute analyzed data from the Transportation Safety Board and Transport Canada, to assess the relative safety of moving oil by pipeline versus moving that same quantity by rail. The researchers found that while both modes of transport are overwhelmingly safe, delivering more than 99 per cent of product to market without accident, pipelines were somewhat safer than rail.

Specifically, pipelines were found to be 4.5 times less likely to have an accident or incident than rail transport. Moreover, 70 per cent of pipeline spills are very small, releasing less than one cubic metre of oil. And pipeline spills mostly occur at facilities – only 17 per cent of pipeline occurrences took place in the actual line pipe.

As for tankers off B.C., the Fraser Institute noted in a separate study that tanker safety has improved vastly while oil shipped by tanker has increased markedly. There has been no major oil spill in Canadian waters in 20 years.

Clearly, while all transport modes are needed and will continue to be used, the decision about which mode to use (after accounting for safety) should be more about economics and less about environmental superstition.

Pipelines aren’t only safer for moving oil, they’re up to three times cheaper.

Other studies have shown moving oil by pipeline is also safer for people – fewer workers are injured when moving oil by pipeline than by rail.

Whether you agree or disagree with their climate policies, you have to respect the strong resolve shown by Trudeau and Notley in advancing this pipeline project, particularly in the face of strong opposition from their own side of the political spectrum.

Of course, they not only should, they basically have to – both have staked their reputations, at home and internationally, on the idea that Canada’s implementation of stringent greenhouse gas policies would allow pipelines to be built and Canada’s oil resources to capture full value on hungry markets outside of the glutted U.S.

If nothing else, for the sake of showing the world (and its investors) that Canada can still manage to build important national infrastructure, the PM and premier should stay the course.

Kenneth Green is senior director of the Centre for Natural Resource Studies at the Fraser Institute.

© 2017 Distributed by Troy Media

Advertisements
About Mel Rothenburger (4927 Articles)
ArmchairMayor.ca is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At ArmchairMayor.ca he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

2 Comments on PIPELINE – Why Trudeau and Notley are right to support pipeline expansion

  1. Wow… shill much for the oil industry, does he? Kinder Morgan can barely get their IPO together… smart money is staying well away from this project. The author would be well-served to do a little reading about the carbon bubble and the exponential growth of cheaper, renewable forms of energy. Spoiler alert: it’s about economics more than climate… or anything else for that matter.

    If this pipeline actually gets built (a big ‘if’), I don’t expect it will ever pay for itself. And in fact, I fully expect it will be dismantled in a decade or two, and the metal will be used to make wind turbine towers and such.

  2. Lawrence Beaton // June 15, 2017 at 7:08 AM // Reply

    Well-written comment by Mr. Green. However, supporters of no-Kinder-Morgan pipeline would probable hang, draw and quarter Mr. Green, Ms. Notley and Mr. Trudeau for daring to support the project. In the opinion of those who oppose the aforementioned project, there is no room for discussion and or argument. I am interested in seeing what the Federal Government and Alberta does when the incoming government raises all sorts of objections to the project.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: