TAUBE – Future Tory leader must look to the past for role models

Stephen Harper. (Image: @StephenHarper)

THE CONSERVATIVE leadership race was thrown for a loop last week. Businessman and media gadfly Kevin O’Leary unexpectedly dropped out and endorsed former cabinet minister Maxime Bernier.

Truth be told, he abandoned his campaign for an odd reason: a lack of support in Quebec.

The next federal election is two years away, which would have provided O’Leary with ample time to sell his political message and improve his polling numbers.

Quebec also hasn’t been a major factor for several elections and right-leaning parties rarely do well there.

Plus, the Tories have figured out how to win without Quebec. The party formed two minority governments, and one majority government, with only 10 seats (2006), 10 seats (2008) and five seats (2011) in la belle province.

No matter the reason, O’Leary is gone and a more conventional candidate will be chosen.

Bernier, a Tory with libertarian leanings, is in the best position to win on May 27. Several consensus candidates, including Andrew Scheer, Lisa Raitt and Erin O’Toole, have a good chance of moving up the pecking order. And, whether you agree or disagree with Kellie Leitch, she shouldn’t be discounted.

Political insiders often state that the party membership will ultimately coalesce around a new leader after a long, difficult campaign. That’s the way it used to be. Today’s grassroots members and establishment figures are more fickle. They don’t always stick around if their chosen candidate doesn’t win and will abandon ship if they don’t like a new leader.

O’Leary could have seriously divided the Tories. Leitch could have a similar effect on party loyalty. Even the consensus candidates could ultimately turn off party supporters.

If the next Conservative Party of Canada leader doesn’t maintain and build on the Mulroney-Harper legacy, he or she is doomed to failure

No matter who wins, he or she will have to ensure the philosophies and ideas of two former Tory prime ministers, Brian Mulroney and Stephen Harper, stay intact.

Mulroney is a friendly and gregarious person. He enjoys meeting people, making small talk, and sharing stories about friends and colleagues. He’s a throwback to an era when politicians were human rolodexes who remembered names, dates and previous meetings with lightning speed.

This likely helped build his unique relationships with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and U.S. President Donald Trump.

The former recently invited him to speak to the Liberal government about North American Free Trade Agreement and Canada-U.S. relations. The meeting “was serious and substantive,” he wrote in an email, and they examined “strategic tactics and approaches that might be helpful as Canada prepares for a new round of discussions.”

The latter likely respects the fact that he’s a dealmaker – in politics, rather than business. For instance, Mulroney opted to “roll all the dice” (a phrase he later regretted) during the 1987 constitutional crisis, and ran an all-or-nothing campaign strategy during the 1988 federal election to get the original Free Trade Agreement with the U.S. signed.

Harper is a different person – and a different political animal.

He’s more of an introvert than extrovert. He prefers intellectual conversation over small talk. He’s not a bombastic character or public speaker/storyteller. He built a public image of someone who is strong, confident and no-nonsense.

While his leadership was divisive at times, Harper worked hard and refused to accept being second-best in any capacity.

He constantly thought about strategic communications, public relations and political tactics. His focus was on reducing the size of government, trimming the bureaucratic fat, lowering tax rates, introducing targeted tax credits, and transforming Canada into a leader on the international stage.

Mulroney and Harper’s personalities and leadership styles don’t necessarily complement each other. Yet they both wanted Canada to be more than just a mere middle power – and both believed this country could accomplish great things.

On many levels, they both succeeded.

The next Tory leader will establish his or her own political brand in short order. That’s to be expected. Regardless, the Mulroney-Harper line of leadership must be maintained – or else the political coalition will collapse in due course.

Political commentator Michael Taube was a speechwriter for former prime minister Stephen Harper. 

© 2017 Distributed by Troy Media

About Mel Rothenburger (9230 Articles) is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

2 Comments on TAUBE – Future Tory leader must look to the past for role models

  1. Grouchy 1 // May 6, 2017 at 3:16 PM // Reply

    I agree Miles. Harper came across as a dictator wannabe, totally unconcerned about the little guy. When taxes get too low, then social programs, and infrastructure suffers.

  2. Harper was toxic and shortsighted. He did far more harm than good to Canada. More of that will harm the conservative party and the country.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: