Advertisements
LATEST

To Premier Clark: Mineral Tenure Act must be changed to give municipalities more say

LETTER — Dear Premier Clark,

“I think the rules need to be tightened up …. I think we are at a moment in history where the way things have always been done for 150 years is now banging up against a new public expectation …. [people are] saying ‘That’s not the way we want it to be done any more,’ ” Clark said in a video interview posted to The Sun’s website Thursday. (Gary Mason Globe & Mail, Friday, April 11) (Rob Shaw Vancouver Sun April 4).

LetterLMs. Clark, you spoke these words in an interview with the Vancouver Sun regarding rules on MLA expenses.

How fitting these words are in regard to the 150-year-old Mineral Tenure Act. This act is also banging up against public expectation… the rights of the residents of communities to have a say on resource development in their communities, especially in the case of Kamloops, where the proposed Ajax Mine would be 1.5 km from the city’s newest elementary school, and newest homes.

In this example of “the way things have always been done for 150 years” 90,000 residents would be exposed to air, water, and noise pollution, for 1% of the city’s jobs. The medical health costs alone will be unaffordable as an increase of just one unit of PM2.5 will result in 11 deaths per year.

The Union of B.C. Municipalities Resolution B 80 requests that the Province of British Columbia undertake a broad-based public engagement process similar to that being used to amend B.C.’s Water Act and fairly engage First Nations and local governments to determine how best to modernize the Mineral Tenure Act and related legislation in a way that ensures the full range of interests – including social, cultural, ecological and economic – are given fair consideration on B.C.’s land base.

It is essential for the government of British Columbia to take immediate and decisive action on this important issue. Further development of mining projects close to municipalities, such as the proposed Ajax mine in Kamloops, need to be put on hold for a maximum of three years until changes to the Mineral Tenure Act are passed into law.

Your words, Ms. Clark, “I think the rules need to be tightened up… I think we are at a moment in history where the way things have always been done for 150 years is now banging up against a new public expectation … [people are] saying ‘That’s not the way we want it to be done anymore,’” need to be applied to the modernization of the Mineral Tenure Act.

If we are to believe what you say publicly, we need your support in acting upon the Union of B.C. Municipalities’ Resolution B 80. The revised Act MUST enshrine the rights of communities throughout B.C. to stop mining projects that will threaten citizens’ health and their environment.

We look forward to your reply.

MARY KAY & PHIL CLAYDON 
Kamloops

Advertisements
About Mel Rothenburger (6631 Articles)
ArmchairMayor.ca is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At ArmchairMayor.ca he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

3 Comments on To Premier Clark: Mineral Tenure Act must be changed to give municipalities more say

  1. Is it possible to create a new fair Mineral Tenure Act and make it retroactive as was done for the tobacco situation in June 2005 because of a possible drain on the Health Care System in the future?
    Are the possible effects to our health from a mine too close to our population also a concern to the same Health Care System?
    British Columbia v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd., [2005] 2 S.C.R. 473, 2005 SCC 49, is a decision of theSupreme Court of Canada where the Court found that the provincial Tobacco Damages and Health Care Costs Recovery Act, which allowed the government to sue tobacco companies, was constitutionally valid. Imperial Tobacco Canada is an indirect subsidiary of British American Tobacco.

  2. Good letter. I hope you sent this to other news papers and to Clark herself. The only reason I say that is I doubt she visits these websites in her daily routines.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: