LATEST

EDITORIAL – The OneBC event – what is the cost of freedom of speech?

An editorial by Mel Rothenburger.

FREEDOM OF SPEECH is a tricky thing. As we all know, it isn’t absolute, but we have to be careful when we get tempted to restrict it. We can’t do it just because we disagree with what’s being said.

The City of Kamloops, and City council, disagree with Dallas Brodie and her OneBC party, and made that clear in a statement released Wednesday.

“We do not support or condone residential school denialism, anti Indigenous racism, or any form of hate speech,” said the City.

“These perspectives are harmful, undermine reconciliation, and stand in direct opposition to the values of respect, inclusion, and truth that we are committed to upholding as a municipality.”

At the same time, the City said, it doesn’t have a legal right to refuse rental of a municipal facility — that facility being the Kia Lounge in Sandman Centre, though it wasn’t mentioned in the statement — to the party.

According to OneBC, the meeting is about such things as the party’s policies, UNDRIP, private property rights (a contentious issue that concerns many British Columbians) and “affordability.”

It’s true Brodie has been skeptical, and even mocking at times, of the suspected discovery of unmarked graves of kids who attended the Kamloops Indian Residential School and other such schools across the country. Empirical evidence has, so far, not been forthcoming. Brodie and others who think like her, want such evidence to be produced before they’ll believe in the existence of unmarked graves.

But that’s not denial of the bad things that did go on at residential schools. In the case of unmarked graves, the way in which skeptics express themselves isn’t always polite or pleasant, but the act of asking questions or expressing doubt is not, of itself, wrong.

At any rate, the City has gone out of its way to pre-judge what might be said at the OneBC town hall. Indeed, it may be that the event might attract some characters who use it as an opportunity to express racist beliefs, or encourage disturbance. In that light, the City’s concern is understandable.

Whether or not that’s enough reason to put a financial barrier in front of OneBC is a good question. The party responded with a claim today that the City has demanded an additional $7,729 security fee on top of the normal $583 rental charge.

At this writing, it’s unclear whether the town hall will ago ahead at Kia Lounge or some other venue Sunday evening, or if it will be cancelled. If the plug is pulled on the event, it will be unfortunate, because asking tough questions — even though they may be disagreeable — is part of the democratic process.

UPDATE: The City has cancelled the facility use permit for the OneBC event. No word yet on whether another venue will be found.

Mel Rothenburger is a former regular contributor to CFJC-TV and CBC radio, publishes the ArmchairMayor.ca opinion website, writes for the Kamloops Chronicle and is a recipient of the Jack Webster Foundation Lifetime Achievement Award, and was a Webster Foundation Commentator of the Year finalist. He has served as mayor of Kamloops, school board chair and TNRD director, and is a retired daily newspaper editor.  He can be reached at mrothenburger@armchairmayor.ca.

Mel Rothenburger's avatar
About Mel Rothenburger (11953 Articles)
ArmchairMayor.ca is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At ArmchairMayor.ca he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

4 Comments on EDITORIAL – The OneBC event – what is the cost of freedom of speech?

  1. I am saddened that the City Staff and Council are engaging in a program to tell us citizens what to think or to hear a counter opinion. They should be ashamed, though their coats of glorious virtue will preclude that. If you cannot allow the person who disagrees with you to speak their honestly held view, you are not fit for leadership.

    Ah, I see your point now. Only you get to determine what is an honestly held opinion.

    Like

  2. Unknown's avatar Walter Trkla // June 5, 2026 at 8:41 AM // Reply

    Mainstream Media, despite its self-image as free and independent, has repeatedly betrayed the public by surrendering to power, on international issues and sometimes on domestic ones, as they spin a political bias. During the Cold War, major media outlets actively fueled hysteria, promoted official crusades, and shaped Canadian (American) consciousness in the service of the state and political ideology , while pretending to uphold freedom of the press. This is fueled the present crisis internationally and domestically. Reporting is seldom ballanced and factual.

    Today, the press is once again in crisis, faithfully repeating those same lapses and betrayals; legacy/corporate media remain unreliable and compromised, leaving the public uninformed and vulnerable. The public’s naive belief in a free press is dangerous, and I see genuinely independent journalism as the only promising path to break this cycle and restore honest accountability.

    Like

  3. Unknown's avatar Pierre Filisetti // June 5, 2026 at 5:18 AM // Reply

    Truly another sober “take” on the issue. Thank you MR. She hasn’t denied the past she is just asking for accountability and she should. In fact that is the way it should be. Very many First Nations councils are clearly incapable to manage their finances and resources responsibly. The First Nations elites are doing quite well indeed but unfortunately many of their people are otherwise poor and destitute. There is nothing “racist” in asking where the evidence is, especially after very charged words have been used. There is nothing “racist” in asking where the money went. And we very well know the City of Kamloops and its management does not stand for truth and transparency.

    Like

  4. “The party (OneBC) responded with a claim today that the City has demanded an additional $7,729 security fee on top of the normal $583 rental charge.”

    … Bwaa ha ha … I didnt know that.

    City – Public Statement: “We dont agree with a lot this party seems to talk about, but saying no is a charter problem, so ya … ok”

    City – inside voice: “Sure, party on, but to keep ya’ll safe, we have to recoup security costs that dont really exist … at a grand total cost of $8,300+”

    City – outside voice “Where’d they go? Well … we didnt say no”

    Best 4D chess move we have seen this city make in years.

    Like

Leave a comment