LATEST

CHARBONNEAU – Anger, distrust are fueling anti-incumbent mood

(Image: Pixabay.com)

CITY-DWELLING CANADIANS have typically voted for progressive parties in the past. But that’s about to change in 2025.

Pollster Greg Lyle, president of Innovative Research Group, finds that some have shifted from identifying climate change or homelessness as a top priority. Instead, they are focused on the cost of living, increased stress about housing prices, food prices, gas prices and public safety.

Voters have grown impatient with Justin Trudeau’s Liberal government.

“People are not willing to support policies they’d supported four or five years ago. And Mr. Trudeau is still thinking it is four or five years ago,” said Lyle.

However, what voters are voting for is new. It’s not conservative. It’s part of a new wave that is sweeping the globe. I call it New Populism.

Vancouver resident David Fine is typical of the new mindset. He has voted for the Liberal Party in every federal election of his entire adult life. But he’ll take a break from that pattern in next year’s election. “This time, I don’t think I can do that,” he says.

Ironically, he’s considering a vote for a party he doesn’t particularly like. Fine doesn’t like the Conservative Party policies and he’s appalled by the promises from party leader Pierre Poilievre to defund the CBC.

But he is looking at the Conservatives’ policies on carbon pricing, the economy and social issues.

David Fine typifies global discontent.

Investigative reporter Doug Sunders of the Globe and Mail has been following global voting in 2024 and found a pattern. Last year was billed as the “year of the vote” since, for the first time in history, half the world’s adults in about 70 countries, would have the chance to cast a ballot in a national vote.

He found, with a few notable exceptions, that voters were generally in anti-incumbent mood:

“That global anti-incumbent mood, and the general spirit of popular anger and distrust behind it, has mystified many analysts and wreaked havoc in formerly stable democracies. In many ways its origins and causes are the central question of our time.”

The rise of New Populism is mysterious.

It seems to have roots in the pandemic when an inevitable, but seemingly unbelievable, global epidemic threatened world order.

Incredible events, like humans landing on the moon or passenger planes crashing into tall buildings, invoke conspiracy theories.

Many lost their jobs as the pandemic shut down the economy. People were forced to stay at home and wear masks when out in public.

They responded in anger to vaccine mandates. They didn’t believe that there was any threat to public health and imagined that the pandemic was conspired by dark cabals to control the world.

In our society that emphasizes the rights of individuals over the public good, they saw the dictates of government as a threat to liberty.

“Government public-health actions saved hundreds of millions of lives but seem to have turned large blocs of citizens, around the world, against whoever was in power,” says Saunders. “And it has been the power-seeking demagogues of the far right, in many countries, who have exploited that worldwide mood.”

David Charbonneau is a retired TRU electronics instructor who hosts a blog at http://www.eyeviewkamloops.wordpress.com.

Mel Rothenburger's avatar
About Mel Rothenburger (11571 Articles)
ArmchairMayor.ca is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At ArmchairMayor.ca he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

5 Comments on CHARBONNEAU – Anger, distrust are fueling anti-incumbent mood

  1. Much can be said about the salient points made in this latest op-piece of Mr. C. But I don’t feel writing too much these day. Although I too will for anyone wanting to cut the CBC budget by a whole bunch.

    Like

  2. Unknown's avatar Walter Trkla // January 3, 2025 at 6:39 AM // Reply

    Every society, including our own, has two foundations, one for domestic consumption “Western Liberal Democracy” (WLD), the official ideology, where capitalism and “free market values” dominate, while the other one is based on foundational myths or manipulated historical truth or simply ignorance of the truth. The winning ideology WLD is the myth, the one that perpetrators feed with manipulated historical truth which the bystanders ignore and the result is that we all become victims.  

    Once we look behind the façade, the foundational myth of the WLD ideology has been exceptionalism and its inevitable by-product – imperialism wrapped in verbiage, universal authority of the church, universal values, human rights, Nazis as superior race or freedom fighters, and globalization which has totally abandoned the human face of values and openly replaced without shame by “hatred” of the “other”.      

    And like all Western ideologies, the Woke ideology demands that you not only accept a lie (many lies, in fact), but that you also loudly proclaim it.  And, of course, the bigger the lie, the more vociferously it is proclaimed “Urbi et Orbi” (to the city of Rome and to the world a Sunday blessing where the very notion of “truth” has lost any meaning.  To repeat, while in the past the rulers of the West did proclaim and even impose ideologies based on lies, today these same rulers have basically retired the very concept of “truth” in any other meaning than “in agreement with the official party line/narrative”.

    We now live in a Clintonian ideology “I did it because I can” which world over applies to domestic violence, wars Iraq and Syria, and health vaccination, so bystander what are you going to do about it?  In other words, we openly live in living in a society based on: lies or even the repudiation of the concept of “truth” were violence and terrorism is accepted where “it’s okay if we do it, and it is not okay if you do it “which means superiority of the “we” over the “you”.  This is narcissistic in its mindset where we have rights which the other does not. This is based on internal and external – racism which is directed at any group or individual upholding traditional values and has become a core pillar of their worldview, where even the most brainwashed bystander is utterly unaware of it. We can write about it but most pretend they have the answers and don’t care any more.  

    The old cliché Mr. Charboneau about whether the dog is wagging its tail or the tail wagging the dog. What are we here in Canada Mr. Rothenburger and Mr. Charboneau a tail or the dog or does it matter?  In reality, this does not matter because the dog and the tail are one and the same and it loves you regardless of how you treat the animal organism because it has been bamboozled that you are the alpha male that it needs to follow. And the point is, therefore, not who wags whom, but what you conditioned the animal to achieve.

    Like

    • I don’t think it is possible for a tail to waggle the animal (even a dog) though…hence the “truth” is, science can only go so far at explaining “behaviour”. For everything else people should not believe all of the stories on the CBC nor the Globe&Mail for that matter.

      Like

  3. There are moments in time when actions not taken have a way of coming back with tragic consequences. Not removing Assad 11 years ago not acting when Putin blew up a Malaysian airliner., not arresting Trump for sedition on Jan.20, and Justin waiting for weeks to deal with the anti vaxers in Ottawa. The buzzards are coming home to roost.

    Like

    • Unknown's avatar Walter Trkla // January 3, 2025 at 12:22 PM // Reply

      Clint there are moments in time when we Canada took action as we did in Afghanistan, Vietnam, Iraq, and hundreds of other places and did not ask the question did we vote for this, or why do we lie about this and who benefits from this.

      The simple answer is ‘clintonian”, “because we can” and what are you going to do about it? Do you not see a pattern in your examples above? It seems to me the first corollary of this is that facts and examples simply don’t matter to you anymore

      Neither does logical analysis which requires an answer who benefited from Malaysian airline –Ukraine not Putin or Russia.

      Assad; Turkey, NATO and Israel benefit not the Syrian people.

      Trump for sedition on Jan.20 the Democrats and their Globalists.

      The anti vaxers in Ottawa told us which I knew a vaccinated person can get covid-19 and pass it on to others.

      Finally, please realize that blaming “Putin, Assad and Trump” for something require no knowledge, no expertise of any kind and no brains media has decided that for us. They are blamed like the Jews for everything. This is therefore something which the least informed members of our society will be very strongly drawn towards.  Again, just think about it carefully.

      Like

Leave a reply to Walter Trkla Cancel reply