LATEST

EDITORIAL – Do Kamloops council and staff have a failure to communicate?

(Image: Pixabay.com)

An editorial by Mel Rothenburger.

AT ITS TUESDAY MEETING, Kamloops council will have three options in front of it for an increase to water rates.

One is the 25 per cent hike council first approved, then rescinded — in the face of stiff public resistance — when Coun. Dale Bass switched her vote.

We should be clear that what’s being called a 25-per-cent increase is actually much more. It would be followed in succeeding years with increases of 15 per cent, five per cent, five per cent and five per cent for a total of 55 per cent.

But that 55 per cent doesn’t account for compounding, so add another 10 per cent to that. No wonder it wasn’t a popular move.

So staff have come up with a couple of other choices. One includes a rate increase plus borrowing for a water treatment centre project, which would end up costing more in the long run due to borrowing costs.

The third option is a combination of rate increases and deferral of a Westsyde water main upgrade but staff recommends against that one so it may as well not even have been included.

I’m curious about why this situation would have come as a surprise to anyone. The main reasons for the big water-rate increase are given as changes to the assist factor on water-related DCCs, and the costs of decommissioning the Noble Creek Irrigation System.

One might think staff would have presented options in the first place. One might think council would have asked for options right away instead of just going for the requested increase, then having to backtrack.

But, really, the questions should have been raised weeks ago during the never-ending Noble Creek discussion. In fact, the coming decision arises out of a very lengthy debate about that system at council’s last meeting.

Does anyone at the horseshoe ever ask the question, “how are we going to pay for this”?

Is there a failure to communicate?

I’m Mel Rothenburger, the Armchair Mayor.

Mel Rothenburger is a regular contributor to CFJC Today, publishes the ArmchairMayor.ca opinion website, and is a recipient of the Jack Webster Foundation Lifetime Achievement Award. He has served as mayor of Kamloops, school board chair and TNRD director, and is a retired daily newspaper editor.  He can be reached at mrothenburger@armchairmayor.ca.

Mel Rothenburger's avatar
About Mel Rothenburger (11747 Articles)
ArmchairMayor.ca is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At ArmchairMayor.ca he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

6 Comments on EDITORIAL – Do Kamloops council and staff have a failure to communicate?

  1. Freeze on ALL management pay raises in their upcoming contract would pay for this, problem solved, after all we are already spending $10 million a yr more on salaries per capita than cities like Kelowna and Nanaimo. Our payroll is $25 million more per capita than Chilliwack and Maple Ridge and both those cities only have 6 councillors.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Management raises are directly tied to union raises. Management negotiates union raises. Seems like a conflict of interest to me . . . :-(

      Liked by 1 person

      • Unknown's avatar Mac Gordon // November 20, 2023 at 3:48 PM //

        That’s not correct, the last contract Trawin loosely agreed to accept management raises equal to the previous union raises which he personally negotiates. This was a one time thing and is not legislated by the city. Previous management raises, particularly upper managements have been substantially greater than city union’s. Trawin’s salary went from $199,282 in 2012 to $314,673 in 2022, that’s a 58% increase or 5plus % per year.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Thanks for the correction and clarification. I went back to my source and told them this and they confirmed the last contract was as you said and further, that admin may set/agree to a certain raise but get more raises over the next few years if they go up a level in seniority/job description, so it’s possible to start out a term at one rate of pay and end up with a much higher rate of pay. There might also be a cost-of-living increase factored in there too.

      Like

  2. From what I’ve seen so far this term, it appears councillors don’t question administration about anything. They just seem to rubber-stamp anything admin presents to them. This not only makes them appear to not care about spending tax dollars, it also makes them look like they can’t think for themselves. How much $$ would taxpayers save if we didn’t pay a council at all and just let city administration run the city, since that seems to be the case anyway?

    Liked by 1 person

  3. It is certainly not a failure to communicate…the failure is much deeper than that.

    Like

Leave a reply to Mac Gordon Cancel reply