LATEST

EDITORIAL – By necessity, TRU probe leaves unanswered questions

A page from heavily redacted TRU report on misconduct allegations.

An editorial by Mel Rothenburger.

THE THOMPSON RIVERS UNIVERSITY report on allegations of misconduct against two of its senior administrators can be summed up like this: some allegations against one of them were substantiated, none of them against the other was.

Thus ends many months of speculation about who did or said what that resulted in 55 complaints against the two. The accusations included inappropriate comments about women in the workplace, personal harassment and a derogatory comment about indigenous people.

Ten of 23 claims against one of the men were substantiated. All 22 against the other were not. While the university has posted the 527-page, $1 million report on its website, most of it is redacted; page after page detailing the allegations is blacked out.

Read More >>

Mel Rothenburger is a former mayor of Kamloops and a retired newspaper editor. He is a regular contributor to CFJC Today, publishes the ArmchairMayor.ca opinion website, and is a director on the Thompson-Nicola Regional District board. He can be reached at mrothenburger@armchairmayor.ca.

About Mel Rothenburger (9358 Articles)
ArmchairMayor.ca is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At ArmchairMayor.ca he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

1 Comment on EDITORIAL – By necessity, TRU probe leaves unanswered questions

  1. Ken McClelland // January 18, 2023 at 8:23 AM // Reply

    So now both of these individuals have had their names dragged through the mud for a couple of years now, on what turned out to be largely unsubstantiated accusations of improper conduct. It is very strange to me that accusers can remain anonymous when their accusations turn out to be false, yet their targets are named the first day the accusation becomes news, or as it turns out, not news. But the damage is done.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: