Advertisements
LATEST

BEPPLE – Kamloops zoning bylaws encourage waste of housing space

Examples of narrow-lot houses. (Image: bahayofw.com)

EVERY DAY, there’s another story on affordable housing. There was the report this week that a worker in Vancouver needs to earn $35/hour to afford the rent of an average two-bedroom apartment.

It can take decades in most major Canadian cities to afford to buy a house.  And in a few short weeks, when Thompson Rivers University students descend on our city, there will be the yearly call for more affordable student housing here in Kamloops.

There seems to be constant talk about affordable housing. Again and again, there is a demand to build more affordable housing.

I’m more and more convinced that the issue is not affordable housing at all, but affordable zoning.

Every city defines land use zoning. Kamloops is no different.

Zoning dictates the size of building lots, how much unused space is required between the house and the road, and maximum amount of area buildings can cover a lot.

Zoning dictates which land can be used for single family residential housing, and which can be used for multi-family residential.

I only need to look at my own house, zoned RS-1, which is a type of zoning for single-family houses in Kamloops, to know that zoning takes away affordable options for builders, developers, and ultimately homeowners.

My RS-1 lot is 15 meters wide, the minimum width for this zoning. One could easily build a house on a narrower lot, but it’s not allowed in this zoning.

Even if a builder wanted to build houses on lots thinner than 15 meters, it wouldn’t be possible in this zoning. So if for instance, a builder wanted to consolidate two large lots to create three narrower lots, this zone doesn’t allow for it.

In the RS-1 zoning, there also needs to be a minimum six-meter front yard setback. All over Kamloops, there are large front yard setbacks. Perhaps this is needed to create parking in some areas, but in my neighborhoods, no one parks in their front yard: we all have an alley.

All through my neighbourhood, since water restrictions, this six-meter strip between the house and the road is being turned into a gravel patch with a few succulents.

There is no reason why all Kamloops housing lots need a six-meter front setback. Go to cities all over the world and one can find attractive houses with smaller front yards.

Wide lots, and six-meter front setback increase the size of the building lots.  Smaller building lots would allow for more houses to be built in the same area, and lower housing costs.

Housing costs are all about supply and demand. Zoning restricts supply by forcing all single-family housing to be built on larger than necessary building lots.

Kamloops’ zoning bylaws, and in fact most cities’ bylaws, encourage excessive waste of space.

The average household in Kamloops is 2.4 people, according to Statistics Canada.  Smaller houses, and smaller housing lots, are one piece of the puzzle in creating affordable housing for our ever-smaller households.

Without revisions to zoning bylaws, housing will continue to be unaffordable to many. Zoning is a powerful tool to allow people in our community afford to live here.

It’s time city council adopts affordable zoning bylaws.

Nancy Bepple is a former City councillor of Kamloops with a strong interest in community building projects.

Advertisements
About Mel Rothenburger (6879 Articles)
ArmchairMayor.ca is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At ArmchairMayor.ca he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

4 Comments on BEPPLE – Kamloops zoning bylaws encourage waste of housing space

  1. John Noakes // July 24, 2019 at 8:57 PM // Reply

    I commented about the downside of densification in a previous article.

    Lo and behold, one of the owners of the duplexes developed close by has commented that his hydro bill has gone through the roof since a large shade tree was removed on the fence line with an adjacent property. It seems that his densified duplex is not so green after all as the above ground structure is a wonderful solar collector. He pays a lot more for hydro to cool his place instead of relying on the natural air conditioning provided by a single tree.

    Not only that, where there used to be a green lawn and trees, there are now multiple vehicles which do not use carbon dioxide from the air but instead, produce carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide as well as other pollutants.

  2. Bob Gamble // July 24, 2019 at 6:15 PM // Reply

    Why do we need to be packed like sardines in a can? Last time I took the road to Lac Le Jeune or went up to Sun Peaks I didn’t notice a shortage of space to build on.

    Those moving up from the coast or other counties don’t come to the interior for the apartments and row housing. They come for the single-family home with the white picket fence.

    Sorry Nancy, most of us don’t want to live cheek by jowl. We only do it if there are no other options.

  3. The six meters strip needs not to be covered in pointless, ugly rock with few succulents…it could all easily turned into a productive garden producing an abundance. Densification has its drawbacks and there is a point where wealth redistribution of sorts may just be what’s needed to afford the “affordability”, never mind re-zoning.

  4. Ian M MacKenzie // July 24, 2019 at 1:54 PM // Reply

    Makes sense to me. We Canadians have been badly spoiled all our lives with the abundance of space when cities were smaller. Not so in Europe. World population continues to increase while the land surface area of the globe get’s smaller as seas rise. Either we use our brains more flexibly in zoning, as Ms. Bepple suggests, or we develop floating cities. Those adjustments are already part of European and Asian housing. It’s time for us to join them.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: