AJAX – TNRD to look into its jurisdiction on open-pit copper mine proposal

Drawing of proposed mine area that would lie just south of City boundaries in TNRD.

The following is republished from the Area P Post, a blog by Mel Rothenburger, Director for Electoral Area P in the Thompson-Nicola Regional District.

Director, Electoral Area P, TNRD

The Thompson-Nicola Regional District will investigate its regulatory authority in connection with the proposed Ajax mine project that, if approved, would be built within its borders.

At Thursday’s (Sept. 21, 2017) TNRD board meeting, Kamloops Mayor Arjun Singh made a motion, which I seconded, to review the TNRD’s jurisdiction with respect to the mine.

The motion came as the board discussed a presentation from an Aberdeen Residents Association delegation, which as Area P director I asked the board several weeks ago to invite as a follow-up to a letter of concern from the association.

Randy Sunderman, Helen Newmarch and Gina Morris of the association told the board they’re worried about the potential impact of the open-pit mine, which is proposed by KGHM Ajax just south of Aberdeen in Area J of the TNRD.

Newmarch, chair of the Aberdeen group, said there are “grave concerns” about the planned project. She suggested the regional district can regulate such things as waste rock storage, noise and dust through bylaws, and urged the TNRD to look into “full use of your capacity.”

I pointed out that on previous occasions when I’ve asked staff about TNRD’s authority with respect to the mine, the response has been that it has very little.

CAO Sukh Gill said Thursday there may be “limited powers” the TNRD can use because mining is mostly a provincial issue.

Asked by other directors about potential costs of investigating the TNRD’s role in approvals for various aspects of the mine, Gill said it would only involve staff time unless the board decides to ask for independent studies on such things as noise. (The TNRD has a noise bylaw, for example, but it’s currently aimed at controlling problems like barking dogs and loud music.)

Singh said the TNRD should seek a clear understanding of its jurisdictional authority as soon as possible. “Be prepared,” he said.

Lytton Mayor Jessoa Lightfoot said such projects need regulation and oversight and “people see us as the first step.”

In response to a comment about the fact a similar step wasn’t taken with respect to the New Gold mine, she said, “I think that we need to do better and not look at history as the standard.”

“These are people’s lives out there,” said Kamloops Coun. Tina Lange. “If something can be done it should be done.”

One thing that might come out of the staff’s look-see is a reciprocal bylaw agreement with the City of Kamloops, at the suggestion of Clinton Mayor Jim Rivett. Such an arrangement might make it possible for TNRD bylaws to be used to respond to complaints from people within City boundaries.

Singh’s motion was carried on a close vote. In essence, it’s an effort to seek information on what controls the TNRD can put in place with respect to the mine. It asks that the review be carried out between now and “the end of the mine process.”

A report from the staff is expected soon, which will hopefully outline milestones at which TNRD jurisdiction would come into play.

A decision on KGHM’s environmental-permit application is expected from the provincial and federal governments this fall.

About Mel Rothenburger (8658 Articles) is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

4 Comments on AJAX – TNRD to look into its jurisdiction on open-pit copper mine proposal

  1. Dale Sherstobitoff // September 22, 2017 at 4:44 PM // Reply

    Stop the red tape and get the mine up and running ! Stop costing taxpayers money and lets start making our city money instead !

  2. ajaxtoobigtooclose // September 22, 2017 at 12:01 PM // Reply

    There’s a bizarre and frightening inequity evident in TNRD, a regional government whose members are paid negligible amounts, with no advertising or PR money, attempting to defend and protect the well-being of its residents against a Polish mining conglomerate worth 30 billion $Cndn., and willing to spend as much as needed on PR and political influence.
    Perhaps Malcolm Gladwell’s commentary on David and Goliath is relevant.

  3. Bronwen Scott // September 22, 2017 at 9:21 AM // Reply

    What about thise statement in KGHM’s Ajax proposal that states, “the tnrd will be required to grant Ajax a Development Permit (TNRD Bylaw 1449)”?

    • Mel Rothenburger // September 22, 2017 at 12:02 PM // Reply

      The purpose of the review, which is based on the request from the Aberdeen residents’ group, is to summarize the TNRD’s authority, including permits.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: