Charbonneau — B.C.’s carbon tax is a work in progress

COLUMN — B.C.’s carbon tax is a good start; admired internationally and a model for others. Since January, France and Mexico have implemented similar carbon taxes.

North Thompson MLA, Terry Lake, likes the tax now as much as when he was Minister of the Environment. In his Twitter feed, he recently referred to a glowing article in the Globe and Mail, “The shocking truth about B.C.’s carbon tax: It works.”

CharbonneauhedThe article quotes the latest numbers from Statistics Canada that show the carbon tax has been a success for the environment and the economy. Carbon taxes have pushed personal income taxes to the lowest in the country. Taxing carbon has also reduced fuel consumption; down by 16 per cent in B.C. even as the rest of Canada went up by three per cent.

Lake, now Minister of Health, has reason to be proud. The carbon tax was a progressive idea from a government that has deep conservative roots. Contrast that with the federal Conservatives who have their heads buried in the tar sands. Prime Minister Stephen Harper repeatedly claims that a carbon tax would “destroy jobs and growth.”

“Far from a being a ‘job killer,’ it is a world-leading example of how to tackle one of the greatest global challenges of our time: building an economy that will prosper in a carbon-constrained world,” laud the authors. Since the introduction of the carbon tax in 2008, our GDP has slightly outperformed the rest of Canada’s.

However, the carbon tax is a work in progress and the government can’t rest on its laurels. Emissions must be included such as Liquefied Natural Gas which is about to metaphorically explode into production and spew out billions of tonnes of CO2.

Changes to the carbon tax have made it less fair to middle and lower income taxpayers. When first introduced, tax rebates went to 40 per cent of taxpayers. Since then, the carbon tax has tripled but the tax rebates have not, says the Canadian Centre of Policy Alternatives.

If the B.C. government is serious about meeting its own objective of reducing carbon emissions by 33 per cent in 2020 there is still some political heavy lifting to do. Furthermore, they are legally obligated to expand coverage to 80 per cent of all emissions.

Does the B.C. government have the courage of its convictions? Premier Clark’s goal of drilling for LNG will increase emissions by an estimated nine per cent. That’s before the gas is burned as fuel. Despite her claims that the clean natural gas will offset the burning of coal in target markets such as China, in reality the burning of our gas will add to existing global carbon emissions.

And while the Globe article gushes about our low income and corporate taxes, it would be a mistake to suggest that B.C. somehow operates on less revenue: the carbon tax, other taxes, and fees simply make up the difference.

The government should be applauded for the work it has done in slowing global warming but there is much more to do.

David Charbonneau is a retired TRU electronics instructor who hosts a blog at

About Mel Rothenburger (9358 Articles) is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

1 Comment on Charbonneau — B.C.’s carbon tax is a work in progress

  1. Lyman Duff // July 17, 2014 at 8:27 PM // Reply

    “And while the Globe article gushes about our low income and corporate taxes, it would be a mistake to suggest that B.C. somehow operates on less revenue: the carbon tax, other taxes, and fees simply make up the difference.”
    Maybe. Tell me then, dear David, how come ministries like the environment and forestry get their budgets continually cut. Less research and less monitoring does not bode well for our collective future.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: