LATEST

EDITORIAL – Making decisions now vs. kicking the can to the next council

(Image: Mel Rothenburger file photo)

An editorial by Mel Rothenburger.

THIS TIME OF YEAR, an election year that is, City councils often wrestle with whether to make decisions now or take the lame duck approach and kick them down the road until after the transition.

A couple of such instances came up Tuesday (Aug. 12, 2026) in Kamloops council chambers. One was the contentious issue of whether to put borrowing for a new RCMP building to referendum along with the Oct. 17 civic election, or put it off until next year and use an Alternative Approval Process poll.

It was a double-edged question. One was whether to use a referendum, and save costs by pairing it with the election and getting the decision made, versus delaying said decision until next year.

The other was using an AAP instead of a referendum.

Council was divided on both aspects. Some wanted a referendum, which meant a quicker resolution to the matter, while others wanted an AAP, which would result in delay. And some of the arguments were convoluted.

Coun. Dale Bass, for example, insisted that council must decide now rather than tarry, because the City risks the feds stepping in and doing the build, then billing City taxpayers. Yet she supported putting it off in order to employ the AAP.

Stephen Karpuk liked the referendum idea but his thinking was aligned with Bass.

Coun. Katie Neustaeter argued that the public clearly doesn’t like the use of the AAP method and that it should go to referendum.

And others seemed befuddled about the possibility of changing locations or chances of cutting the currently estimated $160-million bill.

Then, of course, there was the matter of whether leaving it for the next council to decide would simply be best. Indeed, it was clarified that the next council could make an entirely different decision, including switching from an AAP to a referendum in 2027.

All, however, agreed that a new building is needed. In the end, the vote was 5-3 in favour of waiting for an AAP, a slight realignment from the committee of the whole meeting in which the vote was 5-4. This time, Coun. Bepple was absent and Karpuk voted in favour; in committee, Bepple was in favour and Karpuk against.

The other issue that brought up the matter of timing was a staff recommendation to switch from a remuneration policy to a remuneration bylaw. Included would be a raise in councillors’ expense allowance and a provision giving the City authority to dock the pay of any council member who owes money to the City.

Media have speculated that the latter provision is aimed at Mayor Reid Hamer-Jackson, who continues to be in legal conflict with Neustaeter, and who owes the City property taxes. Neustaeter recused herself from the debate but Hamer-Jackson didn’t, reasoning that if he has to pay legal costs, they will be owed to Neustaeter, not the City.

He tried to get the matter postponed to the next council, saying it’s only a couple of months until election day and it would make sense to let the new council decide. He failed in the attempt, and the bylaw received first readings.

There can be both logical and political reasons for putting off decisions this close to an election. Common sense dictates that a council is elected to serve until its term expires and should carry on as if no election is looming. But it’s often convenient for councils to delay decisions on controversial issues so incumbents don’t have to face any fallout during the election campaign.

In other cases, when a decision directly impacts the operation of the next council, or when there’s no particular reason to rush, it makes sense to postpone.

And, sometimes, one reason is used as an excuse for the other.

Mel Rothenburger is a former regular contributor to CFJC-TV and CBC radio, publishes the ArmchairMayor.ca opinion website, writes for the Kamloops Chronicle and is a recipient of the Jack Webster Foundation Lifetime Achievement Award, and was a Webster Foundation Commentator of the Year finalist. He has served as mayor of Kamloops, school board chair and TNRD director, and is a retired daily newspaper editor.  He can be reached at mrothenburger@armchairmayor.ca.

Mel Rothenburger's avatar
About Mel Rothenburger (12045 Articles)
ArmchairMayor.ca is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At ArmchairMayor.ca he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

3 Comments on EDITORIAL – Making decisions now vs. kicking the can to the next council

  1. Unknown's avatar Bronwen Scott // August 12, 2026 at 8:47 PM // Reply

    Council’s excuse for using an AAP to get voters’ “approval” for the PAC and rinks was that an AAP is much cheaper than a referendum.

    How can council now justify sending the RCMP loan request to AAP next year when holding a referendum at the same time as this fall’s election would be much cheaper than a separate AAP, especially as time is now of the essence?

    The unnecessary delay occurred because in 2023 the councillors abandoned the RCMP issue in favour of the PAC and rinks. Throughout the entire previous term, a new RCMP building had been a major topic of discussion for the Mayor’s Standing Committee on Development, which the councillors disbanded to spite the new mayor, creating Build Kamloops in its place.

    It’s worth noting that Mike O’Reilly was chair of the Development Committee and then chair of Build Kamloops, so the looming RCMP need was well known. Perhaps City admin also needs to take some of the blame. They’re supposed to ensure continuity and advise council on major issues–what happened in this case?

    As for further delaying the decision: Do the councillors all secretly believe, as Coun. Bepple said out loud, that voters would be confused (read: are too stupid) to understand that they have a referendum question to answer at the same time that they elect a new council? Or are they just passing the buck after what appears to be their grievous mishandling of the issue?

    Since council has now handed the problem off to the next council, then perhaps that (hopefully all new) council can consult with the public and revisit other options before we tear down a 35-year-old building, which seems wasteful and unthrifty.

    Like

    • Unknown's avatar Pierre Filisetti // August 13, 2026 at 5:28 AM // Reply

      The administration needs to take some of the blame? I think they are the ones causing confusion and delays and all the fracas at City Hall. Your very own previous experience dealing with them should be more than plenty of evidence on the “blame” percentage. Nothing like having an easy sway when dealing with the Bepples et al…

      Liked by 1 person

    • Unknown's avatar John Noakes // August 13, 2026 at 6:07 AM // Reply

      Castanet Kristen has cleared up everything about the text stuff. It was the fault of the elected Mayor.

      It’s only a matter of time until Kristen provides a rock solid justification for the use of AAPs. It might come down to the ineptness of the voters being able to both vote for candidates in the election and also clearly understand that there is also a referendum to approve or disapprove borrowing for a new RCMP headquarters.

      Like

Leave a comment