LATEST

EDITORIAL – The ‘must be approved and funded’ rule for big projects is dumb

Groundbreaking at site of new performing arts theatre. (Image: Mel Rothenburger)

An editorial by Mel Rothenburger.

‘APPROVED AND FUNDED.’ Those words are heard whenever the question is asked, “Will any senior-government grants be available for this project?”

The answer is that until a project is “approved and funded,” applications for grants can’t be made.

This is a strange rule. Major municipal infrastructure, such as arenas or theatres or police buildings, are generally funded from a combination of three sources: donations, local debt gradually repaid through taxation, and grants from federal and/or provincial governments.

Under the “approved and funded” rule, a municipality must take a (hopefully) educated guess at how much money might be available through grants. For example, the performing arts theatre will be funded with a maximum of $140 million in local borrowing. That was approved through a controversial alternative approval process, without knowing how much, if any, federal or provincial funding would be available, even though the total budget is estimated at $211 million.

Last week, the City learned that the project will receive $7 million in federal funding, the maximum allowable in the program for which the City applied. It might have been less, or nothing at all.

An APP next year will seek approval of up to $160 million in funding for a new police building. Will senior government grants be available to help defray the cost to local taxpayers? Don’t know. The project has to be “approved and funded” first.

The problem with this rule is that local taxpayers don’t know how much they’re in for. If they approve the borrowing ask, they have to hope there will be other sources of funding that come forward to help out. It’s a bit of a pig in a poke.

If donations and senior government grants don’t fill the void, the municipality must either cut corners on the project or go back to the taxpayers and ask for more money.

There’s nothing City councils can do about it but it’s a dumb system.

Mel Rothenburger is a former regular contributor to CFJC-TV and CBC radio, publishes the ArmchairMayor.ca opinion website, writes for the Kamloops Chronicle and is a recipient of the Jack Webster Foundation Lifetime Achievement Award, and was a Webster Foundation Commentator of the Year finalist. He has served as mayor of Kamloops, school board chair and TNRD director, and is a retired daily newspaper editor.  He can be reached at mrothenburger@armchairmayor.ca.

Mel Rothenburger's avatar
About Mel Rothenburger (12029 Articles)
ArmchairMayor.ca is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At ArmchairMayor.ca he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

1 Comment on EDITORIAL – The ‘must be approved and funded’ rule for big projects is dumb

  1. Unknown's avatar John Noakes // August 6, 2026 at 6:39 AM // Reply

    Had the PAC been built as a joint venture with our indigenous family members as the Performing Arts and Cultural Centre, the Federal government may have provided a lot more than $7 million .  The PAC was destined to be built downtown come hell or high water.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment