LATEST

EDITORIAL – O’Reilly must clear up the mystery surrounding mayor’s texts

Coun. Mike O’Reilly

An editorial by Mel Rothenburger.

THE MAN WHO wants to be the next mayor owes the people of Kamloops an explanation.

Coun. Mike O’Reilly needs to explain how, as deputy mayor for June, he didn’t know he’d have to chair Tuesday’s City council meeting in the absence of the mayor. There was a bit of a fuss before the meeting got started, late, checking to see if the mayor was on Zoom, or maybe had trouble finding a parking spot (even though the mayor has a reserved spot right outside council chambers).

Then he announced that the mayor was absent and that no word had been received from him that he’d be missing the meeting, or why. “I have not received confirmation from Mayor Hamer-Jackson electronically that I will be needed to chair this meeting,” he said.

With that, he briefly adjourned the meeting so he could prepare.

Yet, Mayor Reid Hamer-Jackson has copies of texts he sent O’Reilly asking him to chair the meeting because he was with his ill wife at Royal Inland Hospital.

Obviously, O’Reilly hadn’t seen the emails. There are limited reasons this could have happened.

  1. for some technological reason, he didn’t receive them.
  2. the mayor’s texts were blocked.
  3. he received them but didn’t read them.

It’s no secret that O’Reilly and Hamer-Jackson don’t communicate well. Hamer-Jackson’s messages to the councillor are often followed up with further messages of the “why don’t you answer me?” variety.

Coun. Dale Bass was once quoted as saying she and other councillors sometimes ignore things given them by the mayor.

So let’s get it cleared up. O’Reilly has a responsibility to find out what went wrong on Tuesday, and why. If he never received the messages from the mayor, he needs to get the teckies at City Hall on the case.

If there was some other reason, he should say so. This incident was an embarrassment, and it’s particularly sensitive because of the fact O’Reilly is campaigning to defeat Hamer-Jackson in this year’s civic election.

And, as deputy mayor for the month, he should have made certain that a message of well wishes was sent from City Hall to Hamer-Jackson and his wife Lori. That’s what leadership looks like.

Mel Rothenburger is a former regular contributor to CFJC-TV and CBC radio, publishes the ArmchairMayor.ca opinion website, writes for the Kamloops Chronicle and is a recipient of the Jack Webster Foundation Lifetime Achievement Award, and was a Webster Foundation Commentator of the Year finalist. He has served as mayor of Kamloops, school board chair and TNRD director, and is a retired daily newspaper editor.  He can be reached at mrothenburger@armchairmayor.ca.

Mel Rothenburger's avatar
About Mel Rothenburger (11973 Articles)
ArmchairMayor.ca is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At ArmchairMayor.ca he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

7 Comments on EDITORIAL – O’Reilly must clear up the mystery surrounding mayor’s texts

  1. The individual who didn’t see the texts is the same guy running against RHJ. I call BS. This guy can’t be trusted, his ethics are questionable by his statement in council.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. Unknown's avatar John Noakes // June 30, 2026 at 6:38 AM // Reply

    Mel, are you sure you aren’t mistaken about this?

    There is a fellow named Mike O’Reilly who has a pop-up ad that indicates he is running for Mayor.

    The wording from his ad:  Putting Kamloops first. Provide input, share feedback, and help shape the future of our community.  Join the conversation.

    Mel, are you sure you aren’t mistaken about this?  The fellow who is running for Mayor wants people to believe he would like input, he wants to share feedback and wants us to help shape the future of our community.  AND, he would like us to JOIN THE CONVERSATION.

    Mel, are you sure you aren’t mistaken about this?  How can the Mike O’Reilly who is running for Mayor be the same Mike O’Reilly who won’t answer you about a couple of simple text messages?

    As Bronwen suggested, it’s time we had some clarification about the real Mike O’Reilly.

    Like

  3. Unknown's avatar Gordon Cameron // June 28, 2026 at 9:05 PM // Reply

    “O’Reilly must clear up the mystery surrounding mayor’s texts?” Seems like a pretty leading headline for the Armchair Mayor. Were you not an editor at one point? There are two people in this story.

    Like

    • Unknown's avatar Mel Rothenburger // June 28, 2026 at 9:11 PM // Reply

      Yes, and Coun. O’Reilly has not responded to requests to explain what happened.

      Like

    • Unknown's avatar Bronwen Scott // June 29, 2026 at 1:38 PM // Reply

      From the story:

      “Mayor Reid Hamer-Jackson has copies of texts he sent O’Reilly asking him to chair the meeting.” So, one person has already responded to Mel regarding this mysterious situation.

      So far, Coun. O’Reilly has not responded to Mel’s questions, thus the continuing mystery which only Coun. O’Reilly can help to solve.

      That’s the attempt to get the input of the two people involved. No need to cast aspersions on Mel’s unbiased reporting, especially since it’s so rare in the community at present.

      Like

  4. This could have all been avoided if the mayor would have simply notified his executive assistant who then could have relayed the message to council and staff, after all that is the job of the executive assistant. But like much of the mayors salary, access to the his executive assistant has also been stripped, so what would have been a normal conduit from the the mayor to council has been blocked, similar to how O’Reilly’s text messages from the mayor apparently are.

    Put this in the overcrowded loss column for council.

    No Incumbents!

    Liked by 3 people

  5. Unknown's avatar Bronwen Scott // June 27, 2026 at 8:19 AM // Reply

    It’s too bad when a mayoral candidate’s ethics or actions are questioned a few months before an election.

    It’s really too bad when the person doing the questioning is also a mayoral candidate and doing the questioning in an official council capacity.

    It reeks, actually.

    This situation strongly calls for clarification.

    Like

Leave a comment