LATEST

CITY COUNCIL – Residents will get a chance to weigh in on shelter extension

Butler Auto property before conversion to an emergency shelter. ((Image: Mel Rothenburger)

Residents will get a chance to weigh in on whether a controversial emergency shelter in the Tranquille Road shopping area will stay open for three more years. City council decided today (March 10, 2026) to call a public input session but not before another blowup between Mayor Reid Hamer-Jackson and other councillors and staff.

After that was over with, the council engaged in an hours-long debate over what the format for public input should be, finally deciding the mayor should call a special council meeting at a yet-to-be determined date.

The former Butler Auto & RV commercial property on which the shelter is located, 142 Tranquille Road, was given a 20-month temporary use permit in November 2024. It will expire July 26 this year.

Called the Pathways Shelter, it provides 44 beds on a 24/7 basis and is funded through BC Housing’s Homelessness Encampment Action Response to Temporary Housing program. It also provides health, cultural and housing supports.

Today’s confrontation between the mayor and others in council chambers centred on the question of whether Hamer-Jackson has a conflict of interest in dealing with the shelter decision due to the fact he has legal proceedings against Joshua Knaak of Arpa Investments, owner of the Butler property.

As the item came up on the agenda, corporate officer Maria Mazzotta began to ask Hamer-Jackson a question but he quickly cut her off, saying, “I’ve got a legal opinion; I’m not in conflict.”

“We understand that you are no longer legally represented,” said Mazzotta.

“How do you know I’m not legally represented?” the mayor demanded, asking if it was based on media reports.

When Mazzotta acknowledged that her understanding was partly from the media, Hamer-Jackson said, “I will tell you I do have legal representation.”

The exchange then got sidetracked regarding the council’s code of conduct. At one point, he tried to rule Coun. Dale Bass out of order but she shot back, “No, you’re out of order because you’re slandering me.”

When the mayor threatened to have her removed from the meeting, she replied, “You will be sued.”

On a motion from Coun. Stephen Karpuk, and advice from Mazzotta, Hamer-Jackson was removed from chambers while council voted on whether to uphold the mayor’s point of order ruling. Council said no.

“I’m tired of that guy,” Bass remarked.

With the mayor back in the room, discussion got down to the question of council giving the public notice it would be considering a three-year extension on the temporary use permit. Coun. Mike O’Reilly recused himself because he said he has a business relationship with one of the directors of Arpa.

While there was agreement that the public deserved to be heard, agreement on how that would come about was harder to come by. Some council members wanted a “town hall” style meeting, some wanted input only through the normal public submissions process, some a special meeting of council. Coun. Katie Neustaeter wanted the security and safety committee, of which she is chair, to “host” a meeting.

And there was more disagreement about what a point of order entails.

Finally, Mazzotta suggested the mayor call a special meeting and that a date and venue be decided, likely in April. That didn’t require a council vote so the debate ended there.

The shelter site has been enhanced with fire safety systems, controlled access, perimeter fencing, lighting, security cameras, on-site laundry, and creation of amenity spaces, secure storage and office space at a cost of $3.5 million, plus $2.6 million in operating costs. An onsite food truck provides meals.

Conversion of the site for the shelter was initially met with divided opinion, with some people in support and others very much opposed. Those differences continue.

The shelter has operated at a 95 per cent occupancy rate, with 304 people accessing it. The report said the shelter is monitored by ASK Wellness and the City to address concerns of the public and businesses.

“It is recognized that shelters can attract congregation nearby, which can be challenging for surrounding residents and businesses,” it says. “Such congregation should not be interpreted solely as nuisance or criminal behaviour, but as a response to limited safe and accessible spaces.”

Perimeter checks of the site are done five times per day, and community service officers patrol the area every four hours.

Social, housing and community development manager Natasha Hartson remarked that an emergency shelter is only a “band-aid” solution but “removing the band-aid doesn’t solve the wound.”

Mel Rothenburger's avatar
About Mel Rothenburger (11798 Articles)
ArmchairMayor.ca is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At ArmchairMayor.ca he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

4 Comments on CITY COUNCIL – Residents will get a chance to weigh in on shelter extension

  1. Unknown's avatar clintprice // March 11, 2026 at 9:07 PM // Reply

    Is the owner of the property going to reimburse the City or Province for any infrastructure improvements installed by the tax payer, that will service his property when he decides to build a housing unit on it . Developers in this town are not acting like grown ups and paying their way. It’s no taxpayer subsidy no building according to these “benefactors”

    Like

  2. Excellent article at NP today about “safe” injection sites. The article goes into the data and points out yet again that proponents of sites that promote drug abuse under the guise of “safe” do not improve outcomes. Another common refrain by proponents of these and other facilities is that overdoses will increase. The data does not support that. Derek Finkle wrote extensively on a Toronto safe injection site scandal that led to the death of a woman living close by in the neighborhood.

    Encourage all to give this a read a reminder than the term “homelessness” and “unhoused” is a euphemism for drug addiction and abuse. The euphemism is used by proponents to distract from the core issue.

    https://nationalpost.com/opinion/derek-finkle-this-injection-site-was-shut-down-what-followed-proved-activists-wrong

    Like

  3. Unknown's avatar Pierre Filisetti // March 11, 2026 at 6:28 AM // Reply

    The nightmare on Tranquille has materialized despite all the fanfare to the contrary. So supposedly 16 “success” stories have been documented. But a greater number of regular folks who use the area or make a living in the area or have a small business in the area have been seriously impacted. This is no success and it is absurd to call it so.

    But what is with this “confit of interest” BS? Where is the financial or any other gain that RHJ can gain from being active participant on these discussions? As an elected member to council he should be able to do exactly so.
    Lastly, I have read in the local media somewhere that the owners of the old Interior Motorcycle location (not Butler RV) charge the province 30K per month for that patch of derelict real estate. Is that fair? And on top of that, how much did the province spent to have it ready knowing full well it was going to be temporary?

    I am very tired of Dale Bass.

    Like

    • I found Bepple’s comments calling this a resounding success to be completely biased and wilfully ignorant of the harm caused to businesses and residents. How do businesses feel about that comment? The businesses losing thousand of dollars a month from shoplifting and damage to property, to say nothing of the environment that is keeping customers away. Every single one of these sites attracts crime like a magnet.

      We don’t need people like this on council. Bepple will put drug addicts above the taxpayer base that pays for those addicts to continue their drug and crime binges. She is an ardent supporter of safe supply, wet shelters embedded in neighborhoods and safe injection sites – as if anything about abusing meth and fentanyl is safe. To willingly encourage people to do great harm to their bodies and minds via drugs is absolutely nuts. All of this is the face of zero evidence to show the immense expense and cost to neighbourhoods is net zero when it comes to reducing overdoses and improving outcomes.

      Absolute insanity.

      Like

Leave a comment