LATEST

EDITORIAL – There’s a cheaper, faster, better way to replace the Red Bridge

(Image: Mel Rothenburger)

An editorial by Mel Rothenburger.

THERE’S AN EASY SOLUTION to the Red Bridge problem, if only the provincial government would consider it.

The latest news on building a replacement for the bridge is, basically, almost no news at all. A year after it was destroyed by fire, Premier David Eby says the Province is committed to constructing a new span in its place.

Urban Systems has been awarded a contract to help conduct the planning and design. A list of “preferred options” for design will be ready next spring. Which means a new bridge is at least a couple of years away, probably more. The delay is a bit ridiculous.

As reported here on ArmchairMayor.ca almost exactly a year ago, there’s a quick, economical option that would include a beautiful heritage-style design to modern standards. As I wrote then, it would be stronger, wider and better than the old one.

READ ALSO: ROTHENBURGER – Red Bridge could rise from the ashes, literally – here’s how

A company called Timber Restoration Services could build it using mass timber, an engineered wood construction material that is fire resistant and would last at least as long as steel and concrete.

“We could actually build it to an exact replica, but a refined replica to meet modern highway requirements,” company rep Randy Ludwar told me last year. “Whatever they’re going to build in steel and concrete we can build in wood and mass timber.”

In addition to its several construction advantages, mass timber is up to 25 per cent cheaper than traditional steel and concrete, and faster to build.

There are other companies doing the same kind of construction in B.C. and, of course, a proper bidding process must be followed. Since the provincial government is used to steel and concrete bridge construction, it no doubt needs to be lobbied hard to consider mass timber but it’s not entirely new to them. Officially, the government supports furthering development of the mass timber industry.

So where is that support? Kamloops City council and Tk’emlúps te Secwe̓pemc are supposed to have input into planning for the new bridge but so far they’ve been silent on the mass timber option. Time they got off their backsides and started talking it up.

Mel Rothenburger is a former regular contributor to CFJC-TV and CBC radio, publishes the ArmchairMayor.ca opinion website, and is a recipient of the Jack Webster Foundation Lifetime Achievement Award, and a Webster Foundation Commentator of the Year finalist. He has served as mayor of Kamloops, school board chair and TNRD director, and is a retired daily newspaper editor.  He can be reached at mrothenburger@armchairmayor.ca.

Mel Rothenburger's avatar
About Mel Rothenburger (11572 Articles)
ArmchairMayor.ca is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At ArmchairMayor.ca he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

3 Comments on EDITORIAL – There’s a cheaper, faster, better way to replace the Red Bridge

  1. How can you possibly say it would be a “cheaper, better, faster way” when you have not seen the price, design or timeline for the new bridge? The issue will be the design not the construction.

    Like

    • Mac you are correct but we are looking at a same design (Cement steel vs Timber) not this specific design B.C. data from the 2024 FPInnovations report shows mass timber bridges average 30% shorter timelines than steel, with Urban Systems’ ongoing design phase (due spring 2025) ideally positioned to incorporate it.

      Like

  2. The biggest contributor should be the feds and the most invisible are the feds and our federal MP. They also should be saying more about their involvement in the deathtrap intersection on the Yellowhead at the Residential School and the need for huge improvements. If it goes as usual the homeowners of Kamloops will pay for all of it. These projects are on Band land and should have minimal expense for the City of Kamloops.

    Like

Leave a reply to Mac Cancel reply