LATEST

ARMCHAIR ARCHIVES – Columnists don’t see themselves as others see them

(Image: Pixabay.com)

The following column was first published in The Kamloops News on Friday, March 4, 1977.

SINCE I WROTE last week’s column I have learned that columnists don’t always turn in their copy in time for publication. I won’t mention Bob Saucier’s name because he has sworn never to be late again.

We were discussing columnists and editorial writers and their politics or supposed lack of them. Last week featured Rothenburger, Bob Egby and Jim Harrison. The latter, who vowed he was not politically biased, didn’t give too many clues otherwise in the past week’s editorials. These included a rather weak attempt to criticize Ald. Nelson Riis, and your basic dog control editorial. Not too much to argue with there.

Now for Lindsay Taylor, Doug Collins and John Carter.

You may or may not be aware that there’s another newspaper in town, called the Sentinel. They are in the middle of a switch in managing editors, so it would be second guessing to say what is going to happen to editorial policy once this new fellow (name of Don Bucholtz) gets his feet wet. I would guess, though, that the paper’s traditionally rightwing editorial stance will continue.

Of course, the ME doesn’t have sole editorial power at the Sentinel. The publisher often has a say. I am assured, though, that the Thomson newspaper chain, which owns the Sentinel, does not impose any particular guidelines on its individual papers as to editorial leanings.

The closest thing the Sentinel has had to a political columnist in the last two or three years is Lindsay Taylor, an extremely able reporter. Some would say he’s also slightly insane, but then aren’t we all.

Lindsay has never claimed to be politically impartial. His politics also happen to be contrary to those of his paper. He’s a good friend of such former NDP greats as Dave Barrett and Leo Nimsick. Lindsay, however, was only once a card carrier and that was before he became associated with the media.

Should journalists come out of the closet politically? “I’ll have to say they shouldn’t, though I’d like to say something else.”

Not having seen his column recently, I ask if it’s still running. “I don’t think so.”

Lindsay can be elusive at times. He should go into politics.

CFJC’s news director Doug Collins and his One Man’s Opinion editorials have always seemed to me the result of a moderate thinker, at times conservative and at times liberal. While Egby worries about the latest global conflict, Collins concerns himself with street lights and crosswalks and such.

Doug is a free enterpriser “to the point where I believe government interference is largely harmful,” and “I’m Bill Vander Zalm’s biggest fan.”

On the other hand, “I believe strongly in environmental protection, and particularly farmland preservation.” How does labor see him? “I don’t think they’d brand me as one of their supporters, although I’ve never gone out to deliberately slight them.”

And the chamber? “About the same.”

Doug sees himself as “overall slightly left of centre.”

All his editorials are cleared by management “but I’ve never had them changed.”

What about John Carter, this new fellow from The News who seems to be regarded as pretty sensible? How does he describe his political preferences?

“Indescribable.”

Pressed for more definite response, he responds: “Of course, like every other newsman, I am totally impartial.”

Noting a somewhat insincere tone in his vote, I ask him to get off the pot.

“I have never been a card carrier. I certainly have my sympathies, but it’s certainly not with Social Credit. I have voted NDP in the past, but I hope I’m flexible enough to change.”

Carter concludes: “All this is off the record.”

Indeed.

What do these comments tell you about the city’s editorial writers? That there is a pretty good balance of viewpoints. That they sincerely believe themselves to be stating opinions which are independent of those political viewpoints. And that their audiences undoubtedly see them much differently than they see themselves.

Mel Rothenburger has been writing about Kamloops since 1970. He is a former mayor of Kamloops, former school board chair, retired editor of The Kamloops Daily News, and a former director on the Thompson-Nicola Regional District board. He was awarded the Jack Webster Foundation’s lifetime achievement award in 2011 and was a 2019 Commentator of the Year finalist in the Webster Awards. Contact him at mrothenburger@armchairmayor.ca.

Mel Rothenburger's avatar
About Mel Rothenburger (11572 Articles)
ArmchairMayor.ca is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At ArmchairMayor.ca he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

3 Comments on ARMCHAIR ARCHIVES – Columnists don’t see themselves as others see them

  1. Unknown's avatar John Noakes // March 7, 2025 at 9:16 AM // Reply

    Some of the names are familiar as they went on to be employed by other media outlets.

    Years ago, when I ran for council, the big topic headline was the proposed Ajax mine.  I took a stand against the mine, based on scientific reasoning that more possible harm than good could have resulted in the mine’s proximity to an urban centre.

    I had two interviews; one on radio and the other on TV.  The one on radio was done by a fellow who supported the mine.  Both before and after the interview, he never bothered with a friendly response nor did he shake my hand when I offered the gesture.  The fellow at the TV station was totally the opposite.

    Bias in the media can affect the lives of people who run for office and those who are elected.  I never sought campaign donations because I did not want to be held in the back pocket of a contributor who may seek a favour or two afterwards.

    Thanks for some memories, Armchair Mayor.

    Like

    • Unknown's avatar Mel Rothenburger // March 7, 2025 at 11:58 AM // Reply

      Lindsay Taylor later worked for me at The News — a fine reporter. Not sure where he’s at now. John Carter was an excellent city editor and it was a loss when he moved on, working in the East for a time. He came through town a couple of years ago and a few of us got together for a mini reunion.

      Like

  2. Unknown's avatar Walter Trkla // March 7, 2025 at 8:02 AM // Reply

    The column isn’t wholly unbalanced but it prioritizes the writers’ self-reported views over how their work lands with readers, a kind of Colonel Sanders (CS) analogy of KFC. This column focusses on the “supply side” of journalism (the writers’ intentions CS) and only speculates about the “demand side” (reader perception the chickens) without evidence. This one-sidedness undermines its claim to balance, as it doesn’t wrestle with the full picture of how editorial influence operates. Fair enough, but it should be stated for balance.

    By sidelining the audience’s perspective and staying within the echo chamber of media insiders, it fails to fully grapple with the dynamics it hints at. This is less a balanced view and more a self-referential pat on the back, with the chickens’ (audience) feelings left unexamined. A truly balanced take would’ve dug into how these editorials were received, not just how they were crafted.

    Like

Leave a reply to John Noakes Cancel reply