LATEST

EDITORIAL – Some mayors win their day in court against sanctions

(Image: B.C. Supreme Court)

An editorial by Mel Rothenburger.

SOME MAYORS are doing well in the court system. Mayors other than Reid Hamer-Jackson, that is, who is putting his hopes and his pocket book into pursuing recourse through defamation laws.

The Kamloops mayor’s court cases drag on, and he meanwhile has had no luck in convincing Kamloops councillors to overturn sanctions put on him via code of conduct investigations. Other mayors in similar situations have gone a different route — judicial reviews.

It was announced yesterday (March 5, 2025) that a B.C. Supreme Court judge has quashed sanctions by Quesnel City council against Mayor Ron Paull that were imposed in a unanimous vote almost a year ago over a controversial book.

The book, Grave Error, came into the possession of his wife, who handed out a few copies to others. Paull himself is said to have commented on the book to a couple of other directors at a Cariboo Regional District meeting.

The book challenges the presumption of unmarked graves at residential schools and various issues surrounding it. I wrote about the book and Paull’s situation earlier and won’t go into full detail here but you can check out that particular column if you wish.

Quesnel Mayor Ron Paull. (Image: Screenshot, City of Quesnel)

Paull’s council, worried about relationships with local First Nations, lowered the boom on the mayor with significant sanctions, including removal from the regional board and all committees, and withdrawal of his travel expenses.

Paull sought vindication through a judicial review and he got it. He insisted the report from staff that formed the basis of the sanctions didn’t specify the misconduct he was alleged to have been guilty of, didn’t lay out evidence justifying the censure and sanctions, or explain how the code of conduct was breached.

The council, said Paull, had “denied him a meaningful opportunity to provide a reasoned and structured response.” The judge agreed, ruling that “the censure and sanction of Mayor Paull are quashed on grounds of procedural fairness.”

He also awarded the mayor costs.

I recently commented on another judicial review involving a mayor, this time involving Medicine Hat Mayor Linnsie Clark, who was publicly reprimanded by councillors, had her pay cut in half, was removed as the council’s official spokesperson as well as chair of council meetings, and was banned from communicating with the City manager except by emails that must be copied to councillors.

It was all about some questioning directed by Clark to the City manager regarding an administrative restructure. Mitchell and the manager contended that the mayor had been rude.

Clark pursued a judicial review, and a judge ruled last August that the sanctions had been “disproportionate” and that “no reasonable council” would have imposed them.

It might behoove Kamloops councillors to review the way in which they so readily hand out sanctions against the mayor. Just sayin’.

Mel Rothenburger is a former regular contributor to CFJC-TV and CBC radio, publishes the ArmchairMayor.ca opinion website, and is a recipient of the Jack Webster Foundation Lifetime Achievement Award, and a Webster Foundation Commentator of the Year finalist. He has served as mayor of Kamloops, school board chair and TNRD director, and is a retired daily newspaper editor.  He can be reached at mrothenburger@armchairmayor.ca.

Mel Rothenburger's avatar
About Mel Rothenburger (11765 Articles)
ArmchairMayor.ca is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At ArmchairMayor.ca he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

3 Comments on EDITORIAL – Some mayors win their day in court against sanctions

  1. Sarai admits to the very corruption that mislead the author of the reports that put sanctions on RHJ in the first place….and nothing gets done. Proving corruption on top of corruption.

    Like

  2. Unknown's avatar Earliest Bruce // March 6, 2025 at 7:08 AM // Reply

    The Mayor should consider a similar approach. The defamation issue is separate from the unreasonable sanctions that apply only to the Mayor, whilst Lyin’ Bill remains in his chair with no repercussions for his actions.

    That alone is evidence enough as to the unreasonable element of the sanctions against the Mayor.

    He should also bring copies of the multiple council quotes stating the report had nothing to do with the Lyin’ Bill incident, then show the paragraph in the report that states that incident is one of the reasons for the report.

    Like

  3. Unknown's avatar John Noakes // March 6, 2025 at 7:01 AM // Reply

    RHJ may want to consider a Go Fund Me page to securely raise funds for his legal fees. It’s worth looking into.

    Like

Leave a reply to Earliest Bruce Cancel reply