LATEST

EDITORIAL – Why $150-million police station should go to an AAP

(Image: Mel Rothenburger)

An editorial by Mel Rothenburger.

KAMLOOPS TAXPAYERS are in for another big bill for another big project. City Hall wants to spend $150 million to build a new police station.

Council this week wisely decided not to pull the trigger just yet, sending it instead to a Committee of the Whole session for more discussion. Councillors will have to decide whether or not to direct creation of a new borrowing bylaw, but it goes beyond that — will the project be put to taxpayers via a referendum, or through an Alternative Approval Process?

The latter has a bad name in Kamloops, thanks to last summer’s process in which both a new performing arts centre and a four-sheet ice hockey complex were approved. The AAP was touted by councillors as cheaper and quicker than a referendum — the latter in which voters would decide through an election-style vote.

Opponents of the AAP were, in fact, in court this week, arguing that the AAP should be overturned.

Problems with the AAP were many. Timing was one of them. Shortages in public information were another. But the biggest by far was that the projects in question were nice to haves, not must haves. People should have had an opportunity to say they wanted what was being proposed, or that they didn’t.

The AAP was simply the wrong process, and will taint the projects — at least in the minds of many — forever. But the police station is a different story. It’s a necessity. If we want RCMP to continue doing their job well, we must provide them with the facilities in which to do it.

The current detachment building has become too small. Disappointingly, an initial plan to upgrade it in order to extend its life, then convert it to a City Hall, is off the table. The experts that look at such things have decided the best course of action is to build a whole new building beside the old one, then demolish the old one for parking.

It’s unfortunate that the issue arises so soon after residents, willingly or not, were encumbered with $140 million for a PAC and $135 for a big ice. Resistance to spending another $150 million would, no doubt, be substantial. But a new police station is needed for the safety and security of the community. It’s not an option.

So, when council ultimately decides to go ahead with the project — and it will — it will have to bite the bullet and get the money the AAP way rather than a referendum that would risk defeat.

Mel Rothenburger is a former regular contributor to CFJC-TV and CBC radio, publishes the ArmchairMayor.ca opinion website, and is a recipient of the Jack Webster Foundation Lifetime Achievement Award, and a Webster Foundation Commentator of the Year finalist. He has served as mayor of Kamloops, school board chair and TNRD director, and is a retired daily newspaper editor.  He can be reached at mrothenburger@armchairmayor.ca.

Mel Rothenburger's avatar
About Mel Rothenburger (11572 Articles)
ArmchairMayor.ca is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At ArmchairMayor.ca he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

12 Comments on EDITORIAL – Why $150-million police station should go to an AAP

  1. How willing are we to take the chance the RCMP doesn’t make it happen for us and bill us? This article Mel, makes it seem we have a choice.

    Like

  2. Unknown's avatar Robert George // January 25, 2025 at 5:00 PM // Reply

    Pierre and Mann are on the right track. We need a new provincial police force and a Kamloops and area police force who have responcebility to the people of BC, not to Ottawa. The RCMP should be giving their full attention to the illegal drug business, illegal immigration and gun running to our criminal element,not handing out tickets for no seat belt crossing the street from my place of business to the credit union without doing up one’s seat belt. Leave that to a local cop who might just be a little understanding to a 90 year old. Time for a great deal of change in our present society.More bloody jails and tougher on criminals, many of whom should be doing 25 years,no paroll. A few ,the needle.

    Like

  3. Further to my previous comment I will emphasize that in Canada and in Kamloops the police has never been underfunded. And yet the criminal/unlawful behaviour is constantly on the upswing. Therefore is a pretty easy inference that there is no correlation between spending more money in policing versus better societal outcomes. And repeat, there is good, credible and easily available research corroborating what I have just wrote.

    Like

  4. I have to agree with the general notion put forward by Mel, that an AAP seems far more appropriate for this kind of project.

    But when is the last time you saw a cop enforce speeding or dangerous driving in this town? The police could pay for the new building simply by standing on any major road and writing speeding tickets over a span of two days. From what I understand, traffic enforcement isn’t happening because the officers responsible are on leave, not because there isn’t space for them.

    When is the last time you saw a police officer on a bike, or on foot patrol?

    How is it that one can burn a major bridge down in this city and still the police haven’t made an arrest?

    Maybe make funding contingent on getting us off the #1 spot on the crime severity list, solve the bridge fire and make the streets safer and cleaner. Then we can discuss $150 million. What are we paying for, and where is the return on investment?

    I’m not sure we need more police. We need police to do the basics first. Taxes is this community are quite insane already.

    Like

    • In the winter months police do not like to be out in the cold to do any sort of traffic enforcement. I am regularly out and about on foot and on a bicycle and every time I am out I am either faced with a close call with a motorist or I see a multitude of speeding and distracted driving. And calling in traffic infractions seems to be quite pointless as they refuse to even issue a simple ticket with the excuse that if they, themselves, are not witnessing the infraction then the word of a common person is worthless.

      Like

  5. More “boots on the ground” less “boots at the desk”. Without spending any more money we could have this problem solved. For example, noticed how much needed road patrols are nowhere to be found especially during cold weather?

    Besides, 140 million dollars should be spend on alternative solutions to police problems. Much reliable research is readily available supporting the above premise.

    Like

  6. So a referendum would “risk defeat” but an AAP wouldn’t? This tells us all we need to know about the choice to use an AAP–it stacks the deck.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Thanks, Bronwen. Perhaps we can hope this editorial and your observation are read by others who have a particular interest with the AAP.

      Like

  7. The need for a new RCMP HQ is not a surprise.  The present detachment (building) has been overcrowded for several years.

    A quick addition of the figures puts the borrowing figure at $425,000,000 or just shy of half a billion dollars for the PAC, the arena complex and the RCMP detachment.

    Some of us, which may come as a surprise to Councillor Neustaeter, did not have our heads in the sand, the weeds.

    Put the AAP approval of the other two projects in abeyance, let the crowd at the Horse Shoe clear their heads of the sand and weeds, and tend to the important business of dealing with the RCMP Headquarters first.  That’s if they can stop the pattern of bullying which they’ve held as their priority for the last two years.

    Liked by 1 person

    • The interest on half a billion dollars is more than half a billion dollars. Is a billion-dollar debt for a city with about 40,000 taxpayers actually tenable?

      Like

      • Unknown's avatar John Noakes // January 17, 2025 at 8:23 PM //

        Absolutely not. Where are the checks and balances? Certainly none of the ones at City Hall have any sense of reality, Bronwen.

        Like

    • And as my mother used to say, 2 wrongs (or, in this case, 3) don’t make a right. Mr. Noakes is right. Postpone the vanity projects. Deal with the necessities then see what you can afford.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to jdnirwin Cancel reply