LATEST

FORSETH – Independent investigation into election questions needed

John Rustad.

SINCE LATE THURSDAY morning (01/09), much has been said about issues Conservative Party of BC leader John Rustad raised about possible irregularities in last Fall’s provincial election – and in particular, in the riding of Surrey-Guilford.

I shared the story online, and one of the most concerning comments I received was a simple one-word response, “Snore.

Maybe you’ll agree it’s snore worthy (I hope not), however, how would individuals — partisan to another political party — feel if the shoe was on the other foot?

Irregularities in any riding, including those that benefit one candidate over another, should concern us. Our democracy is based on trust, and in this instance, that trust seems to be in question.

I know post-election BC Conservative leader John Rustad indicated the party would take time to review possible election irregularities, and now, two and a half months later, issues have been brought forward that, at least to me, are indeed questionable.

It is alleged that votes were cast by 22 people that did not even reside in the riding, as well as individuals casting more than one vote, and even people going to vote and being told someone had already cast a ballot using their name.

In reading and listening to multiple news reports yesterday, one thing really popped for me, that was the 21 mail-in ballots from Argyll Lodge.

A CBC News story quotes Fraser Health as stating, “the home consists of 25 beds” and “provides therapeutic programs and activities focused on maintaining and promoting mental, physical, emotional, and social health for adults.”

In that same story, owner and manager Baljit Kandola called it, “a mental health and addictions facility.”

That’s fine so far but did either of those two numbers trigger anything for you, because they certainly did for me?

According the Elections BC, just over 2.1 million people participated in the 2024 provincial election – a voter turnout that they estimated to be 58.3 percent.

So, province wide, 58.3 percent of British Columbians cast a ballot in the 2024 BC provincial election. And yet, we are expected to believe that, of their own free-will, eighty-four percent of the residents at Argyll Lodge chose to cast a ballot?

That’s a voter turn-out 44 percent higher than the province-wide average!  Something smells fishy for me.

Considering that, and other issues raised yesterday, I believe there should indeed be a thorough investigation of the situation in Surrey-Guilford.  And that investigation should be independent of the province, and any provincial authority, including Elections BC.

At every level, we should have confidence that our electoral processes are fair, honest, and democratic – and that the individuals we elect truly represent the wishes of voters.

As one person stated to me, “Anyone who will cheat, or intentionally manipulate an election, does not have our best interests at heart.”

That is certainly something, no mater what our politics, we should all be able to agree on.

Agree or not, let’s hear from you.  Let me know in the “Comments” what you think.

Alan Forseth is a Kamloops resident. For 40 years he has been active, in a number of capacities, in local, provincial and federal politics, including running as a candidate for the BC Reform Party in the 1996 provincial election. He is a member of the BC Conservative Party and was the campaign manager for the party in the Kamloops-North Thompson riding in this year’s provincial election.

Mel Rothenburger's avatar
About Mel Rothenburger (11572 Articles)
ArmchairMayor.ca is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At ArmchairMayor.ca he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

5 Comments on FORSETH – Independent investigation into election questions needed

  1. Unknown's avatar Beverly Hewlett // January 12, 2025 at 10:47 AM // Reply

    All so true Mel. I have often wondered about the “voting twice” factor. When you go in to vote they ask you to swear that you have NOT voted anywhere else, or by any other means. When you reply “no” do they just take you at your word? In this day of advanced technology you would think “they” could come up with a better system. Maybe a voters card (password protected) that you are issued if you pass ALL the qualifications, and that would somehow signal in the system that you are ligit and have not already voted.??

    Like

  2. Unknown's avatar Walter Trkla // January 11, 2025 at 8:18 AM // Reply

    David, you accuse Rustad of ‘trumpisam”. You trot out the Maduro canard, which in itself is “trumpist”.

    Due to economic warfare against Canada by the USA, I think, these days, many Canadians, particularly Trudeau, feel like Maduro minus the $25 million bounty on his head. 

    Venezuela uses an electronic voting system. Voters cast their ballots on electronic machines that print a paper receipt for verification. This receipt is then deposited into a ballot box, providing a physical backup for auditing purposes. Votes are counted automatically by the machines, which then transmit results to a central system. There are mechanisms for manual audits and recounts. Who funds election in Venezuela, same interests that fund ours. 

     President Center and his Center has praised Venezuela’s automated voting system, particularly highlighting the use of electronic voting machines with thumbprint recognition in 2012, when Jimmy Carter called it “the best in the world” for its verification capabilities

    The largest oil reserves in the world are in Venezuela which Chavez and Maduro nationalized and increased royalties from 1% to 30% (Alaska 34%, Norway 75%, Alberta 1-4%) to fund its social programs. This ushered in years of sanctions, assassination attempts, protests, and theft of oil refineries as well as interference in its elections. Oil revenue lifted 49% of Venezuelans out of poverty, implemented reforms in education and healthcare.

    The reality, your use of Maduro as an example of election fraud, which very well could be, even though observers (Pes Carter) have said otherwise is that this is another example of Canada and the US pushing for regime change, not because of a humanitarian situation but as a means of opening the country up to pillage by “our” and US oil corporations

    Like

  3. He is not Premier and I am already sick of him

    Like

  4. Unknown's avatar cheerfullymystic // January 10, 2025 at 6:15 PM // Reply

    Is it really that hard to believe that people with additions getting help would have strong opinions supporting an NDP government who is more supportive of giving help to addicts than the Conservatives who basically wants to treat them again as criminals?

    Like

  5. “At every level, we should have confidence that our electoral processes are fair, honest, and democratic – and that the individuals we elect truly represent the wishes of voters.”

    Absolutely.

    Should these allegations be investigated? Of course, with all expediencies. Thats how we ensure our democratic system. If we dont we are no better than Venezuela’s Meduro.

    Do I think theres any merit to any of these allegations? Absolutely not.

    Grasping at MAGA straws is the most polite way to put it, and Rustad has already shown repeatedly that he plays the full trump playbook, so Im not surprised hes trying this.

    I even expect him to not accept the results after the investigation, to keep the ball rolling.

    All we need to top this off … is a pornstar.

    Like

Leave a reply to David Cancel reply