CHARBONNEAU – If Rustad cuts B.C.’s carbon tax, we will still have one

John Rustad during leaders’ debate.
JOHN RUSTAD, the leader of the British Columbia Conservative Party, will scrap B.C.’s carbon tax if he becomes premier.
Good luck with that.
Saskatchewan, Ontario, and Alberta tried to do it only to have the feds impose one. The provinces took the issue to court but lost. The Supreme Court of Canada upheld the constitutionality of the federal government’s carbon pricing system, ruling that climate change is a matter of national concern.
B.C. Premier Eby mentioned the federal carbon pricing system, in the televised leaders debate on Oct. 8, when he referred to the “federal backstop.” Why he didn’t elaborate and dismiss Rustad’s plan to cut the carbon tax, I’m not sure.
Probably it was because Eby himself has said he would cut the carbon tax as well if the feds do.
That’s a big “if.” If the federal Conservatives win the next election, and if they (heaven forbid) cut the carbon tax, then provinces will no longer have to do anything about the climate emergency.
For now, this federal government has the authority to impose a federal carbon tax under the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act in cases where provinces don’t.
Too bad Eby didn’t elaborate. The “federal backstop” ensures that every province and territory has a carbon pricing mechanism in place to meet national emissions reduction goals.
After Saskatchewan, Ontario, and Alberta politicized climate change, Rustad hopes to join the deniers club. B.C. could be the next province to be seen as a laggard in fighting climate change.
The BC Liberals implemented the first carbon tax in North America in 2008, a move lauded internationally as an effective method of fighting climate change.
It’s sad to see former BC Liberal MLAs abandon their principles – MLAs like former BC Liberal MLA Peter Milobar — now Conservative candidate for Kamloops Centre.
Unfortunately, confusion abounds in the minds of many B.C. voters.
Popularity of the Conservative Party B.C. is a consequence of branding. Voters confuse them with the federal Conservative Party which is riding high in the polls nationally.
Then, some British Columbians still think that the carbon levy is a “carbon tax” even though taxes are monies collected to finance public works and services, such as roads and schools and programs such as Old Age Security and Health Care.
The carbon levy is returned to consumers. Most Canadians receive a rebate greater than what they pay in added costs of fossil fuels.
Worse, in a recent poll conducted by Research Co., one in four British Columbians think that global warming is mostly caused by natural changes.
Another 13 per cent of British Columbians think global warming has not been proven. That’s an astonishing total of over one third of British Columbians who are in denial of the human caused climate emergency.
In fact, without human influence we would currently be in a very slow cooling trend that began around 6,000 years ago, moving towards another glacial period according to a study published in the prestigious magazine Nature.
Yet, in a fit of common sense, 75 per cent of British Columbians agree that we need to do much more, or a bit more, to deal with climate change according to the survey.
David Charbonneau is a retired TRU electronics instructor who hosts a blog at http://www.eyeviewkamloops.wordpress.com.
The carbon tax costs the average family up to $399 more this year than the rebates they get back, according to the PBO.
By 2030, that cost jumps to $903.
Those are annual costs, so those numbers downplay the total cost over time.
By the end of 2030, the carbon tax will have cost that average household a whopping $4,388, even after the rebates.
LikeLike
Bill, let me ask, what do you think would happen if the Liberals and the NDP merged setting up one centre-left coalition party, temporary or otherwise? Research Co. a Vancouver research organization did a national poll last October which showed a 42-36-8-8-2 conservative, lib/ndp, BQ, Green, Ppls Party split with either Trudeau or Singh leading the coalition. But what if a new person, uncluttered by the stench of Ottawa were to emerge as a new leader, someone like former governor of both the Bank of Canada and Bank of England Mark Carney, do you think this could influence a move to a more balanced split between the conservatives and the new lib/ndp coalition? And considering the Bloc is a left leaning political party if they held the balance of power do you think they’d be more inclined to support the right wing conservatives or the left leaning coalition? Oh, and of course let’s not forget about the Greens.
Obviously this is just hypothetical, it’s not like it’s desperate times when desperate measures are needed to be taken and when have we ever seen a political party surrender to another to stop an opposing party, that never happens. Just a little food for thought.
LikeLike
I have to bring attention to yet another use of selective facts in the articles of Mr. Charbonneau to further a position that is ultimately untrue. In this case, the claim that carbon tax is good, because it addresses climate change and Canadians receive more in rebates than the tax they pay – a win win for everyone!
“The carbon levy is returned to consumers. Most Canadians receive a rebate greater than what they pay in added costs of fossil fuel”.
That statement is accurate. However, Mr. Charbonneau left out the important bits as they relate to overall outcomes.
“Examining the economic impact of the carbon tax, which analysis found slightly reduces Canada’s overall GDP and adds other costs to the economy. In that case, taking in both the direct and indirect cost of the carbon tax, most households are worse off”.
“When we use the government’s own numbers and isolate the fuel charge itself, we still find that the average household is worse off, including the economic impact”.
On average, an Ontario family comes out $903 worse per year.
That is from the Big Budget Officer, by the way.
I continue to be unimpressed by the lack of journalistic rigour in these particular articles, and encourage the writer to present the entirely of the relevant facts. It shouldn’t fall to the peanut gallery to point these shortcomings out.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is undeniable that human activities are affecting more than the climate. It is also undeniable that most Canadians, truth be told, could care less.
LikeLike
I would recommend anyone over 60 concerned about climate change donate a lifetime equivalent to the taxes they should be paying as the generation responsible for it . Should be immediate too. Otherwise we end up with the generations which caused the problem only paying for it for a small portion of their lives while the next generations pay for it their whole lives.
LikeLike
Maybe David has missed the news cycle of 2024, but the Liberal government is set for a historic shellacking, and so with them, the ill considered, and I’ll managed carbon tax.
When the party goes, their bad ideas go with them.
I’d also remind David that our high taxes already pay for public works. We don’t need more taxes to do that. Let’s use our already high taxes to pay for basic services and deliver them properly. We pay the highest costs for health care per capita, and receive some of the worst care in the developed world.
Paper straws are the son of the devil, and I for one look forward to some sensible policy and a return to the silky smooth feeling that a plastic straw provides.
LikeLike