LATEST

ALTERNATIVE APPROVAL – ‘No’ effort falls short, PAC, iceplex get green light

Crowd hears announcement in front of City Hall. (Image: Mel Rothenburger)

To the sound of cheers and passing trains, the announcement was made today (Sept. 23, 2024) on the front steps of City Hall — the City will build a new performing arts centre and four-sheet iceplex.

‘No’ side response forms didn’t reach the 10-per cent threshold of electors for either project, meaning the City can go ahead with borrowing $140 million for the PAC and $125 million for the sports facility. The iceplex borrowing bylaw also includes $10 million for development and design of other projects.

Under the AAP or alternative approval process, those opposed to either project had to return ‘No’ response forms to the City by the end of day last Friday. Those who didn’t return forms were assumed to vote ‘Yes.’ In order to force a referendum, 10 per cent of eligible voters or 8,713 of them, would have had to choose ‘No.’

The bylaw for the PAC attracted 6,363 ‘No’ votes, of which 561 were rejected for a valid total of 5,802, equivalent to 6.66 per cent of the threshold.

For the arena multiplex, 366 response forms were rejected out of 4,391 received, leaving 4,025 valid or 4.62 per cent.

“Over the last 45 days we have seen democracy at work,” Build Kamloops committee chair Mike O’Reilly told the crowd of about 150 people. “This AAP was democracy in action.”

He said the council had consciously chosen not to actively participate in the assent process. “We committed collectively to not chiming in and being part of the process.”

Construction on the Seymour Street PAC will begin in 2025 and on the sports facility in 2026, he said, and public fundraising will begin.

The AAP had created controversy apart from whether electors wanted the facilities. Some believed it was undemocratic and that the projects should have been put to referenda in which voters would mark ballots ‘Yes’ or ‘No.’ Several small groups organized the collection of response forms.

While the iceplex is a new project, the PAC has been on the City’s books since 2003 when it was included in a cultural plan. It was defeated in a 2015 referendum, and a later referendum was shelved due to COVID.

“This is such a positive step forward for Kamloops and now we can come together as a community and raise the funds to support these exciting projects,” said Brenda Aynsley, chair of the Kamloops Centre for the Arts Society.

Henry Pejril, president of the Kamloops Sports Council, was also excited about the outcome. “Now that we have certainty in our direction, we can get our Build Kamloops capital campaign up and firing on all cylinders.”

Mel Rothenburger's avatar
About Mel Rothenburger (11607 Articles)
ArmchairMayor.ca is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At ArmchairMayor.ca he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

6 Comments on ALTERNATIVE APPROVAL – ‘No’ effort falls short, PAC, iceplex get green light

  1. The numbers are interesting:

    1) Non valid votes (probably due to the postal code controversy) as counted, played no roll in the final count. Neither of those would have pipped the no numbers, above the threshold.

    2) The PAC attracted 5,802 valid no votes.

    3) The arena multiplex received 4,025 valid no votes.

    An inaccurate way of looking at it is that 1,777 valid votes were only against the PAC, as apposed to equal voting against both.

    Inaccurate as this does not include those who voted only against the ice rink, and that demographic does exist. Its fair to lower the 1,777 difference by a % to include this group. Either way, its balanced to say that more voted against just the PAC … than against just the ice rink.

    A way to look at that is to say:

    – that the fringe PAC “We already voted against this once” group came out,

    – and the “even though its proven that the Sagebrush is used 250 nights per year, so the operations of a PAC will pay for itself, I still think no one needs it” crowd also spoke out,

    – and the bunch who only see hockey worthy of public funds came out, showing possibly an anti-PAC support drive by the hockey association bunch in an attempt to keep the total borrowed dollars down by about half?

    At the end of the day, even though the no side was very evident at public events everywhere with forms at their table this summer (Canada Day, Rib Fest, Farmers Market and many other community events worth setting it up, etc. etc. etc.) … and this table was seen by many 10’s of thousands, they just didnt attract signatures. Not even 10%.

    That says a lot.

    Still, I wont disagree that this AAP was misused, and was inappropriate for this. Both questions could have been easily tagged alongside the Provincial election as a referendum.

    This may end up biting supporting Council members, all on its own,
    come next municipal election.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Seriously talking about “democracy” when everything they have done was to silence or neutralize critics? The guy in the cheap suit is truly an affront to democracy.

    Liked by 2 people

  3. The AAP succeeded in what it was designed to do – require a herculean effort to stop a motion that council wants to see approved.

    Any council person, Mike “Democracy in Action” O’Reilly included, that thinks reverse onus comes anywhere near democracy in action is a fool, or great at playing politician.

    I would imagine the tune from council would be far different if AAP were used to determine if they should keep their jobs, with the passive “No” vote as presumed, and each having to source 9000 valid “Yes” submissions to keep their jobs.

    So let’s celebrate. Hats off to the great work of the opposition groups to rally and produce a respectable count of opposition votes during summer and back to school season. That was no easy task.

    And to the proponents – let’s all start saving those tax dollars. Another outrageous increase is not far behind.

    🎉🎆🎊🍾

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Thank God for that. Finally, some progress. Good for you citizens of Kamloops, and cue the whiners screaming “fix” or unfair etc.

    Like

  5. The folks in Kamloops are not quite ready for a state of the art concert hall. They have little reverence for etiquette.
    So what’s a state of are concert hall for if a concert-goer gets continuously disturbed by drinking, whispering, coughing, sneezing and more?

    Like

  6. Unknown's avatar rodtotten3ad77cdb14 // September 23, 2024 at 2:29 PM // Reply

    Well what do you expect when this council would not take any questions during council meetings and shut down the NO vote very effectively, so we get this pushed down our throats and I just wonder how much these big businesses are going to help out the people of Kamloops, myself I think Zilch, Zero, Nothing as they are going to cry we don’t have the money but are able to pay huge bonuses to upper management.

    This council had to do it this way as they knew if it went to a referendum they would loose again.

    Like

Leave a reply to Renee Cancel reply