LATEST

EDITORIAL – Federal NDP leader was right to confront the name callers

Jagmeet Singh confronts a man after hearing someone shout “corrupted bastard” at him. (Image: Screenshot)

An editorial by Mel Rothenburger.

JAGMEET SINGH went up a notch in my books this week. Singh doesn’t shy away from confronting hecklers if he thinks they’re out of line but what he did a few days ago showed all over again he’s a man willing to stand up for himself.

As he was walking outside Parliament Hill he was tailed by a couple or guys. Someone shouted “corrupted bastard” at him. Singh spun around, walked back to where them and demanded to know who had said it. Nobody would fess up and it wasn’t confirmed who had made the remark..

Singh was right to call the culprit whoever it was, a coward. Reaction to the incident has been varied, from criticism to support. He deserves the latter; there’s no reason the leader of a federal political party should have to put up with that sort of crap.

If the same insult had been directed at a female MP, there would have been outrage, and correctly so. It shouldn’t be any different for a man.

As Singh confronted the men who seemed to be involved, a couple of Parliamentary security officers stood nearby and did nothing. Maybe they were just waiting to see if anything untoward developed but as soon as the insult was launched they should have been on top of it, escorting those responsible out of the vicinity.

The fact the security guys didn’t move, that they just stood watching, has been criticized by some of Singh’s NDP members and they make a good point. It’s sad that politicians now require protection but that’s the way things are these days, and clearly the leaders of our political parties have to be better protected.

There was a time when anyone could walk into our Parliament Buildings without restriction or even be checked at the entrance. Those days are gone. A fresh look at security around Parliament Hill, as well as at how politicians, especially party leaders, are kept from harm’s way, is needed.

A lot of people who were called “corrupt bastard” would have just kept walking, and that would have emboldened the slug responsible. I’m glad Singh didn’t ignore it, and instead turned to face it head on. Maybe it will result in something being done.

Mel Rothenburger is a former regular contributor to CFJC-TV and CBC radio, publishes the ArmchairMayor.ca opinion website, and is a recipient of the Jack Webster Foundation Lifetime Achievement Award, and a Webster Foundation Commentator of the Year finalist. He has served as mayor of Kamloops, school board chair and TNRD director, and is a retired daily newspaper editor.  He can be reached at mrothenburger@armchairmayor.ca.

Mel Rothenburger's avatar
About Mel Rothenburger (11572 Articles)
ArmchairMayor.ca is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At ArmchairMayor.ca he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

3 Comments on EDITORIAL – Federal NDP leader was right to confront the name callers

  1. The more people stand up to these spineless morons the quicker they’ll crawl back under their rocks.

    Like

  2. Pretty clear the guy in the video … black tshirt / red letters … was the guy who said it, just listen to the commentors voice and the conversation. Singh also figured this out instantly and had the pleasure of calling him a coward while having close eye contact.

    It is sad that he is accustomed to dealing with hecklers of the past due to his religious convictions to begin with, but cool that he is emboldened to not walk away from it.

    Respect goes up a notch, but still pretty sure I dont want his party in government, and he would be ok with that. I do agree that party leaders need better security, when in a public space, no one should be near him without a security check, nobody. Should be treated just like American leaders are. Those officers should have stepped forward to be within arms reach of this guy in case he did something.

    Like

  3. Doesn’t that member of the public have a right to expression? There are no laws against crass or rude delivery of expression. There is no right to not be offended in this country.

    And thank goodness, because such an arbitrary criteria would pit us in a country where individuals make laws based on moral perspective rather than the great things that give us our freedoms. This is why Larry Flint won his court battle instead of the moral busybodies thinking they have the authority to save us from ourselves.

    No one said freedom was free. There are difficulties and situations of discomfort to deal with. But these are small prices to pay for the alternative, where one could be sent to prison for confronting a political leader in this way.

    Singh did in fact use his political position to promote a private company’s product on social media. Singh quickly deleted the post after it was pointed out. Perhaps that is what the member of the public was referring to by his comment. Last week, Singh seemed to challenge Pierre to a fight in the House. All are behaviours unbecoming of a parliamentarian.

    The individual who said that should have walked up to Mr. Singh and said yes, I said that, and I believe it to be true. It indeed was cowardly to not stand by those words, and a missed opportunity to show the country that freedom of expression is for all of us, regardless if a party leader dislikes it.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to Al Cancel reply