LATEST

EDITORIAL – Why do we need pit bulls?

(Image: Mel Rothenburger)

An editorial by Mel Rothenburger.

PIT BULL DEFENDERS will, I’m sure, be ready with their usual responses after the weekend report of yet another attack by pit bulls in Kamloops.

“Ban the deed, not the breed.”

“It’s the owner, not the dog.”

“All breeds can be dangerous depending on the situation.”

“Our beloved Daisy May (or whatever) has never done anything like this before. She’s our fur baby.”

And so on. So let’s consider what we know so far. According to news reports, a border collie was in its own fenced yard on Richmond Avenue early Sunday morning when three pit bulls jumped the fence and attacked it, then fled.

The collie is dead; the pit bulls were caught by Community Service Officers. An investigation will attempt to confirm exactly what happened. If the circumstances are as described, a decision will be made on the fate of the pit bulls. Destruction is an option.

And the debate about pit bulls will continue with no effective resolution. There will even be differences of opinion about whether pit bulls are actually a breed; therefore, how can you prove they were pit bulls, they’ll say.

Border collies, poodles, Golden retrievers and many other breeds have attacked other dogs and humans, too, they’ll say.

And yet, pit bull attacks are too common, and too devastating in their consequences. Unprovoked, they’ve killed other dogs. Unprovoked, they’ve killed humans or maimed them for life — Kamloops has its own examples of such tragedies over a period of many years.

Pit bull ownership should be banned. Legislators have shied away from taking that step in the Tournament Capital but other cities aren’t so reluctant. They’ve either banned them, restricted them or defined them as vicious. Several communities in Alberta have banned them altogether. More than a dozen Saskatchewan communities have banned them, two dozen in Manitoba, three in New Brunswick. Ontario has banned them provincewide.

Elsewhere, a few countries have banned pit bulls nationwide.

Could so many jurisdictions be over-reacting? Pit bulls were originally bred to fight and to kill in cruel blood sports. They’re incredibly strong; they’re known for their unusual aggression when they do attack and for being especially hard to stop once they do.

B.C. has been lax in dealing with the problem. Those communities that have breed-specific regulations in this province limit them to such things as muzzling pit bulls when they’re in public or keeping them securely confined on the owners’ property.

Clearly, that doesn’t help when pit bulls escape and go on a rampage. They are the cause of too many tragedies, so why do we need them?

The answer is, we don’t.

Mel Rothenburger is a former regular contributor to CFJC-TV and CBC radio, publishes the ArmchairMayor.ca opinion website, and is a recipient of the Jack Webster Foundation Lifetime Achievement Award, and a Webster Foundation Commentator of the Year finalist. He has served as mayor of Kamloops, school board chair and TNRD director, and is a retired daily newspaper editor.  He can be reached at mrothenburger@armchairmayor.ca.

Mel Rothenburger's avatar
About Mel Rothenburger (11886 Articles)
ArmchairMayor.ca is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At ArmchairMayor.ca he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

8 Comments on EDITORIAL – Why do we need pit bulls?

  1. Unknown's avatar Ann Marie Rogers // September 15, 2024 at 12:21 PM // Reply

    I agree with you 100%!
    pit bulls are the #1 canine killer of people, pets and livestock every year.

    #SaveLivesBanPitbulls

    Like

  2. Unknown's avatar Donna Christensen // September 10, 2024 at 9:59 AM // Reply

    It is the Owners !!! Not the dog. I have dog sat many different dog breeds. I am least afraid of large dogs. I do not trust little dogs, turn your back and they will go after your ankle. I have experienced this type of thing with more smaller breeds than the large breeds. Small breeds just leave smaller bite marks so some people do not think they are dangerous. Smaller dog breeds also bark at everything and seems more difficult to make them stop. I find it so brutal that Pitbulls and other large dogs get such a bad rap. It is the owners! They should have to prove themselves before they can have a large breed or Pitbull.

    Like

    • Have similar arguments been made about ,say, gun control? “It wasn’t the AK-47 that was responsible for killing all those people, it was the person holding the gun and squeezing the trigger!”

      First, eliminate the AK-47 then deal with the person who might hold a weapon capable of killing numerous people in a short time period.

      Like

    • That is like saying the owners of the great white shark are responsible for raising the shark in a manner that caused it to bite someone’s leg off at the beach, or that they let it escape the cage and it swam off and ate a sailor.

      Like

  3. Pit Bulls are dangerous. Why doesn’t the city take up a bylaw banning such vicious and dangerous animals in city limits?

    It’s as if you need a bevy of weapons to protect yourselves from random attacks by drug addicts, home invasions, and wild Pit Bulls roaming the streets looking for the next dog or child to shred apart.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Recently, a small dog was disembowelled by a “pit bull” in a park in the Lower Mainland. The fatal attack was recorded with video and audio.

    On the weekend, here in Kamloops, a Collie in its own yard was attacked and mauled to death by three “pit bull dogs” that allegedly had gained access to the yard and then escaped after they had killed their victim.

    For these two separate events, it’s hard to make much of an argument supporting having dogs that can launch brutal and often fatal attacks on other dogs especially and also on people.

    Insurance companies (love them or hate them) may take away some of the emotion from this issue by denying home insurance or tenants package policies to the owner(s) of a “pit bull”.  Those companies go by statistics. Don’t think that brokers won’t be keeping tabs on these latest attacks.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Only sinister people own dangerous dogs, including pit bulls. City’s administrators with resolve would advise a bylaw to ban such dogs with urgency.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. dog lover here and I agree with you. Many years ago my sister had the dearest, sweetest pit bull, I had no issues with her being around my dogs, children etc. she didn’t have a vicious bone in her body until she did.. unprovoked she attacked another persons leashed dog. The results were not pretty. The breed should be banned

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment

Why are you reporting this comment?

Report type