LATEST

EDITORIAL – Here’s what the Olympics and the PAC have in common

(Image: Pixabay.com)

An editorial by Mel Rothenburger.

THE PARIS OLYMPICS concluded Sunday with a spectacular closing ceremony that included a light show, plenty of music and Tom Cruise doing one of his patented stunts. But it was the obvious joy on the part of the athletes that stood out — including Canada’s swimming sensation Summer McIntosh and hammer thrower Ethan Katzberg, well known to Kamloops since he trains here at the Tournament Capital Centre.

By all accounts, despite a few hiccups, the 2024 Paris version of the Olympics was an outstanding success, providing two weeks of entertainment, cultural experiences and amazing athletic performances.

Canadian athletes did especially well (despite the soccer scandal), bringing home a record 27 medals.

Nevertheless, questions will be raised about whether it was worth the $8.2-billion cost. It was ever thus. Social media warriors and media commentators alike will say the money would have been better spent on healthcare, water systems and housing for the homeless.

The first answer to that is that the Olympics, for all their cost over-runs, scandals and irritants, present a solid business case. Common wisdom is that, for every dollar spent, three dollars are generated for local and international economies.

But it’s much more than that. The old saying, “All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy” (or, perhaps, “makes Jack and Jacqueline boring people”), is very much at play here. Certainly, we have problems that take up massive amounts of money and always will. No matter how much we spend on social issues, it can never be enough to solve them.

In the meantime, we have to keep ourselves healthy mentally and physically. Imagine what kind of a world it would be without music, theatre, the movies, television, dancing or “the Big Game.” We must laugh and we must cheer, or life wouldn’t be worth living.

This applies to the local level as much as it does to global events: as much to the drive for a new performing arts centre and more ice sheets as it does to what we just had the enjoyment of watching in France.

We must be able to take time from our work, our social problems, our personal stresses, to allow ourselves to be entertained.

A good business case is essential for the new PAC, of course, and there are many economic spinoffs for tourism and the hospitality sector, as well as the arts community. But the really important benefit is what these facilities bring to us as citizens.

Build Kamloops represents an investment in lifestyle and community well-being. What a dull place Kamloops would be without feel-good bricks and mortar.

Mel Rothenburger is a former regular contributor to CFJC-TV and CBC radio, publishes the ArmchairMayor.ca opinion website, and is a recipient of the Jack Webster Foundation Lifetime Achievement Award, and a Webster Foundation Commentator of the Year finalist. He has served as mayor of Kamloops, school board chair and TNRD director, and is a retired daily newspaper editor.  He can be reached at mrothenburger@armchairmayor.ca.

Mel Rothenburger's avatar
About Mel Rothenburger (11675 Articles)
ArmchairMayor.ca is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At ArmchairMayor.ca he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

7 Comments on EDITORIAL – Here’s what the Olympics and the PAC have in common

  1. In the Olympics, the sports paid for the Arts and the sports are the reason the arts were showcased. It should be no different in kamloops – build the sports and rec facilities with the loans and those will generate the cash to pay for the Arts facilities which based on the realities of Kamloops crowds will never ever pay for themselves.

    otherwise, the Arts are the responsibilities of wealthy patrons. This is the business case for all of human development in those areas and the best way to develop talent in both areas as well.

    Like

  2. There is no business case. The PAC has an inherent and fundamental flaw – it’s in Kamloops.

    If the PAC is built, at tremendous cost to the taxpayer, Kamloops will have a PAC, but it will still be in dull and crime-infested Kamloops. As stated before, Kamloops leadership (a term used very loosely) should focus on the basics first. Look at the state of trash strewn about at homeless encampments on all sides of the rivers. Look at the wasteland that is the downtown core. Who would want to come and park their vehicles here? I don’t recall any film crews this year. They used to park next to Mustard Seed. Did they (unsurprisingly) have enough of that?

    A much stronger argument could have been made for the PAC when costs were $40 million and we didn’t have more addiction services than hotels in this town. But Kamloops was always a small-minded town, interested in big trucks and watching men skate about chasing a puck with sticks than anything to do with the arts. That small mindedness caused delays in getting these projects stood up. And now we all pay the price.

    Mac points out that a touring show, if they even stop here, will also stop in Kelowna. If anyone has a choice between here and there, they will choose Kelowna. Armstrong and Chase tourists aren’t going to bring Kamloops the purported spin offs, because the PAC is still in Kamloops.

    A more sensible approach would be to delay the loan on the PAC until interest rates drop in a few years, and in the meanwhile focus on making this city a little less of a national embarrassment.

    Like

    • You are presenting a very sensible argument albeit an unpopular one. It is still Kamloops after all indeed. A place where there is not even one single one star restaurant for example.

      Like

  3. Maybe at one time the argument for the untold benefits of spin-offs was a valid one. But I think at the present moment, in lieu of the comprehensive state of the world, we need to re-think the way we live. We need the games as much as we need wars?

    Like

    • Unknown's avatar Walter Trkla // August 13, 2024 at 11:17 PM // Reply

      I found them very useful in school as I mentioned in my post above. “Bread and circuses“: (panem et circenses) was used by the Romans to appease the plebians. In politics today its called smoke and mirror. The Ukraine attack on Kursk could be Zelensky wants to divert attention from the losses while Putin may have allowed it to justify  total war.   In a political context, the phrase means to generate public approval for an unpopular idea or to hide domestic problems by blaming an enemy. I see it as a way to bamboozle the bamboozled

      Like

  4. What’s the business case for this PAC, where is it, why does it not exist? Four years ago the $70million PAC had one (page 6) https://kamloopscentreforthearts.ca/wp-content/themes/kca/pdf/kca-business-case.pdf. Three years ago Kelowna’s $70million PAC had one (page 2) https://www.kelowna.ca/sites/files/1/kelowna_pac_feasibility_study_-_report_final.pdf

    Tourism spinoffs, really, what tourism spinoffs? Funny, I haven’t heard a peep from the hotel association, could it be because they realize a PAC will have next to zero impact on hotel stays. Someone, anyone, please explain who will come to Kamloops to watch a show rather than going to Kelowna or the coast. Oh, I know, it must be the hordes coming from Ashcroft, Barriere and Chase, otherwise known as the ABC’s of tourism Kamloops. We don’t need a Ferrari when a Civic will do the job.

    Liked by 2 people

  5. Kamloops has the 2nd highest municipal taxes in BC. That’s before the PAC costs are downloaded onto taxpayers. It also has the highest crime severity rate in the country. Read that again and take a look around at the state of our roads, trails, bylaw and municipal services, facilities and all the rest of it.

    These are significant markers for leadership failure and municipal mismanagement. A PAC should be reserved for well functioning municipalities only, not arrogant perpetual back-patters that avoid acknowledging reality whilst listening to the back slapping sounds in their council echo chambers.

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a reply to Mac Gordon Cancel reply