LATEST

ROTHENBURGER – What the mayor’s news conference was really all about

NICELY PLAYED. Not only did he not resign, but Mayor Reid Hamer-Jackson says he’ll run in the next mayoral election.

Some media have their shirts in a knot because Hamer-Jackson texted them last week with an invitation to a press conference at the Columbia Street lookout about “resignation consideration.” He somehow didn’t quite live up to their expectations of what was going to be said today. One reporter called it “bait and switch.” Another said it was “pretense.” Another, “a stunt.”

Well, it’s true he didn’t resign and has never seriously considered it, but if they’d thought carefully about the “consideration” word they wouldn’t have been so surprised or offended. And he did address the resignation issue with his vow to remain in office and run again.

“Whether to resign isn’t a decision I take lightly,” he said.

“I thought long and hard about my past 22 months as the mayor. My wife, my family, friends and members of the general public have weighed in. I’ve been under fire prior to day one.”

He went on to say that most if not all of his motions — “intended to contribute to a safer community and more fiscally responsible City Hall” — have been voted down by the council.

(Image: Mel Rothenburger)

“It’s frustrating to deal with allegation after allegation and then be muffled by council when I tried to set the record straight with the truth,” he added.

I was wrong with my prediction that he’d challenge the eight councillors to resign along with him and run in a byelection but I can’t be right a hundred percent of the time, can I?

“After much consideration I’ve decided I must stay on as mayor and run in the next municipal election,” he announced.

So now everyone can stop asking him about the calls from council for his resignation.

The event, though, was quite smart — he had the “floor” all to himself in front of 50 or so supporters and a gaggle of media, without interruptions from councillors or City staff. Not only has he led all the news reports for the day, but he’s trending on social media as well.

His supporters shouted “council must go,” “re-elect Reid,” and carried signs that said, ‘City council needs to resign not the mayor,’ ‘Our mayor has integrity,’ and ‘Keep it fair If Mayor Reid is to resign then so should the City council resign.’

While much of his campaign-style speech, which he read from a prepared script, was about his priorities as mayor, there were some interesting asides. One was his hint that a group of RHJ supporters is looking at running for council seats in 2026. Another was that he was physically assaulted. He wouldn’t give details of what happened, only that it occurred last month, and that RCMP are investigating.

There was a bit of an unfortunate incident involving CHNL talk-show host Brett Mineer when the mayor asked him to “step back” so a video journalist behind him with a camera could get closer. As Mineer stood his ground, the mayor fired a few unpleasantries at him including an invitation to leave, and members of the crowd joined in asking him to step back, then chanted “Brett, go home! Brett go home!”

Although it was no doubt unsettling for Mineer (he said later he was “rattled” and had dry mouth the rest of the day), he can relax. There was never any hint he was in jeopardy from the crowd. This was not a mob.

Nevertheless, the mayor has now been declared persona non grata at the station unless he apologizes.

Hamer-Jackson should know better than to keep getting into it with Mineer. As I’ve said before, these are two people who shouldn’t talk to each other, ever. At least, treat him the same as any other reporter regardless of their obvious animosity for each other. Stop singling him out for snide remarks — the incident with Mineer was out of place.

(By the way, Mineer doesn’t seem to like the fact that some people took pictures of him. I wasn’t one, but as I was talking to the mayor before things got started, Mineer suddenly appeared, took a photo of us, and quickly walked away. I don’t know why he wanted the photo, and don’t really care. I didn’t feel intimidated.)

Here’s what’s really interesting about the whole exercise, though. By calling a press conference and getting a large number of supporters to show up, along with all kinds of media, Hamer-Jackson has signalled a new way of doing things.

Instead of futile attempts to pursue his priorities within City Hall and in front of council, he’s taking his message straight to the public and media (as much as he often complains about the way he’s treated by the latter). As he said during the scrum after his speech, “I can do a lot of stuff without putting a motion forward to council.”

His strategy now seems to be to rebuild the momentum with the public that he enjoyed leading up to election day. Council long ago decided to ignore the mayor and work without him; now, the mayor has apparently decided to bypass the council.

So here’s another prediction: there will be more events like the one today.

Mel Rothenburger is a former regular contributor to CFJC-TV and CBC radio, publishes the ArmchairMayor.ca opinion website, and is a recipient of the Jack Webster Foundation Lifetime Achievement Award, and a Webster Foundation Commentator of the Year finalist. He has served as mayor of Kamloops, school board chair and TNRD director, and is a retired daily newspaper editor.  He can be reached at mrothenburger@armchairmayor.ca.

Mel Rothenburger's avatar
About Mel Rothenburger (11739 Articles)
ArmchairMayor.ca is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At ArmchairMayor.ca he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

19 Comments on ROTHENBURGER – What the mayor’s news conference was really all about

  1. Unknown's avatar Walter Trkla // July 17, 2024 at 9:42 AM // Reply

    Pierre and Bronwen right on.  Democracy is defined as majority rule, majority being greater than 50 per cent. In any election, in Canada today, municipal, provincial and federal when more than two political parties or persons are running in an election with a “first-past-the-post” system in place, you do not have a democracy, In 2021 federal election 62% of Canadians voted and the Liberals received 32% of the votes and formed a minority government.. So how many people in Canada voted for the liberals, 20%. Even with 20% of the vote a political party can win a majority if they win most of the constituencies with small populations. In Canada, only lip service is paid to this idea called democracy. It’s a culture across governments in Canada that erodes transparency which is mainly due to control of the narrative which is bought by money and media control. Democracy in Canada needs a wholesale reset, and that will only happen with proportional representation.     

    Liked by 1 person

  2. yes, well said David.

    I’m ha having trouble understanding how Rothenberger sees this as a win for the mayor

    Like

  3. I often wondered how people picked a candidate in the last municipal election so I took a quick poll of about 30 of my acquaintances who actually took the time to vote. Not surprisingly – most voted for Katie because of her looks. Others voted for Reid because they followed his son playing for the Vancouver warriors. One voted for Ray because he was so helpful when they were locked out of their car. One that voted for Reid said it was because he was the only one who answered their emaiI. Another voted for Mr. Karpuk because they were going to a chiropractor. A few chose anyone that lived on the North shore because they felt everything major was happening across the river. Scary! Not speaking well doesn’t mean you are stupid, nor does looking good mean you are smart. I didn’t vote for Reid in the last election but I’m changing my mind.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Unknown's avatar Wilma Thot // July 16, 2024 at 12:09 PM // Reply

      In my experience, Reid has been the only one that consistently replies to enquiries (nearly 100% response rate).

      Council has been pathetic in that regard. I’d estimate (15% response rate). Most have not responded at all. That is perhaps more telling than any other indicator, of who is really in this job for the people of this community. The Mayor has even responded to critical feedback. Council can’t fathom receiving critical feedback. They don’t want to hear from you period. Those BS town halls with the pre-selected topics is just one example.

      NO INCUMBENTS 2026. VOTE THEM OUT.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. Unknown's avatar Wilma Thot // July 16, 2024 at 8:30 AM // Reply

    I didn’t realize Brett Mineer had dry mouth after the incident. I hope he’s OK? If Mr. Mineer doesn’t like being photographed, he should refrain from leaving his house.

    In all seriousness, people have a right to express different options and shouldn’t be castigated for showing up. Challenged, sure. But let’s keep things civil and invite opposing perspectives while maintaining a respectful dialogue. The parking thing, I’d done on purpose, is childish.

    The campaign started yesterday. It should be our duty to invite others into the fold so we can garner support to have all the incumbents tossed out after the next election.

    Let them make all the MAGA references they want. They’re scared of change and grasping at tired tropes.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Unknown's avatar Rob Madsen // July 16, 2024 at 6:53 AM // Reply

    Just a reminder that in 2022:

    • Roughly 30% of eligible voters turned out to cast their ballots.
    • 7,298 voters cast their ballot for Reid Hamer-Jackson.
    • 15,789 voters cast their ballot for someone other than Reid Hamer-Jackson.
    • By a 2-1 margin, Kamloops voters did not want Reid Hamer-Jackson to be their Mayor. Yet here we are.

    Unless an overwhelming number of voters over the next two years suddenly believe Mr. Jackson is suitable to be their Mayor, it seems rather unlikely that he will be in the Mayor’s chair following the 2026 municipal election.

    The Mayor and Council are 9 people who need to make decisions about this city and how to most effectively govern it. It takes all 9 to cooperate and collaborate on decisions and solutions. That starts with leadership from the Mayor, and to date, I haven’t seen it demonstrated.

    Like

    • The same questionable math could’ve been applied to any other candidates if one wants to pathetically justify any possible outcome. The reality is RHJ campaigned on accountability and he is still demanding that. The other reality is all other council members have also mentioned accountability in their campaign but are seemingly no longer in that.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Unknown's avatar Rob Madsen // July 16, 2024 at 5:38 PM //

        How is it pathetic to show that more people did not vote for RHJ than did vote for him?

        Like

    • Your math comparison is faulty. Each council candidate had a 1/3 chance of getting a vote (8 votes over 23 candidates) which each mayoral candidate had a 1/5 chance of getting a vote. This explains the lower vote count for mayoral candidates.

      I like your idea of getting rid of ‘first past the post’ municipal voting and instituting proportional representation. It would also be worth considering a ward system for Kamloops

      Like

  6. Mayor news aside one has to look with a critical eye to the actual workings of the council of eight. Is the “Build Kamloops” something that really required strenuous effort on their part? Certainly not, not by a long shot. Do all those rezoning applications regularly coming in front of them require any in depth discussion and careful planning/analysis? Again certainly not, not by a long shot. So really one has to critically ask what are they really doing besides keeping their chairs warm? Why isn’t the talk host from a pointless low value local radio station getting involved in analyzing the actual value provided by this council to the broader community?

    Like

    • Unknown's avatar Rob Madsen // July 16, 2024 at 5:41 PM // Reply

      How is my math comparison faulty? over 15K voters did not vote RHJ for mayor, more than double those that did. I said nothing about council. My comment and showing the results of the vote was for mayor only, the subject of this story.

      Like

  7. Unknown's avatar Wilma Thot // July 15, 2024 at 9:25 PM // Reply

    Council and administration may learn how badly they overplayed their hand(s). The years and years of arrogance are now public knowledge. The attempts to shovel the PAC down the throats of taxpayers as if it’s a foregone conclusion are being actively opposed. The media spin is being countered on social media and by truly independent media outlets like this.

    All it will take is electing 4 council persons sympathetic to the Mayor. That is not a difficult thing to do. If that happens, city administration and any remaining legacy council members better buckle up. The games and gravy train will be well and truly over.

    Reid proved today that he is far more wiley than many give him credit for. He made a brilliant move today – in essence, the campaign begins today, and like minded prospective council persons should take note and begin planning now.

    Council would do well to think about who a taxpayer might vote for. A person actively listening to the concerns of the community, who engages and responds personally, or a group of arrogant legacy incumbents who actively diminish the participation of the public, and conduct business like elites who know better than thou, whilst patting themselves on the back at every opportunity.

    Like

  8. Lest we forget the councillors’ March 17/23 grandstanding Statement when speaking of ‘controlling the narrative, lol.’

    Maybe the mayor’s just fighting fire with fire by releasing his own statement. There are always two sides. The councillors’ protests that they are blameless victims is getting old, especially since they’ve helped stir the pot by publicly commenting on closed meeting items that should have remained private.

    As for the crowd of supporters there: I saw that group emerge from a grassroots initiative on facebook after the media event was announced. Someone suggested it, and others joined in. I doubt the mayor had any direct influence on their gathering, behaviour or parking ability.

    Like

  9. Unknown's avatar Gary Warman // July 15, 2024 at 8:19 PM // Reply

    I was there. And it was wonderful to see so many supporters. I started demonstrating in front of city hall because of the despicable actions of the councilors. and their lack of integrity. For the mayor to continue in spite of this negativity, demonstrates his strength and integrity. Way to go Reid.

    This is why my sign states that the all the councilors must resign.

    More demonstrators are needed. The more the merrier.

    Gary Warman

    Liked by 1 person

  10. well, that was a non event to say the last. I found it quite silly, typical of the Mayor.

    Like

  11. Unknown's avatar John Noakes // July 15, 2024 at 7:03 PM // Reply

    Take a few minutes to compare today’s event to the debacle the councillors presented on St. Patrick’s Day 2023.  They shamed themselves and lost any integrity they had.  We also ended up paying ongoing legal fees for one who is accused of slandering the Mayor.

    Today’s event was first class.  The media came expecting to hear something from the Mayor and he delivered. 

    Lori, the First Lady, has the best man at City Hall.

    Liked by 1 person

  12. Soo … he called out the media to do a Kamloops sized supporter fueled rally, the only news being that this is the playbook he’s running on; media opportunities scheduled by him, where he controls the narrative.

    Sound familiar?

    I would recommend he work on a Sage Green baseball MKGA hat.
    I mean literally, its the exact same MO.

    I would also suggest that local media need to shut this down, and not respond or show up to any future attempts to curate the message in this way. We on the voter side are all fine with the status quo City communication/ media reporting system. Lets not empower this.

    From the other side, at least now I know to ignore any attempted policy manifesto based announcements from the viewpoint parking lot, or some other soapbox locale.

    Did you ask for your fuel expenses back?
    Long way to go for what?

    Like

    • Unknown's avatar Bob Gamble // July 16, 2024 at 5:55 AM // Reply

      Well said David.

      Anyone expecting an olive branch was sadly disappointed. Just more pit bull politics and finger pointing.

      RHJ doesn’t have a vision or road map for success only a wish list.

      Like

Leave a reply to Gary Warman Cancel reply