BUILD KAMLOOPS – How the impact on taxes will work

(Image: Mel Rothenburger)
Questions and answers between ArmchairMayor.ca and City communications manager Kristen Rodrigue on the Build Kamloops proposal:
QUESTION 1:
As I understand it, the additional $25 per year tax would actually be compounded, so that in year two the taxpayer will pay $50 more than at the start, in year three $75 and so on. At the end of year five, the cost per taxpayer would be $125 more per year until the debt is paid at year 30. Am I correct? And does this pay for the entire $275 million borrowed?
ANSWER:
The actual impact to taxes required to service this new debt is a 1% tax increase per year for 5 years, which is approximately $25 more per year for the average household. So based on today’s tax rate, you will be paying $125 more per year in 5 years ($25 per year x 5 years) and that amount will remain in your taxes in perpetuity (just like we’re still paying for any increases that were included in 2022 or 2023 as we pay our 2024 taxes). Each year we look at the tax rate as a % or $ increase over the previous year, so what we’re outlining is what portion of your annual tax increase for the next 5 years will fund this program. This is the same model that was used for the successful Tournament Capital project borrowing.
We currently budget for (collect taxes for) up to $6 million a year, which is approximately 4.6% of our total revenue. As we add the 1% each year, that budget will gradually increase to $14 million by 2029, in time to take out the first significant loan for Build Kamloops. We need permission now to take on the borrowing (in order to advance the projects, seek grants and donations, etc.) but we don’t actually need to borrow any significant amount until the facilities actually open. So we are able to build our borrowing capacity as we build these facilities and then take out our loan without any large single year tax increase.
Here is a graph to outline what I’m talking about.

The green bars are our historical and projected payments based on current debt. 2024 is marked with a star. The yellow bars demonstrate the additional debt servicing required for this $275 million, as we incur it. The red line is our current debt servicing budget – this is the amount of tax funding we collect each year to make our payments. While we currently budget for $6 million dollars per year in debt servicing, we haven’t needed that much since 2017. The difference between what we collect (the red line) and what we pay (the bars) is invested to offset future borrowing costs (like the spikes we see between 2031 and 2037) and respond to interest-rate volatility and other market changes. This position will strengthen even more as interest rates drop.
Finally, we have other debt retiring over this same time period that also frees up debt servicing funds that will be applied to this. (As the green bars go down, the yellow bars take that space).
So the 1% per year is the amount we need to add to our current budget to afford this new debt. Therefore the only additional funding required from residents to fund this program is approximately $25 per household per year for the average household. The alternative would be to apply a one-time large tax increase when we borrow the money, but a moderate, gradual increase is easier for most people to accommodate, hence the reason Council is introducing a small increase each year for the next 5 years.
And yes, this will pay for the entire $275 million borrowed.
QUESTION 2:
Is the plan to present the various projects for approval in one counter petition/ alternative approval process, or separately for each project. eg. would the PAC be separate?
ANSWER:
The draft bylaws were presented to Council on June 25 as two separate loan authorization bylaws:https://kamloops.civicweb.net/document/186333/REP_BK%20update.pdf?handle=6A70182B3DC445D182406BB1338999BF
The borrowing bylaws for this AAP are currently with the province for approval.
Two loan authorization bylaws will mean two elector response forms / two concurrent AAPs.
QUESTION 3:
How will the APP forms be distributed?
ANSWER:
The forms will be available at City Hall for sure, and perhaps online as well. These details will all be presented to Council and the public before the AAP launches.
QUESTION 4:
How many parking stalls are included in the new plan for the PAC?
ANSWER:
The design includes approximately 125 parking stalls. This is in addition to the 450 stalls announced as part of the Cancer Centre project, which will also increase the parking capacity in the downtown core.
QUESTION 5:
What is the expected deadline for the AAPs? Will the 30-day countdown be during the summer months?
ANSWER:
We anticipate the 30 day window to fall sometime between mid-August and the end of September, depending on when we hear back from the province. So the deadline will be in September. Once we have statutory approval, we will be bringing another report to Council outlining the advertising dates, the deadline for receipt of responses, the estimated number of electors, and the elector response form, as well as the process for submitting that.
Preforming Arts Center is a great idea, a vision, just like McArthur Island was many years ago. I would love to see PAC built as it speaks to out humanness. However, we must look at the cost-benefit of decisions so we need to ask critical questions: e.g. What are the priorities? What are the costs and benefits of a Preforming Arts Center vs a ring road to move traffic through and in and out of the city? What were the costs and benefits of locating a prison in Kamloops without looking at the impact of this decision on education, crime, homelessness, drug use, as well as traffic.
City Hall must forget building bridges as political stepping stones and make decisions on proven principles rather than looking towards the next election. Halston Bridge won 4 elections for CR, and ever since it was built it had to be resurfaced. You can’t please everyone, so prioritize. Get the homeless situation under control as it impacts everything, we want this city to be.
What are the costs and benefits of locating a hostel, low-cost housing and safe injection sites within two blocks of each other. What impact does this have on traffic, tourism, shopping, crime, panhandling. Mostly negative. A bridge, hospital and a jail get you elated but such decisions leave the city taxpayer with the negative impact and future costs.
Everything that we do has a positive or negative effect and when we don’t plan ahead inflationary costs, congestion and quick fixes lead to higher costs.
Like all settlements in BC schools, hospitals, police station, court house, city administration, and arena were built to serve the core settlement. Kamloops followed the Vancouver, Victoria and Kelowna example.
As the population, increased, so did the traffic into the core due to services remaining in the core. This remains an attitude of planners and down town business owners today. The down town business applied pressure on the city council to provide faster transportation, and parking, eventually a larger hospital and courthouse were added in the core bringing thousands of cars into down town. Also, banking and city services remain in the core. Attempts to change this mindset, to make the core more people oriented, was always challenged by the down town business, while at the same time they wanted the city to provide more parking rather than making the core a place where people want to visit live, socialize, and relax
LikeLike
Using the Westlands RIH Cancer Center Parkade as an angle to promote increased downtown parking is a very obvious slight of hand, bit of attention twisting chunk of clear and intentional misdirection.
The Cancer Center, where this PAC parking relieving new parkade is … where?
Drive up the hill towards the hospital above Columbia on 3rd.
As you drive up towards the old Emergency,
dont turn left to the new front door,
but instead much further up, turn right between St. Annes School and The Phoenix Center
and then continue westward. Thats where the Cancer Center will be.
… now imaging after a show, you are walking all the way up there to get the car, might have grandma with a walker, or kids there for a kids show or maybe you left them outside the PAC so you could walk up to get the car … which would take at least 30+ minutes … in January …
It is completely inappropriate to suggest using that parkade as the same breath answer to a question about PAC parking.
I’m not saying I have any answers to downtown parking, other than building more is up to the City, not the PAC. I am saying that this should not be the cities answer, as stated by the City Communications Manager.
LikeLike
What 250 cancer stalls are they referring to? One’s up where the clinic will be? If so, quite a hike, not exactly in the downtown core. What was the capacity of the PAC again? Only 125 stalls? And of those stalls how many will be reserved for staff and entertainers? If you go down town at night there are very few street stalls available until after 9 or so. Where are these people going to park for the PAC? I am not against it , just the cost and location. I rarely go downtown to shop because the parking is taken up with people who work downtown, very similar to the hospital parkade where more than half the parking is taken up by staff and the folks who need to use it have to park elsewhere or drive around for ages to find a spot. Face it, people are lazy and want to park as close as they can. Folks with disabilities or seniors have no choice.
LikeLike
Unbelievable! The city was being coy with the math, but the admission of the real cost is astounding! $125 extra tax per year by the 5 year mark, in perpetuity, after a nearly 10 digit tax increase?
The APP forms *might* be available online? Who do these people think they are? In 2024, you *might* put forms online for such a substantial ask?
So the city and council were disingenuous in their lack of clear explanation of the costs, and is still uncertain if they want to make it easier for people to obtain the “No” voting form?
Citizens of Kamloops, get your Gold Bond medicated powder ready, as there’s a real possibility we’re going to have to trek to city hall in this heat to put a stop to these flagrant spendthrifts with a resounding “No” vote.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Not to get in the way of some great entertainment but did “Build Kamloops” not factor in the expense of building a new RCMP detachment and City Hall?
Just asking……..these would seem to be a priority aka necessities as opposed to things “that might be nice to have”.
LikeLike
The forms will be available at City Hall possibly online…sure make it inconvenient as hell to voice a different opinion. There is a pattern there…
There will be parking issues comes event time guaranteed.
But before we get to event time there will be costs overrun guaranteed, and “warranty” issues too.
But for sure a PAC is in every sizable city so we should get one too. I am actually looking forward to a Carmina Burana played in a proper concert hall.
And an aquatic center in the North Shore would also be a good thing.
And a considerable amount of investment in more separate cycling pathways would get my full support. But hockey? No thanks.
LikeLike