LATEST

GUEST COLUMN – B.C. is plagued by dysfunctional municipal councils

(Image: Mel Rothenburger)

Once you start examining the dysfunctional councils around B.C., you quickly conclude it’s best to keep a large supply of eye wash on hand

By STAN BARTLETT
Vice Chair, Grumpy Taxpayer$ of Greater Victoria

WHEN A PARENT stands by watching children year after year throw sand in each other’s face, what’s the owner of a daycare to do?

The parent, that’s the provincial government, is responsible for dozens of municipalities and sets the playground rules through the dated Community Charter and the Local Government Act.

The owner of the playground, that’s the taxpayer and the voter, sits on the park bench, pays all the bills and expects everyone to behave. The adults watch in disbelief and dismay.

Once you start examining the dysfunctional councils around B.C., you quickly conclude it’s best to keep a large supply of eye wash on hand.

In 2021, we looked at various dysfunctional councils in a commentary entitled “Constant controversy swirling around local councils.”

Lantzville, Sayward, Qualicum Beach, North Saanich, Saanich and Victoria were flagged as dysfunctional. But the poster child for council disharmony went to Nanaimo, which at one point garnered national headlines as “Canada’s most dysfunctional city.” Council discord went on for years but thankfully has stabilized.

Let’s take a look at those considered dysfunctional today.

Ratepayers know all about Langford council, which just approved a punishing property tax hike of 15.6 per cent. During the past 18 months, it has been the epicentre of most controversies (with Victoria coming in a close second).

This latest dust-up had protesters once again waving signs outside city hall.

Delta council staged what some are describing as a “palace coup.”

Councillors voted to remove the mayor as the city’s representative to Metro Vancouver and limited his powers of office.

His removal from the Metro board has implications beyond Delta, as it means a change of leadership for the regional body, which he has chaired since 2022. It’s responsible for billions of taxpayer dollars and major decisions about infrastructure and regional planning.

As well, seven motions appear to limit the power of the mayor to perform certain actions without council approval, including organizing events, sending official correspondence and changing meeting agendas.

Kamloops council has been in a bitter dispute with the mayor since the 2022 municipal election. Following a damning report by a provincially appointed municipal adviser, council has asked the mayor to resign. He refuses.

A report into the matter was critical of the mayor’s behaviour toward council and city staff, saying he has shown “a dismissive and condescending attitude towards constructive criticism or the suggestion of apologies,” and that his treatment of staff may have led to an unsafe work environment.

There have been multiple investigations, a defamation lawsuit filed by the mayor against a councillor and the mayor suspending the city’s acting chief administrative officer in a bid to “change things up.”

Surrey, the second largest municipality, has been fighting with the province over an order to replace the RCMP with the Surrey Police Service.

In one corner is Public Safety Minister Mike Farnworth, and in the other corner, Surrey Mayor Brenda Locke, in what has become an unseemly personal conflict. The dispute has ended up in court, even though the losers are already known — residents and taxpayers.

The province brought in mandatory codes of conduct this year, which so far hasn’t improved things. That’s probably because councillors might only complain about one another, since the public is conveniently shut out from laying complaints. It’s not considering municipal recall legislation.

So should we look to Alberta where proposed legislation on municipalities would give the provincial cabinet more power over cities and towns? It would give cabinet the power to remove members of council, toss out bylaws, and allow political parties to run in Edmonton and Calgary.

Small villages have their share of long-standing troubles.

Harrison Hot Springs council has been dysfunctional for months and just tried to dissolve the municipality. The province says they cannot move to dissolve since there’s no legislative provisions allowing a council to fire themselves.

Lions Bay has seen three senior staff members and a councillor quit or be fired since the election. The CBC captured the drama in a story about a year ago entitled, “A new mayor, a small town and a giant political upheaval: tensions in Lions Bay, B.C.”

Sayward council is still at odds with each other and the community, leading one councillor to resign. A provincial adviser started working with the village and will report back with recommendations in a few months.

You have to wonder if local politicians know about the job demands before and after taking on the responsibility. As it stands, before and after orientation training is minimal and optional in B.C. So should we make it mandatory as proposed by the Alberta legislation?

On the eve of a provincial election, the province government seems wilfully blind to the scale of dysfunction in local government. There’s no talk yet about rejuvenating municipal affairs and renewing underlying legislation.

Premier David Eby and Minister of Municipal Affairs Anne Kang, civil discourse and order need to return to the sandbox.

Stan Bartlett is the vice-chair of Grumpy Taxpayer$ of Greater Victoria, a non-partisan citizens advocacy group for municipal taxpayers. He describes himself as “a bedraggled taxpayer of 50 years.” This commentary is published with his permission.

Mel Rothenburger's avatar
About Mel Rothenburger (11580 Articles)
ArmchairMayor.ca is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At ArmchairMayor.ca he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

3 Comments on GUEST COLUMN – B.C. is plagued by dysfunctional municipal councils

  1. Theres an opinion out there that suggests that all this turmoil is a good thing as it plainly shows that voters are opting to intentionally install trigger happy, difficult to work with characters who are predisposed to bringing civil operations to a standstill … as if thats a good thing on its own.

    News flash … it isnt. All thats succeeded in being done, is a large whack of annual incomes and expenses being charged to the public purse, with inadequate work being done to show for it. Some will say that the work of the past was also inadequate, or too expensive or poorly decided, and some of that may be arguably accurate … but at the very least the work was being done. The wheels turned.

    The main difference I find is that in the long past, a certain amount of well balanced decorum and appropriate behaviour was shown and shared by elected officials and staff at every level of government, and that was mostly mirrored by voters, citizens and residents who interacted in these spaces.

    Now it seems that the conflicting, emotionally charged dysfunction that we see in federal politics, and as seen south of the border, has crept into our municipal politics, and who actually is in charge is the voter that rolls in this world of voting for the lowest common denominator … because of some need for a protest vote, because they feel empowered by those making intentional political hay from this style of dysfunction mindset.

    Until these voters get bored, we cant expect anything to change.

    Like

  2. Unknown's avatar ryanell616 // May 16, 2024 at 10:41 AM // Reply

    It’s almost as if the public is actually using their voting power to fight against the status quo…

    Liked by 1 person

  3. I don’t think Provincial power over municipalities is the right solution. David Eby’s concerns certainly aren’t our own. He would not be accountable should he want to turn Kamloops into a hub haven for decriminalization while excluding other cities closer to his own neighbourhood.

    The answer is recall legislation for citizens to yank a council person off the stage with a hook. It would need to be accessible enough to not have an unreasonably high barrier, but also not low enough to end up with continual disruptions to democracy and decision making.

    It should be a simple majority vote. 51% of citizens vote to toss the scoundrels out, and out they go. It could be an online process, validated by some identifier like your city taxes, or mailing address. It wouldn’t have to be costly. Certainly no more costly than having another 2.5 years of this council patting itself on the back at every opportunity whilst doing very little to nothing to address the main concerns of voters.

    This council, in all its underachievement, will likely spur a new era of municipal politics in the years to come. But somehow I don’t think they’re going to like it.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to ryanell616 Cancel reply