LATEST

EDITORIAL – Is the mayor of Kamloops suddenly only allowed to work 9 to 5?

An editorial by Mel Rothenburger.

UPDATE (Sunday afternoon): Mayor Reid Hamer-Jackson phoned back to say he’d found an email notifying him and councillors that access into City Hall would be unavailable after business hours. Which means the mayor shouldn’t have been surprised today that he couldn’t get into the building. It doesn’t solve the issue, though, of his need to get into his office to get work done outside of business hours. Since staff aren’t there after hours, he asks rhetorically, why do they need protection from bullying during those times?

‘HAVE YOU EVER been locked out of your own office?!” the voice on the other end of the phone wanted to know.

It was shortly after lunch when Mayor Reid Hamer-Jackson’s phone number came up on my call display. He was not happy, reason being that he’d gone in to City Hall this Sunday afternoon (April 21, 2024) to do some work and found himself locked out.

This comes not long after he and the rest of council were banned from staff areas of City Hall and other facilities, ostensibly to protect employees against bullying. But this takes the vise being squeezed on the mayor to a new level, assuming the whole thing isn’t just a big mistake.

We won’t know for sure until tomorrow because senior administrators don’t work on weekends and contacting them during their off days is discouraged.

“Do they want me to be a part-time mayor now?” Hamer-Jackson fumed.

A part-time mayor he isn’t. As he points out, “the mayor is the CEO.” Mayors (and councillors, for that matter) aren’t hourly employees. Mayors are used to going into the office after normal hours, in the evenings or weekends. That’s why you might see their vehicle parked in the mayor’s spot at any time day or night.

When the mayor has work to do, the mayor should have free access to his office and, I can tell you, locking the mayor out after 9 to 5 and on weekends is something new. At least, I certainly was never restricted in any way from getting into City Hall to get work done when I was in office.

If administration has taken another unilateral step, or if this is simply an invisible part of the now notorious key-fob change, councillors should put away their rubber stamp for once and get behind Hamer-Jackson to demand the situation be rectified. It’s an impediment to the civic democratic process.

So, let’s wait and see what happens but if locking the mayor out of access to his office today was intentional, there should be hell to pay, and taxpayers should be raising hell right along with the mayor and councillors.

Mel Rothenburger is a regular contributor to CFJC Today, publishes the ArmchairMayor.ca opinion website, and is a recipient of the Jack Webster Foundation Lifetime Achievement Award. He has served as mayor of Kamloops, school board chair and TNRD director, and is a retired daily newspaper editor.  He can be reached at mrothenburger@armchairmayor.ca.

Mel Rothenburger's avatar
About Mel Rothenburger (11613 Articles)
ArmchairMayor.ca is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At ArmchairMayor.ca he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

11 Comments on EDITORIAL – Is the mayor of Kamloops suddenly only allowed to work 9 to 5?

  1. Locking people out of their offices, restricting their access to work areas, cutting off their ability to confer with colleagues, leaking personal information about them, accusing them of things they did not do are all signs of constructive dismissal.

    Like

  2. Unknown's avatar Gerry Sherk // April 22, 2024 at 11:37 AM // Reply

    Nothing we can do with this pettiness right now but obviously a clean sweep for next election is necessary. Are they really taking money from us for the non-stop plotting? 

    Liked by 1 person

  3. We need to focus on getting a bloc of new council persons for the next election – one that will vote together on the major issues that voters made decisions on; which are also the issues that most councillors are doing little to nothing to address. It could be a relatively simple platform: street disorder, capital projects, affordability, crime, and cleanup crew.

    This bloc would ensure that the Mayor could fire the allowed administrative positions under the charter, and overrule the nonsense going on. They could run on a platform of cleaning house. We need a serious group of new individuals committed to changing the rot at city hall. Install a new administrator that will do the bidding of rhe bloc, and teach the belligerent municipal employees who is in charge.

    Liked by 3 people

  4. Unknown's avatar Lon Connor // April 21, 2024 at 7:16 PM // Reply

    This council is not what I voted for. I will not vote for anyone of them again.

    They have hamstringed the mayor from day one, I voted for this mayor to make changes and work outside the box on the issues plaguing our city. There is not one council member that I would have given that confidence and they have proved themselves deviecive and incapable.

    Liked by 2 people

  5. I keep on saying it, getting rid of McCorkell is THE right thing to do. A clean slate at the top would further usurp the power balance in the city but it would be such a wonderful spring-cleanup type thing.

    Liked by 3 people

  6. Unknown's avatar John Noakes // April 21, 2024 at 2:28 PM // Reply

    Hmmmmm

    It seems a bit of a stretch for the Mayor to be locked out of his office.  He is a fellow who has had his own business for a number of years. If he can’t be trusted, then maybe there should be something put in writing as a prerequisite before an individual runs for public office.

    I happened to meet a fellow at the gun show this morning.  The guy used to be in a “position of authority” in the corporation.  I said that it must be tough trying to wear the Mayor’s shoes these days.  The guy replied, “Don’t talk to me about that a**hole. He deserves everything he’s getting!”  Really?

    So, he’s banned from doing work on weekends or after hours. What if there needs to be something done at one of the other places owned by the City and paid for by the taxpaying citizens?

    Does this include the two pre-engineered metal buildings at the City’s new Works Yard at 955 Concordia Way?  Those buildings were supplied by Fretz Construction Ltd. in 2006, paid for by the citizens of Kamloops through municipal tax dollars.

    PDF is not redacted and is available on line:

    https://kamloops.civicweb.net/document/8576/

    Like

    • Wow–a $2 million contract! Was Jen Fretz in or leading the Civic Operations department at the time?

      Like

      • Unknown's avatar Mel Rothenburger // April 22, 2024 at 8:21 AM //

        A Jan. 9, 2024 InfoNews story headlined “No, a Kamloops city staffer did not give contracts to family business” says, “In 2006, (Jen) Fretz did work for the city but she was a supervisor in the environmental services department and would not have had a hand in the bidding process.” https://infotel.ca/newsitem/kamloops-city-staffer-didnt-give-contracts-to-their-family-business/it102580

        Like

      • Unknown's avatar John Noakes // April 22, 2024 at 8:30 AM //

        Just one of those documents that are available for public viewing, Bronwen.

        Should there be some questions asked about the guidelines that are in writing for ALL city staffers to ensure public confidence is met with respect to any questions about possible conflict of interest?

        I mean, the Mayor’s used car lot seems to have been a sore spot as far as conflict of interest is concerned.

        Is fair played on a level playing field?

        Like

  7. I’ll agree with this one. He’s got to be able to get in when he needs to.
    Lets hope its just a key fob timing – programing issue that can be rectified.
    We can safely assume that on a Sunday at midnight,
    there wont be many staff around for Mayors or Council members to bully about.

    We can set aside the question as to if there is any point in him having non office hours access … considering the loggerhead happening between him and Council … regarding if he really has any valued work to do, for another day.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. Unknown's avatar wbrianbeck // April 21, 2024 at 2:08 PM // Reply

    Well Reid (and Mel). I guess there are consequences for bad behaviour, which you seem to have lots of. On the other hand it is not reasonable for you or any Councillor to not have access to your offices outside of regular working hours. I hope that it gets worked out satisfactorily, and I hope that you and the Councillors start to work on city business, rather than petty squabbles. These are embarrasing.

    Like

Leave a reply to Pierre Cancel reply