EDITORIAL – A letter to all those anonymous keyboard commenters
An editorial by Mel Rothenburger.
HELLO, MY NAME is Mel Rothenburger.
Pretty much every day, I express opinions on what’s going on in the world. You always know that it’s me when I do so, whether it be in editorials, columns or social media comments.
I’ve always been of the opinion that people should stand behind their convictions. Anonymous comments lose credibility. If you believe something, you should be willing to put your name to it.
Yet a lot of people don’t. They write incognito emails or make up fake names for their comments on things that are posted on this website. I understand why this is the case — they’re afraid of taking criticism for their opinions.
Yesterday, for example, I received an emailed letter on the issue of Kamloops Fire Rescue’s medical response role that made some good points. The writer didn’t provide their name “due to negative repercussions from above comments.”
I know all about repercussions. I’ve probably received more nasty comments, insults, threats and false allegations than you have. But I put my name behind what I say.
Still, I’ve been permissive when it comes to fake aliases because a lot of the comments do add some value to the discussion if they’re thoughtful and germane.
So, if someone uses a reasonable alias, or prefers to go by their first name only, I accept the comment. Recently, though, a lot of stuff has been coming in with aliases that are obviously made up on the spot or plain silly or worse.
If you signed a comment in the past few days with the pseudonym “Douk Bill” or “Manstral Cycle” or even “Calgon Take Me Away” or “Winners Don’t Use Drugs” or “No Rink” you may have noticed you haven’t been published.
That’s unfortunate because, with the exception of “Douk Bill’s” not-so-clever putdown about the Sons of Freedom, the comments were worth reading. I just think there should be a limit.
So, I’m asking this: please don’t be so shy about putting your name behind what you stand for. This website is described as “A forum on Kamloops and the world” and is meant to be a community discussion, so comments are important. If you have a genuine reason for fear of reprisal, send me a private email, with your real name, explaining why, and we can figure it out.
At the least, please pick a real name as your alias, and don’t use multiple aliases. Fair compromise?
From there, the only other guidelines I ask you to follow are my long-standing requests to avoid poor taste, insults and libel.
And, by the way, sincere thanks to the many commenters who already use their real names.
Mel Rothenburger is a regular contributor to CFJC Today, publishes the ArmchairMayor.ca opinion website, and is a recipient of the Jack Webster Foundation Lifetime Achievement Award. He has served as mayor of Kamloops, school board chair and TNRD director, and is a retired daily newspaper editor. He can be reached at mrothenburger@armchairmayor.ca.

Thank you for this Mel. It’s somewhat of a delicious conundrum, this internet thing.
Your editorial sets some parameters for the readers. This is good.
I would like to offer a counterpoint. Personally, I am a firm believer in the right to absolute privacy, with privacy being a human right. It is the individual’s choice to reveal their name online – no one else’s. No one should feel peer pressure to do so. I would argue that in this age, using your real name online is unwise. One of the biggest sites in the world assigns default anonymous names for the privacy and safety of users.
I would wager that avoiding criticism is the least applicable reason to remain anonymous. By the same argument, a pseudonym poster avoids accolades attributed to their name by going anonymous. I don’t know too many people scared of the opinions of other people on the internet. I have consulted the official “Internet Rules” guidebook, and it doesn’t seem to require real names either. Just what is “real” on the internet anyhow? There’s also the “right to be forgotten” legislation. It’s the law. Anonymity offers control over our own information.
An idea or comment expressed anonymously, is no less valid or meaningful than one with a name attributed. Imagine finding a book of exquisite poetry, or biting political commentary, or an anonymous news tip that breaks the Watergate scandal, but dismissing it entirely because it doesn’t come with photo ID.
Is “No Rink” any less real than “Tammy Johnson”? It’s all quite futile when chasing this concept to the logical conclusions: Tammy Johnson isn’t Tammy Johnson, she’s actually Mr. Rink. Or maybe Rink is Tammy’s last name. Or maybe they’re both different people with different “real” names. Or it’s two individuals sharing one anonymous account, and those two individuals made an anonymous pact together online, and don’t even know each other’s real names. Or maybe that’s really Tammy Johnson. How would you ever know? On the internet, they’re all anonymous. I appreciate all comments and opinions – whatever name is attached is meaningless to me. Maybe they’re all just taking the mick?
Of course, this is your site and you’re free to moderate as you see fit – although I do recall editorials here taking the city to task for removing the ability to comment and for restricting input. The notion of asking people to use real names on the internet is quite odd. It’s the internet after all.
So to those individuals who identify as anonymous, or anonymous fluid, I celebrate and accept your choices. The internet was designed to be free and open. That makes some people uncomfortable. Just like Bitcoin does. It’s about control. Mel, in his timeless wisdom, has offered up a compromise. Out of respect for the Armchair Mayor, for being one of the last bastions of local news and commentary, I think the “pick one name” concept is fair, and I will encourage that approach – for one, or all?
The undeniable, but unverifiable, Bill Hanson
LikeLike