EDITORIAL – Shhh, you may not talk at committee of the whole meetings
An editorial by Mel Rothenburger.
THE TAX INCREASE was on the agenda for discussion at a City council committee-of-the-whole meeting yesterday.
But if you’d been hoping to attend the three-hour meeting and ask questions about it, you’d have been out of luck. Same for other items on the agenda, such as the cultural strategic plan or a report from the parks engagement group.
The committee of the whole, which consists of all council members, is designed as a place where important stuff can be talked about in depth.
Talked about by council members only, that is. The public can attend but the public can’t talk because a new procedural bylaw doesn’t provide for anywhere on COTW agendas for public inquiries.
Former councillor Denis Walsh pointed this out at one of council’s regular meetings when the bylaw came up for adoption, noting that while COTW agendas do include a “civil discourse” statement there’s no opportunity for public discoursing.
Mel Rothenburger is a regular contributor to CFJC Today, publishes the ArmchairMayor.ca opinion website, and is a recipient of the Jack Webster Foundation Lifetime Achievement Award. He has served as mayor of Kamloops, school board chair and TNRD director, and is a retired daily newspaper editor. He can be reached at mrothenburger@armchairmayor.ca.

It seems that this council figures the people of Kamloops can afford more taxes while eating beans and wieners or mac and cheese while the dead wood in management is still getting paid. Maybe if this council looked inside their “little empires” and started to pare away unnecessary items than maybe taxes wouldn’t go up so much.
LikeLike
Like spending $6 million on a 30,000 sq ft vacant-lot-to-be on Tranquille road?
LikeLike
Am I right? Does council now introduce a provisional budget on a Tuesday and expect public input two days later on a Thursday (actually it’s not framed as input, but an information meeting)? https://letstalk.kamloops.ca/budget2024
Unless I’ve missed something, the City hasn’t given any advanced timeline or reasonable notice for the electorate to give input. Is this even legal?
LikeLike
The final document will still have to go to council for approval.
LikeLike
City hall seems to view the public as nuisances with deep pockets: to be heard as little as possible and milked for as much as possible.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The disdain for public input is very strong amongst administrators. The stronghold of administrators on a feeble council is producing the desired effects.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Committee of the Hole, maybe. Where participatory democracy comes to die.
LikeLiked by 1 person