EDITORIAL – ‘Community conversations’ a chance for council to redeem itself
An editorial by Mel Rothenburger.
KAMLOOPS RESIDENTS will have an opportunity to talk to City council through the coming winter and into next spring as a series of public meetings gets underway.
From October 25 to May 22, the meetings will be held in various neighbourhoods followed by a virtual version. Details were officially announced yesterday after months of wrangling, committee changes and turmoil within council.
The so-called “community conversations” have already come under criticism since some of the basics of the format were released a few weeks ago. Certainly, there are shortcomings, among them the fact they’re too many and too ambitious, dragging on for months when they’re supposed to be helping councillors formulate a strategic plan that’s already been adopted and which is, according to them, a “bold” one.
Indeed, I worry that the politicians and bureaucrats will spend too much time talking and not enough listening.
And there will be complaints they aren’t true town halls because of the way they’ll be segmented into table discussions. In fact, though, dividing the hall into “stations” to discuss various topics can be an effective way to provide more people with a chance for input and to summarize it all.
That only works if there’s also an opportunity for the assembly as a whole to come together at some point for a question and answer. That’s where the true town hall part comes in, and to their credit councillors have included that.
This drawn-out exercise could be council’s attempt to redeem itself for establishing a truly dismal record on public engagement and transparency — during its first year, it’s given the impression as a group that it’s unwilling to listen to criticism.
So, better now to take council’s words at face value when it says it wants to provide a way for residents to express concerns and frustrations “free from intimidation.”
There’s more to lose by staying away than there is by showing up and being heard.
I’m Mel Rothenburger, the Armchair Mayor.
Mel Rothenburger is a regular contributor to CFJC Today, publishes the ArmchairMayor.ca opinion website, and is a recipient of the Jack Webster Foundation Lifetime Achievement Award. He has served as mayor of Kamloops, school board chair and TNRD director, and is a retired daily newspaper editor. He can be reached at mrothenburger@armchairmayor.ca.

“… [meetings] are supposed to be helping councillors formulate a strategic plan that’s already been adopted”
Read that again carefully,
Ya … kinda lost me.
LikeLike
Well, since “community engagement” is already on the strategic plan, now they can tick it off!
LikeLike
I’m sure some people won’t be staying away on purpose, but the fact that the SE sector exercise is being held a few miles from the nearest bus stop at a venue that holds only 150 people, with very limited parking, might be a factor in low turnout there. And expecting people from Heffley Creek to attend their sector’s exercise at the Dunes instead of a more central location (like Westmount School) seems off-putting and the reverse of ‘climate action.’ Combining the downtown and West End with North Kamloops and calling it “Core” shows a lack of understanding of the diverse issues facing specific areas of our community. Factors like these make me think that this is just another lip-service nod with no real interest in community dialogue behind it.
LikeLike
Questions to them about St. Patrick’s Day 2023 should be raised and accurate answers be provided.
LikeLike
If there is listening it will manifest itself in a broad improvement in the various ways public life will be moving forward.
It will also manifest itself in the way public assets and resources are managed.
Given the stubborn nature of management and the inherent weaknesses of council I highly doubt there will be any significant changes coming.
LikeLike
Although I wholeheartedly am all for the the good ‘ole town hall idea, and loosely support the process of how this is being done here … it kinda lost me at “[the meetings] are supposed to be helping councilors formulate a strategic plan that’s already been adopted”,
Wait … what?
… then why would I want to be there?
Sold as public meetings where citizens have the opportunity to discuss issues with Council … when in fact it seems more like a chance for Council to talk citizens into stuff they already agreed and have likely … been funded … to do.
That means anything any citizen says, will probably be ‘listened to’ and just maybe ‘taken under advisement’ … but at the end of the meeting, its all for nothing, as they are going to do what they already had planned … but have a piece of paper that said they were there, and their necks are sore from nodding.
I ask again … why would I want to be there?
LikeLike