LATEST

EDITORIAL – ‘What are we trying to achieve by answering questions?’

City councillors at March news conference. (Image: Mel Rothenburger)

An editorial by Mel Rothenburger.

ONE OF THE MYSTERIES surrounding the joint statement by eight City councillors last March aimed at Mayor Reid Hamer-Jackson is their refusal to answer questions about some of the details.

Certain of those allegations against the mayor, of course, are now front and centre in the defamation lawsuit brought by him against Coun. Katie Neustaeter.

An earlier Freedom of Information application by the Armchair Mayor brought to light that Neustaeter played a key role in putting together the March 17 statement with input from the other councillors.

Included in that statement was the accusation that councillors “have been subjected to … violations of personal and professional boundaries.”

New information provides just a little more insight into councillor’ discussions leading up to the statement.

I asked the City’s FOI department to review several redactions it had made under the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act. The City refused to reconsider most of them but offered up two lines that had been redacted under Section 13(1) Policy advice/ recommendations.

One is a single sentence in an email from then deputy mayor Kelly Hall informing the other seven he would open the news conference and then pass it over to Neustaeter to read the joint statement.

Hall’s next sentence, which had originally been redacted, said, “I don’t want to give him a sliver of opportunity to suggest this statement is retaliation for removal of chair positions,” a reference to Hamer-Jackson’s decision to remove some of the councillors as chairs of standing committees.

The other newly released phrase is from Neustaeter in which she asked, in reference to the news conference, “What are we trying to achieve by answering questions?”

How these newly released parts of two emails could have been interpreted as policy advice or recommendations I don’t know. But they do indicate some of the thinking that went into the statement.

As for what answering questions would achieve, I have the answer: transparency.

Mel Rothenburger is a regular contributor to CFJC Today, publishes the ArmchairMayor.ca opinion website, and is a recipient of the Jack Webster Foundation Lifetime Achievement Award. He has served as mayor of Kamloops, school board chair and TNRD director, and is a retired daily newspaper editor. He can be reached at mrothenburger@armchairmayor.ca.

Mel Rothenburger's avatar
About Mel Rothenburger (11770 Articles)
ArmchairMayor.ca is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At ArmchairMayor.ca he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

3 Comments on EDITORIAL – ‘What are we trying to achieve by answering questions?’

  1. The Armchair Mayor is out here doing the peoples’ work. Spending that retirement money on expensive FOI requests is a worthy cause. Lord knows the City doesn’t appreciate him sniffing around. They would prefer to keep things opaque.

    But I think Mr. Mayor’s legal team is going to extract a high price from both the municipal employees and council members who were involved in this coordinated action. Can’t wait to see how this plays out.

    Like

  2. Unknown's avatar Bronwen Scott // June 27, 2023 at 6:58 AM // Reply

    If Coun. Hall didn’t want the chair changes and the inflammatory statements about the mayor to be conflated, then maybe the councillors should have held two ‘unofficial’ media events, lol.

    Like

  3. Unknown's avatar John Noakes // June 27, 2023 at 5:53 AM // Reply

    Again, thanks, Mel.
    It seems like quite a bit of forethought and planning for a meeting that Mr. Trawin said never officially happened.
    After all, they were officially on City business at a TNRD strategic planning committee.

    Like

Leave a reply to Bronwen Scott Cancel reply