BEPPLE – It’s time for TNRD to invite region’s First Nations to the table

(Image: Mel Rothenburger)

GO TO ANY SETTLER TOWN or city in B.C., and there will be a First Nations community close by.  The same can be said within the Thompson Nicola Regional District.

In Kamloops, Tk’emlúps te Secwe̓pemc is just over the bridge.  Neskonlith Indian Band and Adams Lake Indian Band are immediately adjacent to Chase.  Skeetchestn Indian Band is just down the road from Savona.  Across all of the TNRD are First Nations communities.

But if you attended a Thompson Nicola Regional District board meeting, it would be hard to know there are First Nations communities in the region.  First Nations representatives are absent from the board and committees of the TNRD.  Despite facing many of the same problems such as water, land use and solid waste, First Nation voices are absent.

Historically, that’s been the way things have been.  But times are changing.  Maybe not in the TNRD, but with other regional districts in B.C.

This week, the Capital Regional District (CRD) announced that its standing committees would now include representation from elected members of local First Nations.  The CRD encompasses thirteen municipalities, such as Victoria, Saanich and Sooke, and three unincorporated areas, such as Salt Spring Island.

The CRD joins a growing list of B.C. regional districts who have First Nations at committee or board tables.

For example, the Tsawwassen First Nation is a board member of the Greater Vancouver Regional District (GVRD).  The Sechelt Indian Government District (SIDG) participates as a full member on the Sunshine Coast Regional District.  The Nisga’a First Nation falls within a regional district electoral area (EA) of the Kitimat Stikine Regional District and all residents (First Nation and non-First Nation) vote for the EA Director. Four Treaty First Nations sit as members of the Regional District of Alberni-Clayoquot.

The way each of the First Nations representatives joined standing committees and or regional district boards was different.  Some were added because of treaty negotiations.  Others were added by the will of the board.

No matter how First Nations representation was added to a regional district, underpinning it is a desire to reconcile, and the valuing of First Nations voices in regional decision making.

As we take more and more steps towards reconciliation between First Nations and non-First First Nations, regional districts have an important role to play.

There are many issues that affect both First Nations and non-First Nations communities.  More and more, B.C. regional districts are seeing the value of having First Nation voices at the table.

It’s time the Thompson Nicola Regional District has First Nation voices at its table too.  There are so many issues, from land use, to water, to solid waste which affect everyone in the region.  Without First Nations at the table, solutions are incomplete, and valuable inputs are lost.

For too long, First Nations voices have been absent.  In the spirit of reconciliation, it’s time for the TNRD to invite the region’s First Nations to the table.

Nancy Bepple is a former City councillor of Kamloops with a strong interest in community building projects.

About Mel Rothenburger (8956 Articles) is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

8 Comments on BEPPLE – It’s time for TNRD to invite region’s First Nations to the table

  1. Sally Watson // May 19, 2021 at 5:07 PM // Reply

    Although I applaud the idea, there are some practicalities that need some attention first. The TNRD Board is already 26 Directors, if all FN in the Region had a seat at the table I believe the number would double and if we think it’s hard to get a point across now ,a 52 member board would be cumbersome to say the least. So let’s start with splitting the TNRD Board up at the same time. The North and South Thompson seem to work well with the existing Kamploops driven TNRD, Area J would probably enjoy their close proximity to that city. So let’s take Merritt, the 2 Nicola EAs and all of the west include Lillooet because it doesn’t really fit in with Whistler and Voila, we have a new Regional District ( maybe go farther down the Fraser Canyon too). Admittedly we wouldn’t have a big city to tax but then we wouldn’t be considering a third library for that city. Everyone has a dream

  2. Tim Pennell // May 18, 2021 at 7:57 AM // Reply

    Hey Nancy Bepple maybe Kamloops should to 😃 It’s pay to play and with rare exceptions of contracted services FN do not pay so why would they have a say in how tax dollars are spent. Also, TNRD has no authority on FN land so again, no reason to be at the table.

    • tony brumell // May 18, 2021 at 11:15 PM // Reply

      Tim !!!! Maybe you don’t think that we stoll everything and give almost nothing back. FN should have a say in all levels of gov’t.

  3. Dawne Dawne Taylor // January 20, 2021 at 3:42 PM // Reply

    Of course FN should be at the table. As a Sun Rivers resident living on unceded land within the TNRD, I’m astounded that they are not in the room as equals..

  4. Ian MacKenzie // January 20, 2021 at 3:21 PM // Reply

    “- – – Without First Nations at the table, solutions are incomplete, and valuable inputs are lost.

    For too long, First Nations voices have been absent.”
    No argument here. The more questionable voice might ask whether they would be willing to join the TNRD now that the white community actually sees the power of their involvement or would they just assume it’s another colonial con job.

  5. Tony Brumell // January 20, 2021 at 3:08 PM // Reply

    I would be very careful if I were First Nations . While it may seem fair to invite FN to TNRD board meetings , it should be in numbers that cannot be outvoted by existing board members, It sounds great to include FN but could lead to control issues whereby TNRD positions on environment or resources, healthcare or education are in conflict with FN. This could be troublesome when FN are simply out voted on one or more of these and other issues.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: