NATIONAL PULSE – Many Canadians want to see a more secular nation


While the majority of adults in this country profess some belief in God or a higher power, a significant segment also wishes to see a more secular nation.

A new study from the Angus Reid Institute, in partnership with Cardus, explores elements of this push-and-pull, finding that a premium placed on freedom of religion exists alongside limitations as to how far that faith should extend in public life.

For example, while Canadians are nearly five times as likely to say that freedom of religion makes Canada a better country (62%) than a worse one (12%), they remain divided over whether the values offered by faith contribute to improving equality and human rights (42% disagree that they do). Further, while a firm majority (58%) say that a faith-based upbringing creates better citizenship characteristics, four-in-ten (42%) disagree.

Much of this division is based not on demographics like age, gender, or political persuasion, but on a mindset not immediately evident based on traditional categorizations. The Angus Reid Institute used 17 different variables to categorize Canadians across a Public Faith Index to create three groups: The Public Faith Proponents, the Uncertain and the Public Faith Opponents. Each holds a distinct mindset regarding what role faith should play in public life, and each is comprised of a diverse group of Canadians from all ages, genders and political backgrounds.

This study explores questions about the role of faith in public life as we enter the next decade, using these public faith mindsets as a guide.

More Key Findings:

  • Equal numbers of Canadians are found in both the Public Faith Proponents (36%) and Public Faith Opponents (35%) groups, while three-in-ten (30%) make up the Uncertain.
  • Half of Canadians (49%) feel that faith communities make an impact that is mixed, both good and bad in different instances, while three-in-ten say the influence of these groups is more good than bad overall (31%). Proponents are overwhelmingly positive, while Opponents are less likely to perceive a positive impact.
  • One-in-five Canadians (22%) feel that Canadian society ‘shuts out’ their faith and values, while one-third (33%) feel that room is made for their expression. The biggest group, 37 per cent, do not feel any real impact from broader society with respect to their personal beliefs.

Link to the poll here:

About Mel Rothenburger (8130 Articles) is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

1 Comment on NATIONAL PULSE – Many Canadians want to see a more secular nation

  1. Tony Brumell // December 5, 2019 at 2:24 PM // Reply

    To my understanding secular society has never been an issue in Canada.On the other hand secular government has always been important. The separation of church and state has always been a paramount issue here if not elsewhere. Then comes along bill 21 (?) in Quebec declaring that all gov’t employees will not be allowed to wear overt symbols of their faith. I don’t much care unless the different faiths start killing each other over their belief systems. I do not agree with this bill. As a freedom of religion /freedom of speech country we should be allowed to advertise our beliefs,unless it denigrates or interfears with others culture etc. There is one place where religious symbols must be restricted and that of course is in the house of commons and Provincial legislatures.If government allows such symbols in the various levels of parliament it will undoubtedly end up in subjective legislation or buisness or environmental laws.
    Factions will undoubtedly form and some will vote for or against HOC motions and laws based on the religious powers present in the chamber.The same would be true in the court systems in the country.
    Freedom is a fine thing ,unless it messes with the freedoms of others.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

<span>%d</span> bloggers like this: