Advertisements
LATEST

BEPPLE – Choppy waters may be ahead as council swerves from its course

Future of McArthur Island golf property is still causing some angst. (Image: Mel Rothenburger)

IT IS EARLY DAYS in the new Kamloops City Council, but it seems that there are some choppy waters ahead.

One way of thinking about Council is that they are the rudder, and the City staff are the oars. Council sets the direction they want things to go, but the staff does the heavy lifting.  Council aren’t engineers, IT managers, or accountants.

What that means is that Council decides on a direction, and then, more often than not, staff goes away and creates a report.  The report is then brought before council to debate, and if agreed to, the report leads to some action.

If what happened this Tuesday foretells the future, things are slowing down.

On Tuesday (Dec. 18, 2018), staff asked Council to authorize their work with the Kamloops Disc Golf Club and Kamloops Naturalist Club to develop a conceptual plan, including costs, for the former McArthur Island Golf Course property.

That seemed like a straightforward motion.  This request did not come out of thin air.  This has not been the first time it has come to Council.

Back in October 2017, when the old golf course on McArthur Island closed, the City of Kamloops started consultations with the public.  There were on-line surveys and open houses.  There were hundreds of submissions.

Two visions emerged the strongest.  The first was a nature park, championed by the Kamloops Naturalists.  The second, from the Kamloops Disc Golf Club, was a disc golf course.

The golfers were willing to work with the naturalists, but the naturalists felt two uses were not compatible.

Fast forward to the Fall of 2018, the Council made a decision, which was to allow both uses.

What is troubling with the debate on Tuesday was that Coun. Arjun Singh revised the motion to allow multiple plans to be brought forward to council.  One plan could be from staff, but separate plans from the naturalists, and the disc golfers, could also be brought forward.  Coun. Sadie Hunter then revised the motion again, asking that accessible sites for the disc golf be considered.

Only Mayor Christian and Coun. Dieter Dudy opposed the revisions of Singh and Hunter.

Now-retired councillor Pat Wallace once gave me sage advice: “make a decision and move on.”   The decision has been made to accommodate both naturalists and disc golfers.  What Singh has done is opened a path for the naturalists to revive debate on a single-use (the naturalists’ vision) plan.

There have been hours of consultation with the community.  A decision of Council in the Fall was made to have both golfers, and naturalists share the space.  With multiple reports coming forward, some by staff and some by community groups, Singh has reopened debate on how the space should be used.

Hunter’s goal of creating accessible space is laudable.  But, it is not clear how coming up with sites for an accessible disc golf course (presumably elsewhere), could be accommodated in a report on the McArthur Island site.

Having made a decision to accept multiple reports from various stakeholders, council could get mired into playing trade-off politics between the disc golfers and naturalists.

These issues are the small and somewhat banal decisions that haunt city councils.   It is not this specific decision I’m worried about, but rather the tone it may set, where council will be pitting community groups’ reports against staff reports.  I’m also worried that decision will be rehashed and rehashed, and no clear action taken.

My worry is that this small decision foretells how council operates on bigger issues.

Public consultation should lead to clear decisions by council, not reopening debates.

One wonders how Radio NL’s Angelo Iacobucci kept his humour reporting on Kamloops City council, week after week, year after year.  Godspeed to him for doing such an outstanding job and caring so much for the city he adopted as his own.  I would have loved to hear his take on just one more council debate.

Nancy Bepple is a former city councillor of Kamloops with a strong interest in community building projects.

Advertisements
About Mel Rothenburger (6680 Articles)
ArmchairMayor.ca is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At ArmchairMayor.ca he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

5 Comments on BEPPLE – Choppy waters may be ahead as council swerves from its course

  1. Ken McClelland // December 25, 2018 at 3:03 PM // Reply

    Having had plenty of experience in land-use issues through my involvement in off-road motorcycling and in being involved in the implementation of the off-road vehicle legislation and registration requirement, one thing above all is apparent. Some BC residents do not play well with others when it comes to sharing the landbase. This should be a case of both and, not one or the other. US and European users, with many times the population on smaller landbases have learned this long ago. In BC, not so much, particularly among the nature and non-motorized sectors

  2. Beverley Thies Campbell // December 19, 2018 at 9:40 PM // Reply

    There is, or was, a disc golf course up near the top of Rose Hill, the Nature preserve idea is the most viable and don’t junk it up with all kinds of different ideas, take a look (and a think) about the nature park right in the middle of New York City…..once you junk this natural area up into many tin
    tiny areas you have LOST it forever.

  3. ‘Two visions emerged the strongest. The first was a nature park, championed by the Kamloops Naturalists. The second, from the Kamloops Disc Golf Club, was a disc golf course.’

    This is actually wrong. The Nature Park only received something like 17 votes , with ‘green space’ taking 2nd place behind disc golf course. The city rolled green space and nature park in to one number to arrive at that total. This was a mistake on their part , a very small number of people want a nature park. Also disc golf courses in parks are a ‘green space’ it could have just as well been included with disc golf and it would have been more accurate.

  4. Considering Singh is a senior among the councillors perhaps he should’ve known better and move on? But that’s not in him to make decisions rather, playing both side hoping someone will show up to save the day…can Mel R. write another ode to Arjun perhaps?

  5. It may be a small decision to you, but it isn’t small to everyone

Leave a Reply to Ken McClelland Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: