EDITORIAL – Principle of no-mine buffer zone around communities is sound

An editorial by Mel Rothenburger.

I’VE BEEN READING the reaction on social media to Coun. Dieter Dudy’s proposal to establish a 10-km. buffer zone around communities that would stop mines from being developed within them.

I must say, quite a few of the comments are thoughtful and informative. Others want to refight Ajax, and are of the usual “just stupid” variety, but several offer legitimate comments about such questions as surface claims, compensation for existing claims and gravel pits.

Now that the Ajax issue has pretty much been settled, we seem able to have a more civil discussion about the proximity of mining to urban development.

As to the 10-km. zone proposed by Coun. Dudy, whose notice of motion on the matter will be discussed at tomorrow’s weekly City council meeting, there are already signs there will be some opposition to it from fellow councillors.

That opposition, no doubt, will be founded on concerns about details like the ones I’ve just mentioned.

But keep in mind the concept of buffer zones against mines being built cheek by jowl against communities is nothing new. It was the very foundation of the arguments against Ajax.

Had Ajax been located 10 or 15 km. away from city boundaries, even as far away as the New Afton copper mine, there’s little doubt it would not have been so contentious.

Throughout more than six years of public debate, as comparisons were made with Malartic and other communities next door to mines, “too big, too close” became a rallying cry for opponents.

Dudy’s notice of motion speaks to the fundamental truth that people aren’t against mines as long as they aren’t too close to where they live.

So while the details of his proposal are important, they’re something that can be worked out, and the principle of keeping mines an acceptable distance from home is sound.

It’s something for all levels of government to discuss and come to agreement on.

It’s a concept that could provide some peace between mine developers and communities, and prevent another Ajax.

Mel Rothenburger’s Armchair Mayor editorials appear Mondays through Thursdays on CFJC- TV. His Armchair Mayor column is published Saturdays on and CFJC Today. Contact him at

About Mel Rothenburger (7627 Articles) is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

3 Comments on EDITORIAL – Principle of no-mine buffer zone around communities is sound

  1. Just to clarify Mel…..are all comments that you don’t like ‘just stupid’?

  2. ajaxtoobigtooclose // February 26, 2018 at 7:06 AM // Reply

    Well said.
    Hard lessons learned should be installed in public policy.
    No community deserves to go through that devisive grief.
    It was horrible, neighbours against neighbours, just bad.
    Mines are needed, so are good jobs.
    Just not so big and so close to communities.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: