Advertisements
LATEST

EDUCATION – Universities have schizophrenic attitude on public service

(Image: File photo, Mel Rothenburger)

By ALEX USHER
President, Higher Education Strategy Associates

I HAVE A STRONG message today. It’s mostly for people in social science fields (especially Deans and Department heads), but I think Provosts, VPs Research and President will want to pay attention.

Alex Usher

The message is this: the academic profession in Canada desperately needs to take its head out of its collective behind when it comes to public service.

Universities have a schizophrenic attitude when it comes to public service.  Ask any university President about the value of their institution to the public and guaranteed one of the things that will come out of their mouth is something about contributing to the community, being a place of solutions, partner to government, yadda yadda.

And I have no doubt whatsoever that they actually mean this.  If it were up to university Presidents, that is exactly what universities would do.

The fly in the ointment here is that university Presidents do not actually run things at universities.  In the things that matter to individual academics’ careers (i.e. pay, tenure, promotion), universities are very specifically structured so that Presidents have no say at all about how things are run.

University presidents talk about contributing to the community but the fly in the ointment is that they don’t actually run things

So whatever the President may say about how excited the institution is to participate in certain activities, at the place where the rubber hits the word, their word means essentially nothing.  Everything is in the hands of committees which are rooted in departments rooted in very specific disciplinary traditions and interests.

Now, to be clear, not many academics will ever say they are “against” public service.  It’s just that they have different ideas about what that means.

For far too many of the academics on tenure and promotion committees, public service means writing an article that miraculously gets picked up by someone in government and translated in policy.  The painful jobs of knowledge translation and mobilization?  That’s just something that happens to other people.

And God forbid someone in Government asks an academic to actually devote time to working on a temporary gig like a commission or roundtable or an expert committee.  This looks like an honour both to the public servants doing the asking, and to upper admin (“Look!  People think we are relevant!”) but frequently, and with good reason, academics look at these opportunities with great trepidation.

It’s not because they’d prefer to be writing academic papers: any academic that gets asked into these kind of gigs has probably been asked because they’re interested in/good at this kind of work to begin with.   Rather, it’s because they are worried that their colleagues – possibly jealous ones – will punish them if they don’t.

I raise this issue because frankly I’ve heard one too many stories like this from young and mid-career academics in the social sciences.  People who spend time working with government translating evidence into policy are very frequently punished for it in career terms, and there seems to be remarkably little urgency to alter tenure and promotion criteria to reflect the huge effort that public service actually requires (let alone the psychological toll taken by partisan internet trolls of all stripes who want to impugn academics’ motives for public service).

To many academics, there is a very real sense in which the sweetness and light approach to “serving the community” that senior university administrators talk about with such sincerity is a sucker’s game.

Universities’ position in society is never entirely secure.  To the extent that they appear to be more interested in their own narrow disciplinary pursuits than in benefitting the communities that support them, their position will be ever-less secure.  And yet that is exactly the outcome the current system is engineered to deliver.

Universities need to fix this, now, by actively reviewing their tenure and promotion criteria.  Some of you, dear readers, are in a position to actually do something about this.  You should get started.

Prior to joining the Educational Policy Institute in 2003 and founding Higher Education Strategy Associates (where he is president), Alex Usher served as the Director of Research and Program Development at the Canada Millennium Scholarship Foundation. From 1996 to 1998, he served as a researcher and lobbyist for the Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada and before that was the first national director of the Canadian Alliance of Student Associations. He holds degrees from McGill University and Carleton University. His daily posts on higher education policy and politics, One Thought to Start Your Day, are available at higheredstrategy.com. He tweets @AlexUsherHESA.

 

Advertisements
About Mel Rothenburger (5947 Articles)
ArmchairMayor.ca is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At ArmchairMayor.ca he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: