Advertisements
LATEST

KINSELLA – One step forward, two steps back for the Conservatives

Stephen Harper. (Image: @StephenHarper)

CAN YOU LOSE by winning?

It’s not a riddle, it’s a fair question. Surveying the wreckage that now litters the Conservative landscape, it’s a timely question, too.

Because make no mistake, the Conservatives’ leadership race has dramatically set back their party, perhaps for years to come. Among other things, it has revealed the once-great Conservative Party of Canada to be nasty, brutish and short-sighted. It has transformed many in a modern, broad-based political party into xenophobic, paranoid Duck Dynasty types – rubes who look like they’d rather jail an immigrant than attend a banquet with one.

By selecting a winner, the Conservative Party of Canada has rendered itself a loser, and wholly undeserving of power.

The Conservatives will soon have a new leader but divisive politics have dragged the party away from Stephen Harper’s winning fundamentals

First, some historical context.

Former prime minister and Conservative party leader Stephen Harper’s greatest political achievements, you see, were not what you would think. They weren’t the things that he didn’t do. Five points.

  • He didn’t outlaw abortion or gay marriage, contrary to what this writer (and many others) predicted.
  • He didn’t make the great global recession of 2008-2009 worse. While he may have initially denied the recession was coming, when it did, Harper tossed off his fiscal conservative cape and commenced spending like a proverbial drunken sailor. It worked.
  • He didn’t send us into war. When he was Opposition leader, Harper infamously called Canadians who opposed George W. Bush’s Iraq war “cowards.” But once ensconced in power, the Conservative prime minister embraced his inner peacenik: he didn’t put boots on the ground in the fight against IS (current Liberal Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, however, did). And he didn’t deploy Canadian Forces in the most lethal region in Afghanistan (former Liberal prime minister Paul Martin did).
  • Harper – unlike so many in the Reform Party firmament – didn’t ignore Quebec or preside over a revitalized separatist movement. Instead, he started every single speech with French, no matter where he was. He didn’t give the always-humiliated nationalists their hoped-for humiliations. And, as a result, his party didn’t do badly in Quebec, at all – in 2015, in fact, when the Tories lost power, the only province in which their support grew was Quebec.
  • And Harper didn’t wreck the place. We’re still here. And when one considers the post-Brexit and post-Donald Trump chaos that has descended on our two closest allies, well, we are pretty lucky, aren’t we?

But those things – what Harper didn’t do – aren’t achievements. You don’t get awards for what you don’t do. You don’t get your name on the side of a school somewhere for acting like a sensible, centrist adult. That’s what you’re supposed to be doing.

No, Harper’s two greatest political achievements – and, by extension, the Conservative Party’s – were the reason why he won the federal elections in 2006, 2008 and 2011. They are simply these:

  • He united the warring factions within the conservative movement – Reform, Progressive Conservative and Canadian Alliance – and led them to power shortly thereafter.
  • He rejected the sort of intolerance that had been synonymous with Canadian conservatism since Sir John A. Macdonald. He expelled the bigots from his caucus and started the most successful ethnic outreach campaign in modern times.

So what has the post-Harper Conservative Party done? It has turned its back on Harper’s two greatest achievements. It has repudiated the very things that won them power in 2006.

The Conservative leadership race has been fractious and divisive. It has seen progressive conservatives like Michael Chong booed for promoting modernism – and unrepentant Reformers, like Kellie Leitch, cheered for championing racism. It has seen smart, traditional Tories like Lisa Raitt marginalized and ignored, and immigrant-baiting nobodies like Steven Blaney and Brad Trost given marquee treatment.

And, if this Conservative leadership race is to be remembered for anything at all, it will be its willingness to replicate Trump-style bigotry in Canada – and the narrow, mean-spirited bumper-sticker politics it has championed along the way.

Too many of the candidates have forsaken what Harper did. Too many have forgotten that, by coming together and bringing new Canadians into the fold, the Conservatives finally won power.

The Conservative Party will have a winner in its leadership race in May, to be sure. It will have won that much.

But, by winning, it will have lost the country, likely for many years to come.

Warren Kinsella is a Canadian journalist, political adviser and commentator. 

© 2017 Distributed by Troy Media

Advertisements
About Mel Rothenburger (4715 Articles)
ArmchairMayor.ca is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At ArmchairMayor.ca he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: